There's too much manual work involved in releasing now (updating
translations, copying docs-master) to make automatic releases
infeasible. I'm not worried that I forget to release on the first
Saturday of every month.
Keeping the code commented out in case we want to re-enable it at some
point.
There's too much manual work involved in releasing now (updating translations,
copying docs-master) to make automatic releases infeasible. I'm not worried that
I forget to release on the first Saturday of every month.
Keeping the code commented out in case we want to re-enable it at some point.
This is a regression introduced with #5135. I didn't notice it because I
am using `gui.scrollOffBehavior: jump`, in which case the problem
wouldn't appear; it only happened with `scrollOffBehavior: margin`
(which is the default). In that case, if you used the arrow keys (or
j/k) to move the selection so that the view would start to scroll, empty
space would appear.
Fixes#5235.
This is a regression introduced with #5135. I didn't notice it because I am
using `gui.scrollOffBehavior: jump`, in which case the problem wouldn't appear;
it only happened with `scrollOffBehavior: margin` (which is the default). In
that case, if you used the arrow keys (or j/k) to move the selection so that the
view would start to scroll, empty space would appear.
### PR Description
Paths added to ignore/exclude files need to be prefixed with a forward
slash to point to a specific file in the directory tree.
Without that prefix a file at root called `file` (added to `.gitignore`
as `file`) would match with `./file` and `./src/file`.
Example flow:
1. User creates a directory called `tests` in root
2. User sees that it's tracked
3. User ignores the directory in Lazygit
4. Changes in `src/tests` are now missing - because `tests` without `/`
matches also directories lower in the tree
Paths added to ignore/exclude files need to be prefixed with a forward
slash to point to a specific file in the directory tree.
Without that prefix a file at root called `file` (added to `.gitignore`
as `file`) would match with `./file` and `./src/file`.
This brings in https://github.com/jesseduffield/gocui/pull/98 with the following
fix:
Fix rendering of CRLF sequence ('\r\n')
The FirstGraphemeCluster call returns this as a single character; we want to
treat it the same way as a single \n.
This would be a problem if e.g. a progress bar used \r repeatedly to paint over
the same line, and then printed a \n to move on to the next line; the last pair
of \r and \n was swallowed.
Another scenario where this was a problem was if you stream output of a command
to the log, and the command used \r\n as line feeds. This happens for example
for a background fetch that fails with an error; in that case we print the
combined output (stdout plus stderr) to the log after the command finished, and
for some reason it uses \r\n in that case (I can't actually explain why; when I
do `git fetch --all | xxd` I see only bare \n characters). All output would
appear on one line then.
Also, filter out escape sequences for character set designation; there's nothing
useful we can do with them. In practice, the only one that you are likely to see
is `ESC ( B`, which is sent as part of tput sgr0, which is sometimes used in
scripts to reset all graphics attributes to defaults.
### PR Description
I had a spare couple hours so figured I'd whip up a PR for a feature
I've wanted for a while.
I've optimised for muscle memory backwards compatibility here:
- Outside interactive rebase: press 'f' then instead of a confirmation
panel, a menu appears where you can choose to keep the selected commit's
message
- Inside interactive rebase: press 'f' then press 'c' to see the menu
for keeping the message, where if you press 'c' again it will retain the
current message. so 'fcc' is the chord to press.
We're also now showing the -C flag (which is what enables the behaviour)
against the todo.
I've picked the 'c' keybinding because 'C' was taken and it corresponds
to the flag. Previously that showed a warning about a change in
keybinding for cherry picking but it's been ages since we've made that
change so I'm happy to retire it.
I've optimised for muscle memory backwards compatibility here:
- Outside interactive rebase: press 'f' then instead of a confirmation
panel, a menu appears where you can choose to keep the selected commit's
message
- Inside interactive rebase: press 'f' then press 'c' to see the menu
for keeping the message, where if you press 'c' again it will retain the
current message. so 'fcc' is the chord to press.
We're also now showing the -C flag (which is what enables the behaviour)
against the todo.
I've picked the 'c' keybinding because 'C' was taken and it corresponds
to the flag. Previously that showed a warning about a change in
keybinding for cherry picking but it's been ages since we've made that
change so I'm happy to retire it.
Not used yet, we pass an empty string everywhere, to match the previous
behavior. Just extracting this into a separate commit to make the next one
smaller.
Co-authored-by: Stefan Haller <stefan@haller-berlin.de>
It's been ages since we changed the key, users should hopefully be used to it by
now, and we want to reuse the key for something else later in the branch.
Co-authored-by: Stefan Haller <stefan@haller-berlin.de>
On very large screens they would get ridiculously wide.
The limits we chose here are a little arbitrary:
- 80 for confirmations and prompts
- 90 for menus
- auto-wrap width plus 25 for the commit message editor (or 100 if
auto-wrap is off)
On very large screens they would get ridiculously wide.
The limits we chose here are a little arbitrary:
- 80 for confirmations and prompts
- 90 for menus
- auto-wrap width plus 25 for the commit message editor (or 100 if auto-wrap is
off)
To reproduce: open the keybindings menu ('?'), press '>' to select the
last line, esc to close it, open it again. The view would appear still
scrolled down, so the selected first line was out of view. Even worse,
if you open a different, shorter menu (e.g. the "View upstream reset
options..." menu in the Files panel), you'd only see the Cancel item,
the other ones were scrolled out of view.
This is a regression introduced with efd4298b5e91 (#5134).
To reproduce: open the keybindings menu ('?'), press '>' to select the last
line, esc to close it, open it again. The view would appear still scrolled down,
so the selected first line was out of view. Even worse, if you open a different,
shorter menu (e.g. the "View upstream reset options..." menu in the Files
panel), you'd only see the Cancel item, the other ones were scrolled out of
view.
This is a regression introduced with efd4298b5e91 (#5134).
When marking commits as good or bad during a bisect, a "git rev-list"
call would appear in the Command log. This is confusing, it's an
internal detail that is not interesting for the user to see.
When marking commits as good or bad during a bisect, a "git rev-list" call would
appear in the Command log. This is confusing, it's an internal detail that is
not interesting for the user to see.
### PR Description
- Updated `actions/github-script` from `v7` to `v8` in
`.github/workflows/close-issues.yml`
- Updated `actions/setup-go` from `v5` to `v6` in
`.github/workflows/release.yml`
- Updated `golangci/golangci-lint-action` from `v8` to `v9` in
`.github/workflows/ci.yml`
- Updated `actions/checkout` from `v4` to `v6` in
`.github/workflows/codespell.yml`
- Updated `actions/checkout` from `v4` to `v6` in
`.github/workflows/release.yml`
- Updated `peter-evans/create-pull-request` from `v7` to `v8` in
`.github/workflows/sponsors.yml`
- Updated `actions/download-artifact` from `v4` to `v7` in
`.github/workflows/ci.yml`
- Updated `actions/checkout` from `v4` to `v6` in
`.github/workflows/ci.yml`
- Updated `actions/checkout` from `v4` to `v6` in
`.github/workflows/sponsors.yml`
- Updated `actions/setup-go` from `v5` to `v6` in
`.github/workflows/ci.yml`
The changes ensure that the GitHub Action workflows are using the latest
versions of the actions, which include improved functionality and
compatibility. These updates will be tested in the CI pipeline of the
pull request.
If the ctrl-f function (Find base commit for fixup) finds a base commit
plus a bunch of fixup! commits for that base commit, it ignores those
fixups and selects the base commit. For the purpose of creating another
fixup commit on top this is always what you want, so I'm doing this
without adding a confirmation. If the user presses shift-A after that to
amend their changes though, they are guaranteed to get conflicts, so for
that case a warning might be useful; however, I find it unlikely that
users will want to amend changes to a commit that they already created
fixups for, so I'm just hoping that this won't happen in practice.
This implementation is a bit stricter than #5201, in that it only
ignores fixups if the first found commit is not a fixup itself; because
if it is, it's not clear whether the user wants to create another fixup
for both on top, or amend the changes into each one, in which case they
need to be staged individually.
When opening a PR, a "git ls-remote" call would appear in the Command
log. This is confusing, it's an internal detail that is not interesting
for the user to see.
