(Please be generous for some typos and grammar error in sentences below. English is not my mother tongue) TRDR : This patch fixes flutter run(and might be flutter build too) failure on iOS flutter apps with companion watchOS app in case the WKCompanionAppBundleIdentifier value is defined by xcode project configuration and uses different app bundle id by scheme(which happens when you do something like com.myapp.app1.dev things for scheme bundle id) This change checks default scheme (the scheme with corresponding name for the debug/release mode and selected build flavor.) in the build settings check step of containsWatchCompanion function. current code of containsWatchCompanion function works like below 1. check all default Info.plist file's content of all targets to determine if the project has watchOS companion apps. (this doesn't work well in mordern xcode settings when they use multi plist files which are selected on build time by build configuration. Sometimes, the default Info.plist file doesn't even exist in the project.) 2. check if "WKCompanionAppBundleIdentifier" is included in the xcode project info file(the ios/Runner.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj file in case of iOS project generated by flutter) 3. If "WKCompanionAppBundleIdentifier" has found in the project info file, check build configuration variables of every single scheme but the current target scheme if they have config value with key "INFOPLIST_KEY_WKCompanionAppBundleIdentifier" identical to current build configuration's bundle identifier returned by productBundleIdentifier@xcode_project.dart function. I believe The third step causes many problems reported in some issue and pr, saying iOS app with companion watchOS app fails on build or run. https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/160622 https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/172436 In my case, My iOS project had multiple schemes which are linked to different build configurations, but using single Runner setting per app. because we exclude current scheme for the check, we get all the INFOPLIST_KEY_WKCompanionAppBundleIdentifier values except the one which should be same with the identifier returned by productBundleIdentifier@xcode_project.dart function. that is because companion watch apps doesn't have to have same WKCompanionAppBundleIdentifier with other scheme's main app. We have to check the default scheme to see watchOS companion app`s WKCompanionAppBundleIdentifier, not other scheme. (other schemes can have slightly different or totally different bundle id. that was to support different environment systems like dev, prod in my case) as a result, flutter run gave me WatchOS app built for device target iOS/iPad, not Watch. which caused problem during installation of iOS app to a simulator because the embeded Watch App was in invalid format. I found this by inspecting Info.plist of generated watchOS app. below is part of the flutter run verbose log with failure caused by old code. [+1154 ms] An error was encountered processing the command (domain=IXUserPresentableErrorDomain, code=1): App installation failed: ‘Bora Debug-dev’을(를) 설치할 수 없음 (which says "cannot install" in korean) 나중에 다시 시도하십시오. (which says "try again later" in korean) Found WatchKit 2.0 app at /Users/javalia/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Devices/071691B3-7901-47E5-9B38-4D5B799F3530/data/Library/Caches/com.apple.mobile.installd.staging/temp.8HZIEG/extracted/Payload/Runner.app/Watch/bora Watch App.app but it does not have a WKWatchKitApp or WKApplication key set to true in its Info.plist Underlying error (domain=IXUserPresentableErrorDomain, code=1): ‘Bora Debug-dev’을(를) 설치할 수 없음 (which says "cannot install" in korean) 나중에 다시 시도하십시오. (which says "try it later" in korean) I suggest this change with two reasons : 1. I think forcing watchOS app makers split their runner configurations to support watch companion app is something not recommendable/not good to force as a convention. (Which is implied in the comment which is removed by this pr, and could be one of the valid detouring. some people in this issue https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/160622 said that a detouring is adding of dummy WKCompanionAppBundleIdentifier configuration in iOS app, which should be in only watchOS apps in normal.) 2. The function should work as it's name implies, so I guess it should not omit default scheme during check. Matching function's behavior with it's name will be likely to reduce potential errors caused by this change while fixing problems. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [ X ] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [ X ] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [ X ] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [ X ] I signed the [CLA]. - [ X ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [ ] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md --------- Co-authored-by: hellohuanlin <41930132+hellohuanlin@users.noreply.github.com>
Flutter Tools
This section of the Flutter repository contains the command line developer tools for building Flutter applications.
Working on Flutter Tools
Be sure to follow the instructions on CONTRIBUTING.md to set up your development environment. Further, familiarize yourself with the style guide, which we follow.
Setting up
First, ensure that the Dart SDK and other necessary artifacts are available by invoking the Flutter Tools wrapper script. In this directory run:
$ flutter --version
Running the Tool
To run Flutter Tools from source, in this directory run:
$ dart bin/flutter_tools.dart
followed by command-line arguments, as usual.
As a convenience for folks developing the flutter tool itself,
you can also use the bin/flutter-dev script:
# Assuming flutter/bin is on your PATH
$ flutter-dev
Note: flutter-dev is identical to flutter, except it does not
use a cached on-disk snapshot. In other words, it will be significantly
slower but you will not need to forget (remember?) to delete the cached
snapshot.
Running the analyzer
To run the analyzer on Flutter Tools, in this directory run:
$ flutter analyze
Writing tests
As with other parts of the Flutter repository, all changes in behavior
must be tested.
Tests live under the test/ subdirectory.
-
Hermetic unit tests of tool internals go under
test/general.shardand must run in significantly less than two seconds. -
Tests of tool commands go under
test/commands.shard. Hermetic tests go under itshermetic/subdirectory. Non-hermetic tests go under itspermeablesub-directory. Avoid adding tests here and prefer writing either a unit test or a full integration test. -
Integration tests (e.g. tests that run the tool in a subprocess) go under
test/integration.shard. -
Slow web-related tests go in the
test/web.sharddirectory.
In general, the tests for the code in a file called file.dart should
go in a file called file_test.dart in the subdirectory that matches
the behavior of the test.
The dart_test.yaml file configures the timeout for these tests to be
15 minutes. The test.dart script that is used in CI overrides this
to two seconds for the test/general.shard directory, to catch
behaviour that is unexpectedly slow.
Please avoid setting any other timeouts.
Using local engine builds in integration tests
The integration tests can be configured to use a specific local engine
variant by setting the FLUTTER_LOCAL_ENGINE and FLUTTER_LOCAL_ENGINE_HOST
environment variables to the name of the local engines (e.g. android_debug_unopt
and host_debug_unopt). If the local engine build requires a source path, this
can be provided by setting the FLUTTER_LOCAL_ENGINE_SRC_PATH environment
variable. This second variable is not necessary if the flutter and engine
checkouts are in adjacent directories.
export FLUTTER_LOCAL_ENGINE=android_debug_unopt
export FLUTTER_LOCAL_ENGINE_HOST=host_debug_unopt
flutter test test/integration.shard/some_test_case
Running the tests
To run all of the unit tests:
$ flutter test test/general.shard
The tests in test/integration.shard are slower to run than the tests
in test/general.shard. Depending on your development computer, you
might want to limit concurrency. Generally it is easier to run these
on CI, or to manually verify the behavior you are changing instead of
running the test.
The integration tests also require the FLUTTER_ROOT environment
variable to be set. The full invocation to run everything might
therefore look something like:
$ export FLUTTER_ROOT=~/path/to/flutter-sdk
$ flutter test --concurrency 1
This may take some time (on the order of an hour). The unit tests alone take much less time (on the order of a minute).
You can run the tests in a specific file, e.g.:
$ flutter test test/general.shard/utils_test.dart
Forcing snapshot regeneration
To force the Flutter Tools snapshot to be regenerated, delete the following files:
$ rm ../../bin/cache/flutter_tools.stamp ../../bin/cache/flutter_tools.snapshot