CustomScrollViewExampleApp
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/130459
The test is checking:
- if all crucial Widgets are initially visible
- if IconButton click will expand existing SliverList
- if IconButton click and mouse scroll will reveal additional SliverList
A pending change to the flutter_drone LUCI recipe is using a logging library that sets the FLUTTER_TEST_OUTPUTS_DIR environment variable (see https://flutter.googlesource.com/recipes/+/b111cd3ef2297e66905cc48c2cfedce0cf1ba46f)
flutter_driver uses FLUTTER_TEST_OUTPUTS_DIR as its output directory if it is set. run_web_tests invokes flutter_driver and needs to look for outputs in that directory.
Not so long ago I remember a very informal conversation that went something like this:
> @matanlurey: I wish I could pass `--dev` or something to `flutter` to run from source.
>
> @christopherfujino: I get what you want, but I don't want to overload the tool with more dev-only things. I would consider a script like `flutter-dev` that does that thing, though.
>
> @matanlurey: Cool, I might send a PR!
So uh, here it is 6-9 months later. Suggestions welcome.
Contributes to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/130459
It adds a test for
- `examples/api/lib/widgets/single_child_scroll_view/single_child_scroll_view.0.dart`
- `examples/api/lib/widgets/single_child_scroll_view/single_child_scroll_view.1.dart`
I also fixed a mistake in the documentation
When attempting to release the Flutter 3.24.1 hotfix, Flutter framework post submits failed due to the following error:
```
âââ¡ERROR #1âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ
â UNEXPECTED ERROR!
â Exception: Found unexpected binary in cache: /Volumes/Work/s/w/ir/x/w/flutter/bin/cache/artifacts/engine/ios-release/extension_safe/Flutter.xcframework/ios-arm64_x86_64-simulator/dSYMs/Flutter.framework.dSYM/Contents/Resources/DWARF/Flutter
â #0 verifyExist (file:///Volumes/Work/s/w/ir/x/w/flutter/dev/bots/suite_runners/run_verify_binaries_codesigned_tests.dart:150:12)
â <asynchronous suspension>
â #1 verifyCodesignedTestRunner (file:///Volumes/Work/s/w/ir/x/w/flutter/dev/bots/suite_runners/run_verify_binaries_codesigned_tests.dart:28:3)
â <asynchronous suspension>
â #2 _runFromList (file:///Volumes/Work/s/w/ir/x/w/flutter/dev/bots/utils.dart:601:5)
â <asynchronous suspension>
â #3 main (file:///Volumes/Work/s/w/ir/x/w/flutter/dev/bots/test.dart:125:5)
â <asynchronous suspension>
â
â The test.dart script should be corrected to catch this error and call foundError().
â Some tests are likely to have been skipped.
ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ
```
I've updated the tests to include the listed artifact.
### Open questions
1. Is it possible that the test failed only on the first binary?
2. Do we expect a need to add the remainder of the [entitlement changes](c9b9d5780d)?
3. I am under the assumption that the bots pull from master and are not branch specific, is this a correct assumption?
CC @christopherfujino @cbracken
Move `scroll_direction.0_test.dart` & `growth_direction.0_test.dart` to same directory structure as the example files.
Tests were already present, only had to move them & remove the entries from the missing tests.
Part of #130459
Contributes to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/130459
It adds a test for
- `examples/api/lib/material/scaffold/scaffold_messenger_state.show_snack_bar.0.dart`
- `examples/api/lib/material/scaffold/scaffold_messenger_state.show_material_banner.0.dart`
Contributes to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/130459
It adds a test for
- `examples/api/lib/material/search_anchor/search_anchor.1.dart`
- `examples/api/lib/material/search_anchor/search_anchor.2.dart`
Contributes to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/130459
It adds a test for
- `examples/api/lib/material/scaffold/scaffold_messenger.0.dart`
- `examples/api/lib/material/scaffold/scaffold_messenger.of.0.dart`
- `examples/api/lib/material/scaffold/scaffold_messenger.of.1.dart`
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/152325.
This PR is large due to generate `flutter create --platforms android`. A quick summary:
- Moves the integration test from `packages/flutter_driver/test` to `dev/integration_tests`
- Created a sample Flutter app that draws a blue rectangle
- Forked a subset of `package:flutter_goldens` that will work on the standalone Dart VM
- Forked a subset of `goldens.dart` (from `flutter_test`) to `src/native/goldens.dart` (i.e. `matchesGoldenFile`)
This ... works locally, but as usual I have no idea if it will work on Skia Gold so let's roll some dice.
Turns out just supporting the right value for `kDebugMode` was a lot simpler than I thought. Debug builds used to never go through the build system code path when using `flutter run`, but now that we have wasm this can occur with the run command.
This should address https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148850
Otherwise I get the following failure on CI:
```txt
packages/flutter_driver/lib/src/native/android.dart:123: Found "```" in code but it did not match RegExp: pattern=^ */// *```dart$ flags= so something is wrong. Line was: " /// ```sh"
Found 1 snippet code errors.
See the documentation at the top of dev/bots/analyze_snippet_code.dart for details.
```
It seems reasonable to put a reference to a shell command in a Dartdoc
comment.
I really like how patterns can be used for variable assignment and avoiding duplicated logic. (related: #150942)
```dart
// before
final GestureRecognizer? recognizer = info.recognizer;
if (recognizer is TapGestureRecognizer) {
if (recognizer.onTap != null) {
configuration.onTap = recognizer.onTap;
configuration.isLink = true;
}
} else if (recognizer is DoubleTapGestureRecognizer) {
if (recognizer.onDoubleTap != null) {
configuration.onTap = recognizer.onDoubleTap;
configuration.isLink = true;
}
}
// after
switch (info.recognizer) {
case TapGestureRecognizer(:final VoidCallback? onTap):
case DoubleTapGestureRecognizer(onDoubleTap: final VoidCallback? onTap):
if (onTap != null) {
configuration.onTap = onTap;
configuration.isLink = true;
}
}
```
Reverts: flutter/flutter#150969
Initiated by: goderbauer
Reason for reverting: Failing test in https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8743574743030691569/+/u/run_android_obfuscate_test/stdout
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {christopherfujino, reidbaker}
This change reverts the following previous change:
After the land of https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53592, there is some log spam:
```
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/c1e137371ec1afe9bc9bd7b05823752d/transformed/fragment-1.7.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/fragment_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/d86c7cb1c556fe1655fa56db671c649c/transformed/jetified-activity-1.8.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/activity_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
...
```
I think this is harmless, but still annoying. Upgrading the AGP version fixes it. To be honest, I don't know why (I expected the Kotlin version would do it). But after https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, our tests have been running on AGP/Gradle 8.1/8.3 for a while, so it makes sense to upgrade anyways.
In a follow up PR:
1. Also upgrade the tests that were left behind in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, as I think removal of discontinued plugins paved the way here.
After the land of https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53592, there is some log spam:
```
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/c1e137371ec1afe9bc9bd7b05823752d/transformed/fragment-1.7.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/fragment_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/d86c7cb1c556fe1655fa56db671c649c/transformed/jetified-activity-1.8.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/activity_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
...
```
I think this is harmless, but still annoying. Upgrading the AGP version fixes it. To be honest, I don't know why (I expected the Kotlin version would do it). But after https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, our tests have been running on AGP/Gradle 8.1/8.3 for a while, so it makes sense to upgrade anyways.
In a follow up PR:
1. Also upgrade the tests that were left behind in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, as I think removal of discontinued plugins paved the way here.
