Generate new gradle lockfiles and delete ignore locking files.
```bash
dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-gradle-generation --no-exclusion --stop-ignoring
```
Fixes: [#177071](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/177071)
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
This PR is the first of 2 that will update the Android Embedder to use
the new dependency for AndroidX Exifinterface. This PR generates the
necessary ignore lockfiles files. These files will be deleted in a
follow-up PR that also regenerates the gradle lockfiles from the
universal engine artifacts.
Addresses [#177071](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/177071)
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
Create a workaround for generating gradle lock files. When the ignore
files exist, gradle locking will be disabled. This will allow deps for
the embedder to be checked in, and then in a follow-up PR the lockfiles
can correctly be updated and the ignore files can be deleted.
Note: This does NOT include the addition of the new exifinterface dep
for the Android embedder.
Fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/177066
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#178417
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jtmcdole
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: tree broke
<img width="1892" height="116" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8dc73727-322e-4fe3-b9b8-968048989f88"
/>
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: mboetger
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {gmackall}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
This is a follow-up PR to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/177508
This generates the new Gradle lockfiles from the new engine artifacts
and deletes the .ignore-locking.md file.
Generated by running:
```bash
dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-gradle-generation --no-exclusion
```
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
This is a follow-up PR to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/177508
This generates the new Gradle lockfiles from the new engine artifacts
and deletes the .ignore-locking.md file.
Generated by running:
```bash
dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-gradle-generation --no-exclusion
```
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#177508
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jtmcdole
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: tree is no bueno
```
┌─ Flutter Fix ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ [2025-11-12 16:47:24.646119] [STDOUT] stdout: │ You need to update the lockfile, or disable Gradle dependency locking. │ [2025-11-12 16:47:24.646119] [STDOUT] stdout: │ To regenerate the lockfiles run: `.\gradlew.bat :generateLockfiles` in │ [2025-11-12 16:47:24.646119] [STDOUT] stdout: │ c:\
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: mboetger
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {reidbaker, gmackall}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
Create a workaround for generating gradle lock files. When the ignore file exists, gradle locking will be disabled. This will allow deps for the embedder to be checked in, and then in a follow-up PR the lockfiles can correctly be updated and the ignore file can be deleted.
Fixes: #177066, #177071
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
Create a workaround for generating gradle lock files. When the ignore
file exists, gradle locking will be disabled. This will allow deps for
the embedder to be checked in, and then in a follow-up PR the lockfiles
can correctly be updated and the ignore file can be deleted.
Fixes: #177066, #177071
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
---------
Co-authored-by: Reid Baker <1063596+reidbaker@users.noreply.github.com>
- **Remove jetifiier usages across repo**
Similar to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/173459
Related to #173430
Used `grep --exclude-dir=third_party --include=gradle\.properties -rw .
-e "android.enableJetifier=true"` to find usages.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
- **Relands "Bump warn and error versions of agp, kotlin and gradle
versions in preparation for gradle 9 (#171399)"**
- **bump lockfile generator to use kotlin 2.1.0**
- **Update formatting of lockfile to pass ktlint**
Updated lockfiles with
`JAVA_HOME=/opt/homebrew/opt/openjdk@17/libexec/openjdk.jdk/Contents/Home/
dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart` after
dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart to bump the versions of
kotlin.
Failing tests from first attempt
https://flutter-dashboard.appspot.com/#/build?hashFilter=84a5ce765d193a9c79ab4297f367d5ad7efc5dac&showMac=false&showWindows=false&showiOS=false&showLinux=false&showBringup=true&repo=flutter&branch=master
Verified example test that cause revert was passing by running the
following
- `../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t
run_debug_test_android.dart` from `dev/devicelab`
- `../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t
run_release_test` from `dev/devicelab`
- `SHARD=android_engine_vulkan_tests bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart
dev/bots/test.dart` from root with an android emulator. Hard to actually
verify because the emulator is closed as part of the tests but no
failures were from failures to compile.
- `flutter test
test/general.shard/android/android_project_migration_test.dart` from
`packages/flutter_tools/`
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#169451
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: matanlurey
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Broke a number of post-submit tests
(ios_app_extension, packages_autoroller).
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: mosuem
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {matanlurey}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
Reland after #169357.
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
Reland after #169357.
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
This reverts commit
8dccbc33df.
Find/replace didn't catch the use of `jvmTarget = "1.8"` in
`dev/integration_tests/android_engine_test/android/app/build.gradle` and
`android_engine_test` needed to have `"com.android.application"`
updated.
Should resolve issues related to the following messages being output on
stderr:
```
warning: [options] source value 8 is obsolete and will be removed in a future release"
warning: [options] target value 8 is obsolete and will be removed in a future release
warning: [options] To suppress warnings about obsolete options, use -Xlint:-options.
```
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/165973
Fixes#162107
Commands that were helpful when working on this pr.
`dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart
--no-gradle-generation` from flutter/flutter root.
`./gradlew test` from packages/flutter_tools/gradle.
`git add -- ":*.lockfile"` for adding only lockfile changes.
`../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t
android_java11_dependency_smoke_tests` from dev/devicelab
`ktlint --editorconfig=dev/bots/test/analyze-test-input/.editorconfig
--baseline=dev/bots/test/analyze-test-input/ktlint-baseline.xml
packages/flutter_tools/gradle/src/ --format` formatting kotlin code.
Need ktlint 1.5
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/160257.
~~This will sit on CI for a bit and give me a better idea of how much
work there is to do.~~ Done!
## IMPORTANT: Do **not** revert on 1-2 isolated post-submit failures.
While I've spent the last several weeks getting this passing all
presubmit tests, and some integration tests I suspected might be
affected, it is possible that there are 1-2 integration tests that will
fail as a result of landing this PR. I'll disable the flag
(`--no-explicit-package-dependencies`) if the failures look obvious
enough, otherwise I'll revert.
This auto-formats all *.dart files in the repository outside of the
`engine` subdirectory and enforces that these files stay formatted with
a presubmit check.
**Reviewers:** Please carefully review all the commits except for the
one titled "formatted". The "formatted" commit was auto-generated by
running `dev/tools/format.sh -a -f`. The other commits were hand-crafted
to prepare the repo for the formatting change. I recommend reviewing the
commits one-by-one via the "Commits" tab and avoiding Github's "Files
changed" tab as it will likely slow down your browser because of the
size of this PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kate Lovett <katelovett@google.com>
Co-authored-by: LongCatIsLooong <31859944+LongCatIsLooong@users.noreply.github.com>
First part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/160379.
This should be a NOP, because without the
`explicit-package-dependencies` feature flag, all dependencies
(including dev_dependencies) are considered, for the purposes of
plugins, non-dev dependencies.
This change prepares for flipping that flag, so when the flip occurs, it
is _also_ a NOP for these tests.
