Generate new gradle lockfiles and delete ignore locking files.
```bash
dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-gradle-generation --no-exclusion --stop-ignoring
```
Fixes: [#177071](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/177071)
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
This PR is the first of 2 that will update the Android Embedder to use
the new dependency for AndroidX Exifinterface. This PR generates the
necessary ignore lockfiles files. These files will be deleted in a
follow-up PR that also regenerates the gradle lockfiles from the
universal engine artifacts.
Addresses [#177071](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/177071)
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
Create a workaround for generating gradle lock files. When the ignore
files exist, gradle locking will be disabled. This will allow deps for
the embedder to be checked in, and then in a follow-up PR the lockfiles
can correctly be updated and the ignore files can be deleted.
Note: This does NOT include the addition of the new exifinterface dep
for the Android embedder.
Fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/177066
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#178417
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jtmcdole
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: tree broke
<img width="1892" height="116" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8dc73727-322e-4fe3-b9b8-968048989f88"
/>
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: mboetger
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {gmackall}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
This is a follow-up PR to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/177508
This generates the new Gradle lockfiles from the new engine artifacts
and deletes the .ignore-locking.md file.
Generated by running:
```bash
dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-gradle-generation --no-exclusion
```
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
This is a follow-up PR to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/177508
This generates the new Gradle lockfiles from the new engine artifacts
and deletes the .ignore-locking.md file.
Generated by running:
```bash
dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-gradle-generation --no-exclusion
```
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#177508
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jtmcdole
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: tree is no bueno
```
┌─ Flutter Fix ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ [2025-11-12 16:47:24.646119] [STDOUT] stdout: │ You need to update the lockfile, or disable Gradle dependency locking. │ [2025-11-12 16:47:24.646119] [STDOUT] stdout: │ To regenerate the lockfiles run: `.\gradlew.bat :generateLockfiles` in │ [2025-11-12 16:47:24.646119] [STDOUT] stdout: │ c:\
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: mboetger
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {reidbaker, gmackall}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
Create a workaround for generating gradle lock files. When the ignore file exists, gradle locking will be disabled. This will allow deps for the embedder to be checked in, and then in a follow-up PR the lockfiles can correctly be updated and the ignore file can be deleted.
Fixes: #177066, #177071
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
Create a workaround for generating gradle lock files. When the ignore
file exists, gradle locking will be disabled. This will allow deps for
the embedder to be checked in, and then in a follow-up PR the lockfiles
can correctly be updated and the ignore file can be deleted.
Fixes: #177066, #177071
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
---------
Co-authored-by: Reid Baker <1063596+reidbaker@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR was generated by `flutter update-packages --force-upgrade`
followed by `dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart
--no-exclusion --no-gradle-generation`
---------
Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com>
- **Remove jetifiier usages across repo**
Similar to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/173459
Related to #173430
Used `grep --exclude-dir=third_party --include=gradle\.properties -rw .
-e "android.enableJetifier=true"` to find usages.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
- **Relands "Bump warn and error versions of agp, kotlin and gradle
versions in preparation for gradle 9 (#171399)"**
- **bump lockfile generator to use kotlin 2.1.0**
- **Update formatting of lockfile to pass ktlint**
Updated lockfiles with
`JAVA_HOME=/opt/homebrew/opt/openjdk@17/libexec/openjdk.jdk/Contents/Home/
dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart` after
dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart to bump the versions of
kotlin.
Failing tests from first attempt
https://flutter-dashboard.appspot.com/#/build?hashFilter=84a5ce765d193a9c79ab4297f367d5ad7efc5dac&showMac=false&showWindows=false&showiOS=false&showLinux=false&showBringup=true&repo=flutter&branch=master
Verified example test that cause revert was passing by running the
following
- `../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t
run_debug_test_android.dart` from `dev/devicelab`
- `../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t
run_release_test` from `dev/devicelab`
- `SHARD=android_engine_vulkan_tests bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart
dev/bots/test.dart` from root with an android emulator. Hard to actually
verify because the emulator is closed as part of the tests but no
failures were from failures to compile.
- `flutter test
test/general.shard/android/android_project_migration_test.dart` from
`packages/flutter_tools/`
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/161443
* adds a new gradle task like `javaVersion` named `kgpVersion` that
prints the version of kgp.
* adds gradle_utils.dart method for getting kgp version
* * kgp method is moved to utilities and we attempt to use a plugin
method before reflection.
* adds methods or evaluating KGP + gradle and KGP + AGP compatibility.
* * It turns out that we have been using incompatible versions that
happen to work with the subset of kotlin we are using.
* Uses new kgp methods in flutter analyze --suggestions as part of the
existing agp/java/gradle compatibility matrix.
* adds new tests for all new functionality
* Adds comments to sections of the code I found could use them.
* Modifies flutter gallery to use a compatible version of kotlin and
update its lockfiles.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
This reverts commit
8dccbc33df.
Find/replace didn't catch the use of `jvmTarget = "1.8"` in
`dev/integration_tests/android_engine_test/android/app/build.gradle` and
`android_engine_test` needed to have `"com.android.application"`
updated.
Should resolve issues related to the following messages being output on
stderr:
```
warning: [options] source value 8 is obsolete and will be removed in a future release"
warning: [options] target value 8 is obsolete and will be removed in a future release
warning: [options] To suppress warnings about obsolete options, use -Xlint:-options.
```
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/165973
Fixes#162107
Commands that were helpful when working on this pr.
`dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart
--no-gradle-generation` from flutter/flutter root.
`./gradlew test` from packages/flutter_tools/gradle.
`git add -- ":*.lockfile"` for adding only lockfile changes.
`../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t
android_java11_dependency_smoke_tests` from dev/devicelab
`ktlint --editorconfig=dev/bots/test/analyze-test-input/.editorconfig
--baseline=dev/bots/test/analyze-test-input/ktlint-baseline.xml
packages/flutter_tools/gradle/src/ --format` formatting kotlin code.
Need ktlint 1.5
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/160257.
~~This will sit on CI for a bit and give me a better idea of how much
work there is to do.~~ Done!
## IMPORTANT: Do **not** revert on 1-2 isolated post-submit failures.
While I've spent the last several weeks getting this passing all
presubmit tests, and some integration tests I suspected might be
affected, it is possible that there are 1-2 integration tests that will
fail as a result of landing this PR. I'll disable the flag
(`--no-explicit-package-dependencies`) if the failures look obvious
enough, otherwise I'll revert.
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#159756
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: gmackall
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Made the tree red due to some std out.
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: gmackall
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {reidbaker}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
In preparation for changing engine builds to be unstripped by default
https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/52852, which will allow us to
make progress towards resolving
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/60240.
Tricks AGP in to downloading the NDK when building a flutter app (that
uses the FGP, which to my knowledge is all ways of building flutter
apk/aab/aar).
I want to follow this up by modifying the tool to search for the log
line that the NDK is missing (making it throw an error in that case) as
a safeguard, because that would be the last line of defense before we
accidentally build a bloated app. The safeguard won't work for add to
app, from what I understand, because while they use the FGP (so they
should be forced to be download the NDK) they don't invoke the flutter
tool, and therefore won't invoke the custom error handling of
[`gradle_errors.dart`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/packages/flutter_tools/lib/src/android/gradle_errors.dart)
Some details
1. Respects existing values for `externalNativeBuild.cmake.path` for
apps that actually use it.
2. Silences some warnings that would otherwise appear for add to app
builds or builds that manually invoke gradle:
```
C/C++: CMake Warning (dev) in CMakeLists.txt:
C/C++: No project() command is present. The top-level CMakeLists.txt file must
C/C++: contain a literal, direct call to the project() command. Add a line of
C/C++: code such as
C/C++: project(ProjectName)
C/C++: near the top of the file, but after cmake_minimum_required().
C/C++: CMake is pretending there is a "project(Project)" command on the first
C/C++: line.
C/C++: This warning is for project developers. Use -Wno-dev to suppress it.
C/C++: CMake Warning:
C/C++: Manually-specified variables were not used by the project:
C/C++: CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS
C/C++: CMAKE_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
C/C++: CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
```
3. Our ci installs the NDK at an abnormal place that AGP can't find
without help. I've modified all the `build.gradle`s that we have checked
in to point to the pre-installed path. **But some of our tests make a
new app from the templates, and those tests will now start downloading
the NDK** (as they won't be able to find it at it's current path from
templates). We could resolve this by actually fixing
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/136666. This would be a very
significant lift from what I understand - we rely on this hardcoding in
a lot of places in our infra.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/155576
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [ ] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
In preparation for changing engine builds to be unstripped by default
https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/52852, which will allow us to
make progress towards resolving
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/60240.
Tricks AGP in to downloading the NDK when building a flutter app (that
uses the FGP, which to my knowledge is all ways of building flutter
apk/aab/aar).
I want to follow this up by modifying the tool to search for the log
line that the NDK is missing (making it throw an error in that case) as
a safeguard, because that would be the last line of defense before we
accidentally build a bloated app. The safeguard won't work for add to
app, from what I understand, because while they use the FGP (so they
should be forced to be download the NDK) they don't invoke the flutter
tool, and therefore won't invoke the custom error handling of
[`gradle_errors.dart`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/packages/flutter_tools/lib/src/android/gradle_errors.dart)
Some details
1. Respects existing values for `externalNativeBuild.cmake.path` for
apps that actually use it.
2. Silences some warnings that would otherwise appear for add to app
builds or builds that manually invoke gradle:
```
C/C++: CMake Warning (dev) in CMakeLists.txt:
C/C++: No project() command is present. The top-level CMakeLists.txt file must
C/C++: contain a literal, direct call to the project() command. Add a line of
C/C++: code such as
C/C++: project(ProjectName)
C/C++: near the top of the file, but after cmake_minimum_required().
C/C++: CMake is pretending there is a "project(Project)" command on the first
C/C++: line.
C/C++: This warning is for project developers. Use -Wno-dev to suppress it.
C/C++: CMake Warning:
C/C++: Manually-specified variables were not used by the project:
C/C++: CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS
C/C++: CMAKE_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
C/C++: CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
```
3. Our ci installs the NDK at an abnormal place that AGP can't find
without help. I've modified all the `build.gradle`s that we have checked
in to point to the pre-installed path. **But some of our tests make a
new app from the templates, and those tests will now start downloading
the NDK** (as they won't be able to find it at it's current path from
templates). We could resolve this by actually fixing
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/136666. This would be a very
significant lift from what I understand - we rely on this hardcoding in
a lot of places in our infra.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/155576
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [ ] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
---------
Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com>
Reverts: flutter/flutter#157032
Initiated by: gmackall
Reason for reverting: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/157032#issuecomment-2436336078
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {reidbaker, bartekpacia}
This change reverts the following previous change:
I recently noticed the following log when building an app in verbose mode:
```
This Android Gradle plugin (8.1.0) was tested up to compileSdk = 33 (and compileSdkPreview = "UpsideDownCakePrivacySandbox").
You are strongly encouraged to update your project to use a newer
Android Gradle plugin that has been tested with compileSdk = 35.
```
It looks like AGP would like us to use a newer AGP version if we want to use compileSdk 35 (which we do). This pr upgrades the tests, in advance of updating the templates.
I recently noticed the following log when building an app in verbose mode:
```
This Android Gradle plugin (8.1.0) was tested up to compileSdk = 33 (and compileSdkPreview = "UpsideDownCakePrivacySandbox").
You are strongly encouraged to update your project to use a newer
Android Gradle plugin that has been tested with compileSdk = 35.
```
It looks like AGP would like us to use a newer AGP version if we want to use compileSdk 35 (which we do). This pr upgrades the tests, in advance of updating the templates.
Reverts: flutter/flutter#152487
Initiated by: gmackall
Reason for reverting: I forgot that I need to override the compileSdkVersion in the AGP 8.0 [instance of this test](ef9cd32f5a/dev/devicelab/bin/tasks/android_java17_dependency_smoke_tests.dart (L19))
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {reidbaker}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Updates `compileSdk`, `targetSdk`, and `ndk` versions (former 2 to latest, latter to the version of the ndk we are hosting on CIPD).
Summary of changes:
- Updates mentioned template values
- `compileSdk` 35 requires AGP 8.0+, so updated to 8.1 in many places.
- This also necessitated Gradle upgrades in most places
- This also necessitated moving the `package` xml attribute to the AGP `namespace` field in a couple places (test + template).
- Some tests use the output of `flutter create` but then use intentionally lower AGP versions. [I downgraded the `compileSdk` in these tests.](fee34fd61a)
- [Stopped lockfile generation](82324a2570) script from hitting the `hello_world` example because it uses `.kts` gradle files.
- One test needed [some Gradle options we had already added to templates](6aa187b4b6).
Updates `compileSdk`, `targetSdk`, and `ndk` versions (former 2 to latest, latter to the version of the ndk we are hosting on CIPD).
Summary of changes:
- Updates mentioned template values
- `compileSdk` 35 requires AGP 8.0+, so updated to 8.1 in many places.
- This also necessitated Gradle upgrades in most places
- This also necessitated moving the `package` xml attribute to the AGP `namespace` field in a couple places (test + template).
- Some tests use the output of `flutter create` but then use intentionally lower AGP versions. [I downgraded the `compileSdk` in these tests.](fee34fd61a)
- [Stopped lockfile generation](82324a2570) script from hitting the `hello_world` example because it uses `.kts` gradle files.
- One test needed [some Gradle options we had already added to templates](6aa187b4b6).
Reverts: flutter/flutter#150733
Initiated by: gmackall
Reason for reverting: This breaks apps that use plugins that use `compileSdk` 31, some of which we use in our postsubmit (so it blocks the tree).
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {jason-simmons}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Manual engine roll to https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53532, because the roll requires lockfile generation.
Manual recreation of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/148911
Entire PR is just the output of
```
flutter update-packages --force-upgrade
```
followed by (run from the root of the flutter repo)
```
find . -type d -name 'android' | dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-gradle-generation --no-exclusion
```
## Description
This PR simplifies one external link in a commented section of the Android manifest template.
## Related Issue
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144249
## Tests
Documentation only PR.
