mirror of
https://github.com/flutter/flutter.git
synced 2026-02-04 12:57:44 +08:00
2478 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Gray Mackall
|
77cb77b947
|
Fix verified input integration test without breaking the rest of the devicelab tests (attempt 5) (#178093)
Reland of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/178018/ On top of the above: Only gets the adb path if it is an android test, and also try catches to be doubly safe. Note that the above PR did work for the android case, so as long as we don't break the non-android case the test will be running now: https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/staging/Linux_pixel_7pro%20android_verified_input_test/228/overview ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md --------- Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com> |
||
|
auto-submit[bot]
|
cffd3ab54f
|
Reverts "Fix verified input test failure in CI (attempt 4) (#178018)" (#178089)
<!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#178018 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: jtmcdole <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: The call to `adbPath` causes the tool to fail if ANDROID isn't installed. <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: gmackall <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {mboetger} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: I think this should actually fix at least the current issue. The last PR added logs https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/178005/ And we can now see: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8699078049543853521/+/u/run_android_verified_input_test/stdout ``` [2025-11-04 18:33:56.587985] [STDOUT] stdout: [+2998 ms] Expected: <0> [2025-11-04 18:33:56.588075] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Actual: <1> [2025-11-04 18:33:56.588106] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Stdout: [2025-11-04 18:33:56.588135] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Stderr: adb server version (41) doesn't match this client (39); killing... ``` The test was directly invoking adb (using whatever is on the path), while the devicelab harness has a more complicated way of finding adb and then invoking it directly. So it seems they have found different adb versions. This pr pipes the devicelab adb path through to the individual test, so the test can reference the same adb, and then uses it. This is again sort of an abuse of this environment map (if one of the tests decided to use these environment variables we would be in a weird state), but I think it isn't too bad, and again I think it is reasonable because any android devicelab test may wish to use adb, so this solution isn't hyper specific to the problem. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com> |
||
|
Gray Mackall
|
40acb0449f
|
Fix verified input test failure in CI (attempt 4) (#178018)
I think this should actually fix at least the current issue. The last PR added logs https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/178005/ And we can now see: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8699078049543853521/+/u/run_android_verified_input_test/stdout ``` [2025-11-04 18:33:56.587985] [STDOUT] stdout: [+2998 ms] Expected: <0> [2025-11-04 18:33:56.588075] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Actual: <1> [2025-11-04 18:33:56.588106] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Stdout: [2025-11-04 18:33:56.588135] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Stderr: adb server version (41) doesn't match this client (39); killing... ``` The test was directly invoking adb (using whatever is on the path), while the devicelab harness has a more complicated way of finding adb and then invoking it directly. So it seems they have found different adb versions. This pr pipes the devicelab adb path through to the individual test, so the test can reference the same adb, and then uses it. This is again sort of an abuse of this environment map (if one of the tests decided to use these environment variables we would be in a weird state), but I think it isn't too bad, and again I think it is reasonable because any android devicelab test may wish to use adb, so this solution isn't hyper specific to the problem. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com> |
||
|
Gray Mackall
|
8124e89c63
|
Fix verified input test in CI (attempt 2) (#177961)
From looking closer at the logs, I think the failure is that the adb command isn't specifying the device. This passes locally because I only have one device, but then fails on CI. I missed this when looking at the [logs](https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8699178787799824705/+/u/run_android_verified_input_test/stdout) originally: ``` [2025-11-03 15:50:32.967241] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] test_driver/main_test.dart 34:40 main.<fn>.<fn> [2025-11-03 15:50:35.960806] [STDOUT] stdout: [+2993 ms] Expected: <0> [2025-11-03 15:50:35.960858] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Actual: <1> [2025-11-03 15:50:35.960898] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] package:matcher/src/expect/expect.dart 149:31 fail [2025-11-03 15:50:35.960906] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] package:matcher/src/expect/expect.dart 144:3 _expect [2025-11-03 15:50:35.960946] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] package:matcher/src/expect/expect.dart 56:3 expect [2025-11-03 15:50:35.960957] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] test_driver/main_test.dart 44:7 main.<fn> ``` The failed expect there isn't related to the verification, it is an expect on the exit code of the adb command: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/dev/integration_tests/android_verified_input/test_driver/main_test.dart#L44 So the adb command is failing on CI. I think it is for the reason above. This change makes the device id available to the driver tests that are run by the devicelab harness, and then pipes it through to ADB. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com> |
||
|
Gray Mackall
|
eeff54df43
|
Speculative fix for android_verified_input_test (#177937)
This test passes when run locally as instructed in the README for the devicelab ``` ../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t android_verified_input_test ``` but fails on CI: https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/staging/Linux_pixel_7pro%20android_verified_input_test/106/overview ``` [2025-11-03 11:08:04.090018] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Original error: ext.flutter.driver: (-32000) Service connection disposed [2025-11-03 11:08:04.090156] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Original stack trace: [2025-11-03 11:08:04.090199] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] #0 new _OutstandingRequest (package:vm_service/src/vm_service.dart:268:34) [2025-11-03 11:08:04.091572] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] #1 VmService._call.<anonymous closure> (package:vm_service/src/vm_service.dart:1950:25) [2025-11-03 11:08:04.091647] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] #2 VmService._call (package:vm_service/src/vm_service.dart:1962:8) [2025-11-03 11:08:04.091674] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] #3 VmService.callServiceExtension (package:vm_service/src/vm_service.dart:1901:14) [2025-11-03 11:08:04.091693] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] #4 VMServiceFlutterDriver.sendCommand (package:flutter_driver/src/driver/vmservice_driver.dart:327:12) [2025-11-03 11:08:04.091713] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] #5 FlutterDriver.requestData (package:flutter_driver/src/driver/driver.dart:573:13) [2025-11-03 11:08:04.091733] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] #6 main.<anonymous closure> (file:///opt/s/w/ir/x/w/rc/tmpv6pcbna2/flutter%20sdk/dev/integration_tests/android_verified_input/test_driver/main_test.dart:28:57) [2025-11-03 11:08:04.091750] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] <asynchronous suspension> [2025-11-03 11:08:04.091767] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] #7 Declarer.test.<anonymous closure>.<anonymous closure> (package:test_api/src/backend/declarer.dart:242:9) [2025-11-03 11:08:04.091784] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] <asynchronous suspension> [2025-11-03 11:08:04.092408] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] #8 Declarer.test.<anonymous closure> (package:test_api/src/backend/declarer.dart:240:7) [2025-11-03 11:08:04.092472] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] <asynchronous suspension> [2025-11-03 11:08:04.092502] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] #9 Invoker._waitForOutstandingCallbacks.<anonymous closure> (package:test_api/src/backend/invoker.dart:282:9) ``` Try copying this configuration used by other tests as a speculative fix. I can't get this test to kick off in presubmit, so I suppose we will just try this. The test is marked bringup anyways so it won't block the tree if this doesn't help. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md --------- Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com> |
||
|
Gray Mackall
|
48c77daf85
|
Re-enable android verified input devicelab test (#177804)
This was originally landed in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/140836/ but the pr did not hook it up to ci. It was then removed in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/162895/ First got the driver test running: `flutter drive -t lib/main.dart --driver test_driver/main_test.dart` from the directory of the test app then got the devicelab harness working via `../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t android_verified_input_test` from the `dev/devicelab` directory and then finally hooked up to ci with the configuration in the `.ci.yaml` Restoring in a passing state, in advance of landing https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/177572/ ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md --------- Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com> |
||
|
jesswrd
|
3c04c999c1
|
Bump Templates To Correct Versions (#177416)
I bumped templates to the correct versions. I also included a fix for kgp and agp compatability. AGP 8.11.0 -> 8.11.1 Gradle 8.13 -> 8.14 KGP 2.2.0 -> 2.2.20 I ran `flutter analyze --suggestions` and `flutter build apk` to ensure these are safe versions. Will cherry pick this to beta after the pr merges. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/177320 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Matej Knopp
|
c52370113d
|
[macOS] Implement regular window (#176361)
<!-- Thanks for filing a pull request! Reviewers are typically assigned within a week of filing a request. To learn more about code review, see our documentation on Tree Hygiene: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md --> *Replace this paragraph with a description of what this PR is changing or adding, and why. Consider including before/after screenshots.* *List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue. An issue is not required if the PR fixes something trivial like a typo.* *If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].* ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [ ] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md --------- Co-authored-by: Matthew Kosarek <matt.kosarek@canonical.com> |
||
|
jesswrd
|
9f76287ff5
|
Bump AGP, KGP, Gradle Templates (#176858)
Bumped template versions: AGP 8.9.1 -> 8.11.0 KGP 2.1.0 -> 2.2.0 Gradle 8.12 -> 8.13 Ran `flutter analyze suggestions` to check for versioning compatability. Ran `flutter build apk` on a new flutter app to ensure successful build. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [ ] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Robert Ancell
|
cb94cc0705
|
Implement Regular Windows for Linux (#176187) | ||
|
Victoria Ashworth
|
00da9435e3
|
Rename UIScene integration test projects and fix Xcode compatibility (#176635)
This PR renames the UIScene integration test projects, makes them compatible with Xcode 16, and organizes the tests. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Victoria Ashworth
|
5c66c53a31
|
Handle FlutterEngine registration when embedded in Multi-Scene apps (#176490)
When Multi-Scene is enabled, Flutter cannot automatically associate the engine with a scene during the scene connection phase in most cases. However, the `scene:willConnectToSession:options:` event is critical for some Flutter plugins that rely on scene connection options (the scene-equivalent of application launch options). To workaround this, this PR adds two things: * Adds a way to manually register a `FlutterEngine` with a `FlutterPluginSceneLifeCycleDelegate`. Manually registered engines must also be manually unregistered. * This use case is for add to app * Automatically registers a `FlutterEngine` if the `rootViewController` of the scene is a `FlutterViewController` * This use case is for if a Flutter app (not add-to-app) were to enable multi-scene since the `rootViewController` of the storyboard is a `FlutterViewController` This PR also makes a fix for when a `FlutterView` is removed from the scene: * If a `FlutterView` is removed from a scene, keep the `FlutterEngine` associated with the scene until it is assigned to a new scene ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Victoria Ashworth
|
01474413c5
|
Add an AppDelegate callback for implicit FlutterEngines (#176240)
This PR introduces a new protocol `FlutterImplicitEngineDelegate`, which
adds a callback called `didInitializeImplicitFlutterEngine`, which
returns a new interface called `FlutterImplicitEngineBridge`.
This was added to expose parts of an implicit `FlutterEngine`, such as
when created from a `FlutterViewController` in a storyboard.
``` swift diff
@objc class AppDelegate: FlutterAppDelegate, FlutterImplicitEngineDelegate {
override func application(
_ application: UIApplication,
didFinishLaunchingWithOptions launchOptions: [UIApplication.LaunchOptionsKey: Any]?
) -> Bool {
return super.application(application, didFinishLaunchingWithOptions: launchOptions)
}
}
func didInitializeImplicitFlutterEngine(_ engineBridge: FlutterImplicitEngineBridge) {
// Register plugins with `engineBridge.pluginRegistry`
GeneratedPluginRegistrant.register(with: engineBridge.pluginRegistry)
// Create method channels with `engineBridge.applicationRegistrar.messenger()`
let batteryChannel = FlutterMethodChannel(
name: "samples.flutter.dev/battery",
binaryMessenger: engineBridge.applicationRegistrar.messenger()
)
...
// Create platform views with `engineBridge.applicationRegistrar.messenger()`
let factory = FLNativeViewFactory(messenger: engineBridge.applicationRegistrar.messenger())
...
}
```
This PR also refactors `FlutterPluginRegistrar` into 3 separate
protocols:
* `FlutterBaseRegistrar`
* `FlutterApplicationRegistrar`
* `FlutterPluginRegistrar`
Most methods are moved from `FlutterPluginRegistrar` to
`FlutterBaseRegistrar` and then `FlutterPluginRegistrar` and
`FlutterApplicationRegistrar` inherit from `FlutterBaseRegistrar`.
`FlutterPluginRegistrar` also has additional methods specific to it -
there are no meaningful/breaking changes to `FlutterPluginRegistrar`.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/173357.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
**Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code
Assist for
GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code).
Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as
authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments
useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or
disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team
member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be
addressed.
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
|
||
|
Victoria Ashworth
|
b3ecbb9034
|
Add state restoration for UIScene migration (#176305)
When an iOS app migrates to UIScene, the application events for handling state restoration are no longer called by UIKit. Instead, scene events in the SceneDelegate must be used. This PR adds support for handling state restoration in UIScene while still maintaining support for unmigrated apps, as well. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/174402. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Victoria Ashworth
|
80496d7662
|
Add SwiftUI support for UIScene migration (#176230)
When embedding Flutter in a SwiftUI app, it appears that SwiftUI wraps the scene delegate given by the developer in an internal class called `SwiftUI.AppSceneDelegate`. This causes the scene delegate to fail to check if it conforms to the `FlutterSceneLifeCycleProvider` protocol - even though it does. However, after force casting it, selectors respond and can be used. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Victoria Ashworth
|
7c5e70191f
|
Add verbose logs to module_uiscene_test_ios (#176306)
Debugging why https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/staging/Mac%20module_uiscene_test_ios is failing. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Victoria Ashworth
|
7382e9361f
|
Add scene plugin lifecycle events (#175866)
This PR forwards scene lifecycle events from the SceneDelegate to
registered plugins.
This PR introduced 3 new public APIs:
* `FlutterSceneLifeCycleDelegate` (protocol) - This is the protocol that
plugins conform to
* `FlutterSceneLifeCycleProvider` (protocol) - This is the protocol that
a SceneDelegate can conform to instead of `FlutterSceneDelegate`
* `FlutterPluginSceneLifeCycleDelegate` (interface) - This is the class
object that a SceneDelegate using `FlutterSceneLifeCycleProvider` can
use to forward scene events to
The flow of events are as followed when SceneDelegate subclasses the
`FlutterSceneDelegate`:
* `FlutterSceneDelegate` receives `sceneDidBecomeActive` event from
UIKit
* `FlutterSceneDelegate` forwards `sceneDidBecomeActive` to
`FlutterPluginSceneLifeCycleDelegate`
* `FlutterPluginSceneLifeCycleDelegate` loops through each
`FlutterEngine` it has and forwards `sceneDidBecomeActive` to the
engine's `FlutterEnginePluginSceneLifeCycleDelegate`
* `FlutterEnginePluginSceneLifeCycleDelegate` loops through each plugin
that conforms to `FlutterSceneLifeCycleDelegate` it has and forwards
`sceneDidBecomeActive` to the plugin
* `FlutterPluginSceneLifeCycleDelegate` forwards `sceneDidBecomeActive`
to `FlutterPluginAppLifeCycleDelegate` using
`sceneDidBecomeActiveFallback`
* `FlutterPluginAppLifeCycleDelegate` loops through all plugins and
calls `applicationDidBecomeActive` if the plugin does not conform to
`FlutterSceneLifeCycleDelegate`
When using `FlutterSceneLifeCycleProvider` instead of
`FlutterSceneDelegate`, scene events are manually forwarded to
`FlutterPluginSceneLifeCycleDelegate` by the iOS developer. For example:
```swift
class SceneDelegate: UIResponder, UIWindowSceneDelegate, FlutterSceneLifeCycleProvider {
var sceneLifeCycleDelegate: FlutterPluginSceneLifeCycleDelegate = FlutterPluginSceneLifeCycleDelegate()
func sceneDidBecomeActive(_ scene: UIScene) {
sceneLifeCycleDelegate.sceneDidBecomeActive(scene)
}
```
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/174398.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
**Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code
Assist for
GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code).
Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as
authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments
useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or
disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team
member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be
addressed.
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
|
||
|
Matthew Kosarek
|
97c11cf89a
|
Implement Regular Windows for the win32 framework + add an example application for regular windows (#173715)
## What's new?
- Implement and test `_window_win32.dart`, the Win32 implementation of
`_window.dart` 🎉
- Wrote a bunch of tests in `window_win32_test.dart` which uses a mock
API barrier to mock the native Win32 layer
- Update `BaseWindowController` to extend `ChangeNotifier` and use it to
inform the `WindowScope` of when things change
- Made `RegularWindowController.empty()` a non-internal constructor, as
it is needed by implementations
- Added a _large_ example application for windowing where users can test
out different windowing concepts and see how they work!
To test, simply run the tests or try out the example app!
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
|
||
|
Matt Boetger
|
2d5c26c0dc
|
In Gradle Flutter task, correctly replace '\ ' with ' '. (#175815)
Gradle does not like paths with '\ ' in them. Fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/174043 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [X] I signed the [CLA]. - [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [X] All existing and new tests are passing. |
||
|
Byoungchan Lee
|
dbeb08ad9d
|
Update maximum known Gradle version to 9.1.0 (#175543)
Gradle 9.1.0 was released on 2025-09-18. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [ ] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. |
||
|
Harry Terkelsen
|
06ecbba302
|
[benchmarks] Allow passing --local-web-sdk and --build-mode flags to benchmarks (#175199)
This allows setting the `--local-web-sdk` and `--build-mode` flags to benchmarks. This makes it easier to debug benchmarks that only fail with local engine changes. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Elijah Okoroh
|
1eab8e1d13
|
Deprecate Objective-C plugin template (#174003)
This PR marks the `--ios-language objc` flag as deprecated for plugin creation. It introduces a warning message in the `flutter create` tool when the flag is used, but **does not** remove the functionality at this time. This is the first step towards its eventual removal. ## Context As discussed in the issue, usage metrics show that Objective-C is used in less than 4% of newly created plugins. To streamline the tool and align with modern iOS development practices (i.e., Swift), we are beginning the process of phasing out this option **Changes:** - Adds a deprecation warning to the CLI when the `objc` flag is used. - Updates the `--help` text to reflect the deprecation. - Removes obsolete tests for Objective-C plugin creation and usage tracking. ## Testing I have validated these changes by: 1. Manually running `flutter-dev create` with the `objc` flag to confirm the new deprecation warning appears. 2. Verifying that creating a plugin without the --ios-language flag does **not** trigger the warning. 3. Running the tests in the `test/commands.shard` to ensure no regressions were introduced. 4. CI will validate the changes to the devicelab tests. Fixes #169683 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [X] I signed the [CLA]. - [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [X] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Ben Konyi
|
87d5b75319
|
[ Device Lab ] Add regression testing for flutter/flutter#174952 (#174956)
Also switches to using a regex group to match the device state instead of splitting the matched string on '='. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/174952 --------- Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Ben Konyi
|
850412cfee
|
[ Device Lab ] Fix wakefulness check to only match log entries with string values (#174953)
Sometimes there can be multiple wakefulness log entries (e.g., 'mWakefulness=Awake' and 'mWakefulness=1'), but we only care about the entry with a string value. --------- Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Camille Simon
|
0c258ce6c5
|
[Android] Break up plugin_test integration tests (#174728)
Breaks up the `* plugin_test` integration test taks into `* plugin_test_android` (contains no/low Android code) and `* package_test_android` (contains Android code) and lowers the timeout to 45 minutes (conservative guess) to accommodate the change. This is meant to address https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/174116 as per [this suggestion](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/174116#issuecomment-3206034986); let me know if this looks reasonable! The test sometimes times out on Windows due to running a clean build without caching. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [ ] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [ ] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [ ] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [ ] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [ ] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Ben Konyi
|
33edd49421
|
[ Tool ] Remove support for experimental --fast-start feature (#173576)
This feature never worked correctly and has been disabled by default for years. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/49499 |
||
|
Jamil Saadeh
|
f26eddba00
|
Null aware elements clean-ups (#173074)
<!-- Thanks for filing a pull request! Reviewers are typically assigned within a week of filing a request. To learn more about code review, see our documentation on Tree Hygiene: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md --> Converted more null checks to null aware elements. The analyzer had many false negatives and the regex became pretty wild to find many of them 😂 I've found more in the engine folder but I'll apply the changes in a separate PR Part of #172188 *If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].* ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Ben Konyi
|
8c358779aa
|
[ Tool ] Fix run_linux_chrome_dev_mode (#173647)
It's possible for Chrome to open with two tabs pointing to localhost, which was causing this test to fail. This change updates the Chrome connection logic to look for the specific URL Chrome was told to navigate to at launch, if one was provided. |
||
|
Ben Konyi
|
c4ce6a8ef7
|
Reapply "Make device debuggable if useDwdsWebSocketConnection is true … (#173551)" (#173628)
This reverts commit
|
||
|
Victoria Ashworth
|
cb4dfc05f3
|
Update integration test for iOS deployment workflows (#173566)
The previous integration test only tested one workflow, so I re-designed the test to be able to test both workflows and validate the correct commands are being used. Follow up to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/173443. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
auto-submit[bot]
|
17c92b7ba6
|
Reverts "Reapply "Make device debuggable if useDwdsWebSocketConnection is true … (#173551)" (#173568)" (#173587)
<!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#173568 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: bkonyi <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: Chrome isn't configured for the test configuration and is causing failures. <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: bkonyi <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {jyameo, matanlurey} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: This reverts commit e2a347b14a18729dd24c2cf3240ef22562195e2d. Previously reverted due to `*_chrome_dev_mode` tests failing on all platforms. <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com> |
||
|
Ben Konyi
|
a9fc145a3d
|
Reapply "Make device debuggable if useDwdsWebSocketConnection is true … (#173551)" (#173568)
This reverts commit e2a347b14a18729dd24c2cf3240ef22562195e2d. Previously reverted due to `*_chrome_dev_mode` tests failing on all platforms. |
||
|
Victoria Ashworth
|
9cb1bc0cfd
|
Update CI iOS tests (#173563)
We no longer have iOS 17 in our CI so we can remove it from the ci.yaml. I also removed a test we no longer need. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148975. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Victoria Ashworth
|
38217906e9
|
Use LLDB as the default debugging method for iOS 17+ and Xcode 26+ (#173443)
This PR introduces a new feature flag called `lldb-debugging`, which is turned on by default. When this feature is turned on, if deploying to a physical iOS 17+ device with Xcode 26+, it will use a mixture of `devicectl` and `lldb` to install, launch, and debug the app. If LLDB fails, it will fallback to use Xcode automation. If LLDB times out, it will warn the user they may want to disable it. If LLDB is disabled, it will use Xcode automation. This PR also adds analytics to track what deployment method is used and if it's successful. Part 2 and 3 of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/173416. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144218. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/133465. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Matthew Kosarek
|
69264e4a60
|
Add the 'windowing' feature flag and use to wrap an implementation for regular windows that always throws (#172478)
## What's new? - Added the `windowing` feature flag to the project - Created the internal `_window.dart` API with support for regular windows - Implemented a `_WindowingOwnerUnsupported` implementation of the `WindowingOwner` interface - Marked all points of the public API as `@internal` with a corresponding warning documentation - Threw an `UnsupportedError` where it is appropriate to do so Note that this PR does **NOT** include a real implementation of `WindowingOwner` (e.g. for win32 or macOS). That work will be opened as a follow up. This work is based off of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697 and http://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437, as well as this design document: https://docs.flutter.dev/go/multi-window-experimental-apis ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. --------- Co-authored-by: Loïc Sharma <737941+loic-sharma@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Jenn Magder
|
af294893d9
|
Move android_obfuscate_test from devicelab into tools integration.shard (#169798)
`android_obfuscate_test` is currently being schedule to run on a limited devicelab physical phone bot. However, it's only checking if `--obfuscate` works, not running anything on the device, so can move into the tools test integration shard. https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Linux_pixel_7pro%20android_obfuscate_test/7722/overview The test only takes < 2 minutes, spinning up an entire build for it, especially on a devicelab bot, is wasteful. Similar to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/80161 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Ricardo Dalarme
|
56d5389456
|
Migrate to null aware elements - Part 5 (#172418)
## Description Continuing the work from @jamilsaadeh97 to replace verbose null checks with modern [null_aware_elements](https://dart.dev/tools/linter-rules/use_null_aware_elements) syntax. This PR cleans up the remaining files not covered in the previous parts, making the code more concise. ## Related PRs - https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/172198 - https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/172306 - https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/172307 - https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/172322 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. |
||
|
Matan Lurey
|
0e7da1d019
|
Remove deprecated AssetManifest.json file (#172594)
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143577. |
||
|
Mikhail Novoseltsev
|
adca65f43f
|
[Android] remove obsolete gradle api in FGP (#172085)
fixes #170791 This PR replaces the deprecated (and removed in 9.0) Gradle fileMode API in favor of filePermissions. This change finally unlocks builds with gradle 9 (confirmed in smoke tests, 9.0.0-rc.2 is the latest prerelease version to the date). **Testing strategy** There's an attempt to add a Kotlin unit test that confirms that `filePermissions` were called during plugin application. I failed to find a more precise way to check if the new code works as intended (such as testing that permissions were really changed or something like that), but on the other hand, it should not be required since it will transform the test in a way that it will start to test Gradle APIs and their behavior, and I believe it's a bit out of scope: Gradle APIs are tested in Gradle tests :) Anyway, this new test is a bit cumbersome because it's required to mock all the behaviours related to variants configuration and capturing calls – If it is not desired im not hesitant to remove it. <!-- Thanks for filing a pull request! Reviewers are typically assigned within a week of filing a request. To learn more about code review, see our documentation on Tree Hygiene: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md --> ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Loïc Sharma
|
6474b04e6d
|
Reland "Add feature flags to the framework" (#171545)
This relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437. The google3 fixes were landed in: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/171547, https://critique.corp.google.com/cl/781275353, https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/171933. This PR is split into two commits: 1. d6253794e8982348c5c21cb63e8f6bf785664be6, code from https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437 without any changes 2. f35d29e4af630d2d4fdb0cda8686b6ff9f77227a, updates the PR to omit obvious types. Original PR description: ## Motivation We'd like to let users opt-in to experimental features so that they can give early feedback while we iterate on the feature. For example: Example feature flags: 1. Android sensitive content: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/158473. When enabled, Flutter will tell Android when the view contains sensitive content like a password. 3. Desktop multi-window. When enabled, Flutter will use child windows to allow things like a context menu to "escape" outside of the current window. ### Use case Users will be able to turn on features by: * **Option 1**: Run `flutter config --enable-my-feature`. This enables the feature for all projects on the machine * **Option 2**: Add `enable-my-feature: true` in their `pubspec.yaml`, under the `flutter` section. This would enable the for a single project on the machine. Turning on a feature affects _both_ development-time (`flutter run`) and deployment-time (`flutter build x`). For example, I can `flutter build windows` to create an `.exe` with multi-window features enabled. ## How this works This adds a new [`runtimeId`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-0ded384225f19a4c34d43c7c11f7cb084ff3db947cfa82d8d52fc94c112bb2a7R243-R247) property to the tool's `Feature` class. If a feature is on and has a `runtimeId`, its `runtimeId` will be [stamped into the Dart application as a Dart define](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-bd662448bdc2e6f50e47cd3b20b22b41a828561bce65cb4d54ea4f5011cc604eR293-R327). The framework uses this Dart define to [determine which features are enabled](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-c8dbd5cd3103bc5be53c4ac5be8bdb9bf73e10cd5d8e4ac34e737fd1f8602d45). ### Multi-window example https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697 shows how this new feature flag system can be used to add a multi-window feature flag: 1. It adds a new [multi-window feature](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-0ded384225f19a4c34d43c7c11f7cb084ff3db947cfa82d8d52fc94c112bb2a7R189-R198) to the Flutter tool. This can be turned on using `flutter config --enable-multi-window` or by putting `enable-multi-window: true` in an app's .pubspec, under the `flutter` section. 2. It adds a new [`isMultiWindowEnabled`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-c8dbd5cd3103bc5be53c4ac5be8bdb9bf73e10cd5d8e4ac34e737fd1f8602d45R7-R11) property to the framework. 4. The Material library can use this new property to determine whether it should create a new window. [Example](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-2cbc1634ed6b61d61dfa090e7bfbbb7c60b74c8abc3a28df6f79eee691fd1b73). ## Limitations ### Tool and framework only For now, these feature flags are available only to the Flutter tool and Flutter framework. The flags are not automatically available to the embedder or the engine. For example, embedders need to configure their surfaces differently if Impeller is enabled. This configuration must happen before the Dart isolate is launched. As a result, the framework's feature flags is not a viable solution for this scenario for now. For these kinds of scenarios, we should continue to use platform-specific configuration like the `AndroidManifest.xml` or `Info.plist` files. This is a fixable limitation, we just need to invest in this plumbing :) ### Tree shaking Feature flags are not designed to help tree shaking. For example, you cannot conditionally import Dart code depending on the enabled feature flags. Code that is feature flagged off will still be imported into user's apps. |
||
|
Reid Baker
|
7762b4cf32
|
Bump warn and error versions of agp, kotlin and gradle versions in preparation for gradle 9 (#171776)
- **Relands "Bump warn and error versions of agp, kotlin and gradle versions in preparation for gradle 9 (#171399)"** - **bump lockfile generator to use kotlin 2.1.0** - **Update formatting of lockfile to pass ktlint** Updated lockfiles with `JAVA_HOME=/opt/homebrew/opt/openjdk@17/libexec/openjdk.jdk/Contents/Home/ dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart` after dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart to bump the versions of kotlin. Failing tests from first attempt https://flutter-dashboard.appspot.com/#/build?hashFilter=84a5ce765d193a9c79ab4297f367d5ad7efc5dac&showMac=false&showWindows=false&showiOS=false&showLinux=false&showBringup=true&repo=flutter&branch=master Verified example test that cause revert was passing by running the following - `../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t run_debug_test_android.dart` from `dev/devicelab` - `../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t run_release_test` from `dev/devicelab` - `SHARD=android_engine_vulkan_tests bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart dev/bots/test.dart` from root with an android emulator. Hard to actually verify because the emulator is closed as part of the tests but no failures were from failures to compile. - `flutter test test/general.shard/android/android_project_migration_test.dart` from `packages/flutter_tools/` ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. |
||
|
Ben Konyi
|
a5541161e8
|
[ Tool ] Remove long-deprecated make-host-app-editable (#171715)
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/59220 |
||
|
auto-submit[bot]
|
9b0f94aef6
|
Reverts "Bump warn and error versions of agp, kotlin and gradle versions in preparation for gradle 9 (#171399)" (#171736)
<!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#171399 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: matanlurey <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: Many Gradle/Android related tasks are failing ([one example](https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Mac_mokey%20run_release_test/1347/overview)) <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: reidbaker <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {gmackall} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: https://gradle.org/whats-new/gradle-9/ is coming and with it includes some deprecated methods. Some like https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/171397 can be fixed by annotations and calling new methods. Some like the deprecation of minsdkversion on Variant require bumping the minimum versions to be able to compile code that will work. b/368604254 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com> |
||
|
Reid Baker
|
84a5ce765d
|
Bump warn and error versions of agp, kotlin and gradle versions in preparation for gradle 9 (#171399)
https://gradle.org/whats-new/gradle-9/ is coming and with it includes some deprecated methods. Some like https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/171397 can be fixed by annotations and calling new methods. Some like the deprecation of minsdkversion on Variant require bumping the minimum versions to be able to compile code that will work. b/368604254 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. |
||
|
Kate Lovett
|
a04fb324be
|
Bump Dart to 3.8 and reformat (#171703)
Bumps the Dart version to 3.8 across the repo (excluding engine/src/flutter/third_party) and applies formatting updates from Dart 3.8. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
auto-submit[bot]
|
c2cd71309f
|
Reverts "Add feature flags to the framework (#168437)" (#171542)
<!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#168437 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: chingjun <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: broke internal customers <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: loic-sharma <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {bkonyi, justinmc, matanlurey} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: ## Motivation We'd like to let users opt-in to experimental features so that they can give early feedback while we iterate on the feature. For example: Example feature flags: 1. Android sensitive content: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/158473. When enabled, Flutter will tell Android when the view contains sensitive content like a password. 2. Desktop multi-window. When enabled, Flutter will use child windows to allow things like a context menu to "escape" outside of the current window. ### Use case Users will be able to turn on features by: * **Option 1**: Run `flutter config --enable-my-feature`. This enables the feature for all projects on the machine * **Option 2**: Add `enable-my-feature: true` in their `pubspec.yaml`, under the `flutter` section. This would enable the for a single project on the machine. Turning on a feature affects _both_ development-time (`flutter run`) and deployment-time (`flutter build x`). For example, I can `flutter build windows` to create an `.exe` with multi-window features enabled. ## How this works This adds a new [`runtimeId`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-0ded384225f19a4c34d43c7c11f7cb084ff3db947cfa82d8d52fc94c112bb2a7R243-R247) property to the tool's `Feature` class. If a feature is on and has a `runtimeId`, its `runtimeId` will be [stamped into the Dart application as a Dart define](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-bd662448bdc2e6f50e47cd3b20b22b41a828561bce65cb4d54ea4f5011cc604eR293-R327). The framework uses this Dart define to [determine which features are enabled](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-c8dbd5cd3103bc5be53c4ac5be8bdb9bf73e10cd5d8e4ac34e737fd1f8602d45). ### Multi-window example https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697 shows how this new feature flag system can be used to add a multi-window feature flag: 1. It adds a new [multi-window feature](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-0ded384225f19a4c34d43c7c11f7cb084ff3db947cfa82d8d52fc94c112bb2a7R189-R198) to the Flutter tool. This can be turned on using `flutter config --enable-multi-window` or by putting `enable-multi-window: true` in an app's .pubspec, under the `flutter` section. 2. It adds a new [`isMultiWindowEnabled`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-c8dbd5cd3103bc5be53c4ac5be8bdb9bf73e10cd5d8e4ac34e737fd1f8602d45R7-R11) property to the framework. 3. The Material library can use this new property to determine whether it should create a new window. [Example](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-2cbc1634ed6b61d61dfa090e7bfbbb7c60b74c8abc3a28df6f79eee691fd1b73). ## Limitations ### Tool and framework only For now, these feature flags are available only to the Flutter tool and Flutter framework. The flags are not automatically available to the embedder or the engine. For example, embedders need to configure their surfaces differently if Impeller is enabled. This configuration must happen before the Dart isolate is launched. As a result, the framework's feature flags is not a viable solution for this scenario for now. For these kinds of scenarios, we should continue to use platform-specific configuration like the `AndroidManifest.xml` or `Info.plist` files. This is a fixable limitation, we just need to invest in this plumbing :) ### Tree shaking Feature flags are not designed to help tree shaking. For example, you cannot conditionally import Dart code depending on the enabled feature flags. Code that is feature flagged off will still be imported into user's apps. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com> |
||
|
Loïc Sharma
|
c6f9e801b2
|
Add feature flags to the framework (#168437)
## Motivation We'd like to let users opt-in to experimental features so that they can give early feedback while we iterate on the feature. For example: Example feature flags: 1. Android sensitive content: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/158473. When enabled, Flutter will tell Android when the view contains sensitive content like a password. 2. Desktop multi-window. When enabled, Flutter will use child windows to allow things like a context menu to "escape" outside of the current window. ### Use case Users will be able to turn on features by: * **Option 1**: Run `flutter config --enable-my-feature`. This enables the feature for all projects on the machine * **Option 2**: Add `enable-my-feature: true` in their `pubspec.yaml`, under the `flutter` section. This would enable the for a single project on the machine. Turning on a feature affects _both_ development-time (`flutter run`) and deployment-time (`flutter build x`). For example, I can `flutter build windows` to create an `.exe` with multi-window features enabled. ## How this works This adds a new [`runtimeId`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-0ded384225f19a4c34d43c7c11f7cb084ff3db947cfa82d8d52fc94c112bb2a7R243-R247) property to the tool's `Feature` class. If a feature is on and has a `runtimeId`, its `runtimeId` will be [stamped into the Dart application as a Dart define](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-bd662448bdc2e6f50e47cd3b20b22b41a828561bce65cb4d54ea4f5011cc604eR293-R327). The framework uses this Dart define to [determine which features are enabled](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-c8dbd5cd3103bc5be53c4ac5be8bdb9bf73e10cd5d8e4ac34e737fd1f8602d45). ### Multi-window example https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697 shows how this new feature flag system can be used to add a multi-window feature flag: 1. It adds a new [multi-window feature](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-0ded384225f19a4c34d43c7c11f7cb084ff3db947cfa82d8d52fc94c112bb2a7R189-R198) to the Flutter tool. This can be turned on using `flutter config --enable-multi-window` or by putting `enable-multi-window: true` in an app's .pubspec, under the `flutter` section. 2. It adds a new [`isMultiWindowEnabled`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-c8dbd5cd3103bc5be53c4ac5be8bdb9bf73e10cd5d8e4ac34e737fd1f8602d45R7-R11) property to the framework. 3. The Material library can use this new property to determine whether it should create a new window. [Example](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-2cbc1634ed6b61d61dfa090e7bfbbb7c60b74c8abc3a28df6f79eee691fd1b73). ## Limitations ### Tool and framework only For now, these feature flags are available only to the Flutter tool and Flutter framework. The flags are not automatically available to the embedder or the engine. For example, embedders need to configure their surfaces differently if Impeller is enabled. This configuration must happen before the Dart isolate is launched. As a result, the framework's feature flags is not a viable solution for this scenario for now. For these kinds of scenarios, we should continue to use platform-specific configuration like the `AndroidManifest.xml` or `Info.plist` files. This is a fixable limitation, we just need to invest in this plumbing :) ### Tree shaking Feature flags are not designed to help tree shaking. For example, you cannot conditionally import Dart code depending on the enabled feature flags. Code that is feature flagged off will still be imported into user's apps. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Reid Baker
|
1dfb59d281
|
Android min sdk 24 part 1 (#170882)
- **bump template version, update migration code to handle api 21-23 and expand it to cover multiple min api level definitions** - **bump add to app project to minimum api level 24** - **PathUtilsTest converted to using config, removed test code that branched on versions older than 24** - **Update additional build.gradle files to have minsdk 24 and documenation** Related to #170807 G3 cls - espresso https://critique.corp.google.com/cl/776592881 - integration tests cl/778034198 - removal of pre api 23 samples tests cl/777652802 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. --------- Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <34871572+gmackall@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Jason Simmons
|
2773c0c8e1
|
Log stack traces from exceptions thrown by devicelab test tasks (#171165) | ||
|
Victoria Ashworth
|
d49d805ea3
|
Add LLDB warnings (#170827)
LLDB is now required again for iOS 26+ so add back warnings. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |