<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#169451
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: matanlurey
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Broke a number of post-submit tests
(ios_app_extension, packages_autoroller).
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: mosuem
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {matanlurey}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
Reland after #169357.
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
Reland after #169357.
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
This change removes references to Observatory, including:
- Deprecated flags
- Deprecated embedder APIs
- Outdated documentation
- Documentation instances where "VM service" should have been used
- Incorrectly named tests / directories
As a part of this change, `--serve-observatory` is no longer a valid
flag.
Observatory is still available for now via the `_serveObservatory` RPC,
but will be removed in a follow up PR once we've prepared for breakages
in G3.
Work towards https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/50233
FYI @a-siva
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#169276
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: vashworth
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Causing google testing failures
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: gaaclarke
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {vashworth}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
## **BREAKING CHANGE**
Adopting Apple's UISceneDelegate protocol shifts the initialization
order of apps. For the common cases we've made sure they will work
without change. The one case that will require a change is any app that
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]` assumes that
`UIApplicationDelegate.window.rootViewController` is a
`FlutterViewController` instance. This is sometimes done to register
platform channels directly on the `FlutterViewController`. Instead users
should use the `FlutterPluginRegistry` API's to create platform channels
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]`, like
`FlutterPlugin`s do.
An example can be seen here:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168914/files#diff-9f59c5248b58124beca7e290a57646023cda3ca024607092c6c6932606ce16ee
In extreme cases, like bespoke test harnesses, the startup logic can be
moved to `-[FlutterViewController awakeFromNib]` in a
FlutterViewController subclass.
An example can be seen here:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/169276/files#diff-dbe39c23a0a380447b90b7559a878dae8564616e0875c4ef0d9e99e02b91adac
## Changes since revert
I changed the init in `//dev/integration_tests/external_textures` from
the UIApplicationDelegate to the FlutterViewController's awakeFromNib.
This is a more appropriate place for initialization post-UISceneDelegate
since it avoids the launch engine altogether. I tried avoiding to make
the big change to prove we could do a small change to migrate that
project. I don't think this big refactor is indicative of what users
will experience. There was a timing assumption in the integration test
that required not using the launch engine at all.
## Description
fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/167267
design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZfcQOs-UKRa9jsFG84-MTFeibZTLKCvPQLxF2eskx44/edit?tab=t.0
relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168396
relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168914
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
## **BREAKING CHANGE**
Adopting Apple's UISceneDelegate protocol shifts the initialization
order of apps. For the common cases we've made sure they will work
without change. The one case that will require a change is any app that
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]` assumes that
`UIApplicationDelegate.window.rootViewController` is a
`FlutterViewController` instance. This is sometimes done to register
platform channels directly on the `FlutterViewController`. Instead users
should use the `FlutterPluginRegistry` API's to create platform channels
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]`, like
`FlutterPlugin`s do.
An example can be seen here:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168914/files#diff-9f59c5248b58124beca7e290a57646023cda3ca024607092c6c6932606ce16ee
In extreme cases, like bespoke test harnesses, the startup logic can be
moved to `-[FlutterViewController awakeFromNib]` in a
FlutterViewController subclass.
An example can be seen here:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/169276/files#diff-dbe39c23a0a380447b90b7559a878dae8564616e0875c4ef0d9e99e02b91adac
## Changes since revert
I changed the init in `//dev/integration_tests/external_textures` from
the UIApplicationDelegate to the FlutterViewController's awakeFromNib.
This is a more appropriate place for initialization post-UISceneDelegate
since it avoids the launch engine altogether. I tried avoiding to make
the big change to prove we could do a small change to migrate that
project. I don't think this big refactor is indicative of what users
will experience. There was a timing assumption in the integration test
that required not using the launch engine at all.
## Description
fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/167267
design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZfcQOs-UKRa9jsFG84-MTFeibZTLKCvPQLxF2eskx44/edit?tab=t.0
relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168396
relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168914
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
This is solely a change to allow the CL for
https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/59069 to land.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [ ] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
This feature landed opt-in in 3.29 and opt-out in 3.32:
https://docs.flutter.dev/release/breaking-changes/flutter-generate-i10n-source
In this PR, we remove the ability to use `flutter config
--no-enable-explicit-package-dependencies`, and remove all places that
opt-in to the flag (which are currently NOPs). Follow-up PRs will
refactor tests relying on the older behavior, and then finally remove
`package:flutter_gen` and the `.flutter-plugins` (legacy format) file
guarded by this flag.
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#168914
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: gaaclarke
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting:
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Mac_ios%20external_ui_integration_test_ios/16792/overview
The external texture integration test is failing. Running the host app
appeared to work but one of the driver asserts isn't working.
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: gaaclarke
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {vashworth}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
## **BREAKING CHANGE**
Adopting Apple's UISceneDelegate protocol shifts the initialization
order of apps. For the common cases we've made sure they will work
without change. The one case that will require a change is any app that
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]` assumes that
`UIApplicationDelegate.window.rootViewController` is a
`FlutterViewController` instance. This is sometimes done to register
platform channels directly on the `FlutterViewController`. Instead users
should use the `FlutterPluginRegistry` API's to create platform channels
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]`, like
`FlutterPlugin`s do.
An example can be seen here:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168914/files#diff-9f59c5248b58124beca7e290a57646023cda3ca024607092c6c6932606ce16ee
## Changes since revert
Device lab tests have been migrated to using the FlutterPlugin API for
creating platform channels at process launch.
## Description
fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/167267
design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZfcQOs-UKRa9jsFG84-MTFeibZTLKCvPQLxF2eskx44/edit?tab=t.0
relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168396
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
## **BREAKING CHANGE**
Adopting Apple's UISceneDelegate protocol shifts the initialization
order of apps. For the common cases we've made sure they will work
without change. The one case that will require a change is any app that
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]` assumes that
`UIApplicationDelegate.window.rootViewController` is a
`FlutterViewController` instance. This is sometimes done to register
platform channels directly on the `FlutterViewController`. Instead users
should use the `FlutterPluginRegistry` API's to create platform channels
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]`, like
`FlutterPlugin`s do.
An example can be seen here:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168914/files#diff-9f59c5248b58124beca7e290a57646023cda3ca024607092c6c6932606ce16ee
## Changes since revert
Device lab tests have been migrated to using the FlutterPlugin API for
creating platform channels at process launch.
## Description
fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/167267
design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZfcQOs-UKRa9jsFG84-MTFeibZTLKCvPQLxF2eskx44/edit?tab=t.0
relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168396
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
This PR is to make `BottomAppBarTheme` conform to Flutter Material's
conventions for component themes:
- Added a `BottomAppBarThemeData` class which defines overrides for the
defaults for `BottomAppBar` properties.
- Added `BottomAppBarTheme` constructor parameters:
`BottomAppBarThemeData? data` and `Widget? child`. This is now the
preferred way to configure a `BottomAppBarTheme`:
```dart
BottomAppBarTheme(
data: BottomAppBarThemeData(
color: xxx,
height: xxx,
elevation: xxx,
shape: xxx,
...
),
child: const BottomAppBar()
)
```
These two properties are made nullable to not break existing apps which
has customized `ThemeData.bottomAppBarTheme`.
- Update `BottomAppBarTheme` to be an `InheritedWidget` subclass.
- Changed the type of component theme defaults from `BottomAppBarTheme`
to `BottomAppBarThemeData`.
- Changed the `BottomAppBarTheme bottomAppBarTheme` property to
`BottomAppBarThemeData bottomAppBarTheme` in `ThemeData` and
`ThemeData.copyWith()`. This may cause breaking changes, a migration
guide will be created on website repo.
- Add new tests for `BottomAppBarThemeData` and update the existing
`BottomAppBarTheme` tests. And also turn to `true` for `useMaterial3`
(along with usages accordingly) at the common method `_withTheme()`
since `useMaterial3` is true by default.
- Addresses the "theme normalization" sub-project within #91772.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
---------
Signed-off-by: huycozy <huy@nevercode.io>
My newly added DDC macrobenchmarks tests have been timing out on the
test infra. It turns out that `headless` Chrome is significantly slower
than headful Chrome (reasons unknown, but perhaps related to hardware
acceleration). Using `--headless=new` instead of `flutter run`'s
headless flag (which uses the old headless mode) makes my local runs
significantly (10x+) faster.
*This time for sure*
No issue, found while debugging goldens.
The file path referenced does not exist. I think the replacement file is
the correct one because it referenced the image that appear related.
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aflutter%2Fflutter%20dev%2Ftools%2Fandroid_engine_test%2FREADME.md&type=code
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Roll packages to the ones published today.
Note that `native_assets_cli` was split up into `hooks` and
`code_assets`, and `native_assets_builder` was renamed to
`hooks_runner`.
Bypasses this error in the test infra `[2025-04-30 20:32:46.191597]
[STDOUT] [CHROME STDERR]:
[CHROME]:[3497:3497:0430/203246.172288:ERROR:ozone_platform_x11.cc(244)]
Missing X server or $DISPLAY`.
Resolves this error on the bots (I hope!):
```
[2025-04-29 15:56:48.817223] [STDOUT] [CHROME STDERR]: [CHROME]:[41258:41258:0429/155648.790553:FATAL:zygote_host_impl_linux.cc(126)] No usable sandbox! Update your kernel or see https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/linux/suid_sandbox_development.md for more information on developing with the SUID sandbox. If you want to live dangerously and need an immediate workaround, you can try using --no-sandbox.
```
Notable changes:
* Allows macrobenchmarks to run via `flutter run`.
* Splits macrobenchmarking between "orchestration logic" and "app
serving" (served on separate ports on the same machine to keep the
scheme consistent with the `flutter build` path).
* Adds an intercepted entrypoint for web benchmarks. We can't pass flags
to the app since it's not supported, so I've hard-coded the
orchestration server's port.
* Adding logic to connect to an existing Chrome debugger instance (vs
spawning one) for benchmarks.
The keyboard hot restart test listens to `flutter run` logs and then
does an action. However, the test prints the `flutter run` log after the
action. This results in confusing logs.
For example:
https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8716606099574306145/+/u/run_keyboard_hot_restart_ios/stdout
```
═══════════╡ ••• Launch app and wait for keyboard to be visible ••• ╞═══════════
...
stdout: Installing and launching... 37.2s
stdout: Syncing files to device swarming’s iPhone...
════╡ ••• Update the app to no longer force the keyboard to be visible ••• ╞════
════════════════════════╡ ••• Hot restart the app ••• ╞═════════════════════════
════════════╡ ••• Wait until the keyboard is no longer visible ••• ╞════════════
stdout: flutter: Keyboard is open
```
Here, the test waits until the keyboard is visible before moving onto
the test's next step. However, the log that triggers this action
(`flutter: Keyboard is open`) is printed after the action was taken
(`Update the app to no longer force the keyboard to be visible` and
`Wait until the keyboard is no longer visible`). This is confusing.
Follow-up to: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/167013
Part of: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/10713
This PR is to wire up `MenuAnchor` related widgets to SemanticsRole.
* When use `MenuAnchor` and a menu is opened, the menu has
`SemanticsRole.menu`.
* `MenuBar` has `SemanticsRole.menuBar`
* `MenuItemButton` has `SemanticsRole.menuItem`
* `SubmenuButton` has `SemanticsRole.menuItem` with `aria-haspopup`
attribute setup.
* `CheckboxMenuButton` has `SemanticsRole.menuItemCheckbox`
* `RadioMenuButton` has `SemanticsRole.menuItemRadio`
This PR also includes some changes related to `OverlayPortal` and
`RawMenuAnchor` so the "button" and the "menu" that the button opens has
a "parent-children" relationship. Previously, they are siblings
relationship which will cause some navigation issue in a11y.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
