<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#179647
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: gmackall
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Mac_mokey run_release_test failing
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: gmackall
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {reidbaker, jtmcdole}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
Changes our cipd hosted android sdk+ndk bundle to no longer modify
directory structure from what Android directly provides, allowing AGP to
find the ndk automatically and preventing downloading.
1. Changes the `create_cipd_packages.sh` script so we don't move the ndk
2. Uses the new script to upload a
[36v4unmodified](https://chrome-infra-packages.appspot.com/p/flutter/android/sdk/all/linux-amd64/+/version:36v4unmodified)
bundle
3. Changes DEPS+ci.yaml to reference the new bundle
4. Changes GN build rules accordingly
5. Removes special config in existing build.gradle files to point at the
location of the ndk - agp should now know where it is without conig
6. For some tests, passes in an environment variable pointing to the ndk
location, to override the environment variable passed by the recipes.
This variable is respected by the tool, so the recipes passing it,
pointing to the wrong place, is problematic. After this change lands we
can stop passing it in the recipes, and then we can remove this special
config in the tests. But adding it temporarily allows us to make this
change without coordinating a recipes change at the same moment, and
probably breaking things out of band.
Logs from a random postsubmit run of `Mac
build_android_host_app_with_module_aar` on the tree currently:
https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8695664517253382913/+/u/run_build_android_host_app_with_module_aar/stdout
We see
> [2025-12-12 10:49:49.223087] [STDOUT] stdout: Checking the license for
package NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 in
/Volumes/Work/s/w/ir/cache/android/sdk/licenses
[2025-12-12 10:49:49.223221] [STDOUT] stdout: License for package NDK
(Side by side) 28.2.13676358 accepted.
[2025-12-12 10:49:49.223268] [STDOUT] stdout: Preparing "Install NDK
(Side by side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358".
[2025-12-12 10:50:14.093824] [STDOUT] stdout: "Install NDK (Side by
side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358" ready.
[2025-12-12 10:50:14.093909] [STDOUT] stdout: Installing NDK (Side by
side) 28.2.13676358 in
/Volumes/Work/s/w/ir/cache/android/sdk/ndk/28.2.13676358
[2025-12-12 10:50:14.093947] [STDOUT] stdout: "Install NDK (Side by
side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358" complete.
[2025-12-12 10:50:14.410724] [STDOUT] stdout: "Install NDK (Side by
side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358" finished.
Example of no longer downloading:
Logs from a presubmit run:
https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8695732180931529361/+/u/run_build_android_host_app_with_module_aar/stdout
We don't see these logs. We still see android build tools downloading -
we can probably tackle that in another pr.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [ ] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [ ] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [ ] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [ ] I signed the [CLA].
- [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [ ] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
**Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code
Assist for
GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code).
Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as
authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments
useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or
disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team
member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be
addressed.
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
Changes our cipd hosted android sdk+ndk bundle to no longer modify
directory structure from what Android directly provides, allowing AGP to
find the ndk automatically and preventing downloading.
1. Changes the `create_cipd_packages.sh` script so we don't move the ndk
2. Uses the new script to upload a
[36v4unmodified](https://chrome-infra-packages.appspot.com/p/flutter/android/sdk/all/linux-amd64/+/version:36v4unmodified)
bundle
3. Changes DEPS+ci.yaml to reference the new bundle
4. Changes GN build rules accordingly
5. Removes special config in existing build.gradle files to point at the
location of the ndk - agp should now know where it is without conig
6. For some tests, passes in an environment variable pointing to the ndk
location, to override the environment variable passed by the recipes.
This variable is respected by the tool, so the recipes passing it,
pointing to the wrong place, is problematic. After this change lands we
can stop passing it in the recipes, and then we can remove this special
config in the tests. But adding it temporarily allows us to make this
change without coordinating a recipes change at the same moment, and
probably breaking things out of band.
Logs from a random postsubmit run of `Mac
build_android_host_app_with_module_aar` on the tree currently:
https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8695664517253382913/+/u/run_build_android_host_app_with_module_aar/stdout
We see
> [2025-12-12 10:49:49.223087] [STDOUT] stdout: Checking the license for
package NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 in
/Volumes/Work/s/w/ir/cache/android/sdk/licenses
[2025-12-12 10:49:49.223221] [STDOUT] stdout: License for package NDK
(Side by side) 28.2.13676358 accepted.
[2025-12-12 10:49:49.223268] [STDOUT] stdout: Preparing "Install NDK
(Side by side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358".
[2025-12-12 10:50:14.093824] [STDOUT] stdout: "Install NDK (Side by
side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358" ready.
[2025-12-12 10:50:14.093909] [STDOUT] stdout: Installing NDK (Side by
side) 28.2.13676358 in
/Volumes/Work/s/w/ir/cache/android/sdk/ndk/28.2.13676358
[2025-12-12 10:50:14.093947] [STDOUT] stdout: "Install NDK (Side by
side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358" complete.
[2025-12-12 10:50:14.410724] [STDOUT] stdout: "Install NDK (Side by
side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358" finished.
Example of no longer downloading:
Logs from a presubmit run:
https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8695732180931529361/+/u/run_build_android_host_app_with_module_aar/stdout
We don't see these logs. We still see android build tools downloading -
we can probably tackle that in another pr.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [ ] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [ ] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [ ] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [ ] I signed the [CLA].
- [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [ ] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
**Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code
Assist for
GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code).
Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as
authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments
useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or
disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team
member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be
addressed.
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
---------
Co-authored-by: DoLT <dolt@guide.inc>
Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com>
Co-authored-by: John "codefu" McDole <john@mcdole.org>
Generate new gradle lockfiles and delete ignore locking files.
```bash
dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-gradle-generation --no-exclusion --stop-ignoring
```
Fixes: [#177071](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/177071)
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
This PR is the first of 2 that will update the Android Embedder to use
the new dependency for AndroidX Exifinterface. This PR generates the
necessary ignore lockfiles files. These files will be deleted in a
follow-up PR that also regenerates the gradle lockfiles from the
universal engine artifacts.
Addresses [#177071](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/177071)
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
Create a workaround for generating gradle lock files. When the ignore
files exist, gradle locking will be disabled. This will allow deps for
the embedder to be checked in, and then in a follow-up PR the lockfiles
can correctly be updated and the ignore files can be deleted.
Note: This does NOT include the addition of the new exifinterface dep
for the Android embedder.
Fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/177066
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#178417
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jtmcdole
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: tree broke
<img width="1892" height="116" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8dc73727-322e-4fe3-b9b8-968048989f88"
/>
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: mboetger
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {gmackall}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
This is a follow-up PR to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/177508
This generates the new Gradle lockfiles from the new engine artifacts
and deletes the .ignore-locking.md file.
Generated by running:
```bash
dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-gradle-generation --no-exclusion
```
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
This is a follow-up PR to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/177508
This generates the new Gradle lockfiles from the new engine artifacts
and deletes the .ignore-locking.md file.
Generated by running:
```bash
dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-gradle-generation --no-exclusion
```
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#177508
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jtmcdole
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: tree is no bueno
```
┌─ Flutter Fix ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ [2025-11-12 16:47:24.646119] [STDOUT] stdout: │ You need to update the lockfile, or disable Gradle dependency locking. │ [2025-11-12 16:47:24.646119] [STDOUT] stdout: │ To regenerate the lockfiles run: `.\gradlew.bat :generateLockfiles` in │ [2025-11-12 16:47:24.646119] [STDOUT] stdout: │ c:\
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: mboetger
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {reidbaker, gmackall}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
Create a workaround for generating gradle lock files. When the ignore file exists, gradle locking will be disabled. This will allow deps for the embedder to be checked in, and then in a follow-up PR the lockfiles can correctly be updated and the ignore file can be deleted.
Fixes: #177066, #177071
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
Create a workaround for generating gradle lock files. When the ignore
file exists, gradle locking will be disabled. This will allow deps for
the embedder to be checked in, and then in a follow-up PR the lockfiles
can correctly be updated and the ignore file can be deleted.
Fixes: #177066, #177071
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
---------
Co-authored-by: Reid Baker <1063596+reidbaker@users.noreply.github.com>
Justification this is safe:
useAndroidX which I left in this pr was added in 2018 and is one of 2
flags that control what compile behavior is used as android migrated
from the support library to androidx.
We (flutter android) believe we have migrated all support library usages
to android x.
Android Studio does not automatically insert the Jetifier flag in newly
created projects, suggesting a move towards less reliance on it.
I think even if plugins were using the support libraries this pr would
not break them because the targets being modified are tests in this repo
and the engine build which only uses androidx dependencies.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
- **Relands "Bump warn and error versions of agp, kotlin and gradle
versions in preparation for gradle 9 (#171399)"**
- **bump lockfile generator to use kotlin 2.1.0**
- **Update formatting of lockfile to pass ktlint**
Updated lockfiles with
`JAVA_HOME=/opt/homebrew/opt/openjdk@17/libexec/openjdk.jdk/Contents/Home/
dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart` after
dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart to bump the versions of
kotlin.
Failing tests from first attempt
https://flutter-dashboard.appspot.com/#/build?hashFilter=84a5ce765d193a9c79ab4297f367d5ad7efc5dac&showMac=false&showWindows=false&showiOS=false&showLinux=false&showBringup=true&repo=flutter&branch=master
Verified example test that cause revert was passing by running the
following
- `../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t
run_debug_test_android.dart` from `dev/devicelab`
- `../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t
run_release_test` from `dev/devicelab`
- `SHARD=android_engine_vulkan_tests bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart
dev/bots/test.dart` from root with an android emulator. Hard to actually
verify because the emulator is closed as part of the tests but no
failures were from failures to compile.
- `flutter test
test/general.shard/android/android_project_migration_test.dart` from
`packages/flutter_tools/`
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#169451
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: matanlurey
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Broke a number of post-submit tests
(ios_app_extension, packages_autoroller).
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: mosuem
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {matanlurey}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
Reland after #169357.
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
Reland after #169357.
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
After this PR is merged, all of `integration_test` Android gradle
buildscripts will be in Kotlin.
Follow-up of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/156291
Part of ongoing effort to use Gradle Kotlin DSL a bit more
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Fixes#162107
Commands that were helpful when working on this pr.
`dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart
--no-gradle-generation` from flutter/flutter root.
`./gradlew test` from packages/flutter_tools/gradle.
`git add -- ":*.lockfile"` for adding only lockfile changes.
`../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t
android_java11_dependency_smoke_tests` from dev/devicelab
`ktlint --editorconfig=dev/bots/test/analyze-test-input/.editorconfig
--baseline=dev/bots/test/analyze-test-input/ktlint-baseline.xml
packages/flutter_tools/gradle/src/ --format` formatting kotlin code.
Need ktlint 1.5
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/160257.
~~This will sit on CI for a bit and give me a better idea of how much
work there is to do.~~ Done!
## IMPORTANT: Do **not** revert on 1-2 isolated post-submit failures.
While I've spent the last several weeks getting this passing all
presubmit tests, and some integration tests I suspected might be
affected, it is possible that there are 1-2 integration tests that will
fail as a result of landing this PR. I'll disable the flag
(`--no-explicit-package-dependencies`) if the failures look obvious
enough, otherwise I'll revert.
