mirror of
https://github.com/flutter/flutter.git
synced 2026-02-20 02:29:02 +08:00
845 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Elijah Okoroh
|
6e4a481bdf
|
Fix iOS CI tests for Xcode 26 Swift compatibility (#182132)
Fixes Swift_force_load - check #175905 for more info *If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].* ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md --------- Co-authored-by: Victoria Ashworth <15619084+vashworth@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Loïc Sharma
|
4998122194
|
Bump Dart to 3.10 (#174066)
This version of Dart supports dot shorthands. Follow-up to: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/180607 See also: * https://flutter.dev/go/flutter-style-updates * https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/181934 |
||
|
Navaron Bracke
|
3e6c207166
|
Deprecate onReorder callback (#178242)
This pull request deprecates the old `onReorder` callback of `ReorderableList` / `SliverReorderableList` / `ReorderableListView`, in favor of a new callback, `onReorderItem`, that does the index correction as mentioned in the docs at https://api.flutter.dev/flutter/widgets/ReorderCallback.html I added tests to ensure that the old callback is preferred when both are provided and tests that assert that the new callback does the index correction correctly. I also noticed that some tests used empty callbacks for `onReorder`, those have been updated to use wildcards in a consistent manner. I did not opt into making a design doc, since the change itself is very small, that will also be apparent in the migration guide that I am going to write. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/127901 Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/169878 *If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].* TODO: add a migration guide on the website ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md --------- Co-authored-by: Tong Mu <dkwingsmt@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Victor Sanni <victorsanniay@gmail.com> |
||
|
David Bebawy
|
99e01e108a
|
fix(windows): use wcsnlen for defensive programming (CWE-126) (#180419)
## Description This PR replaces `wcslen` with `wcsnlen` in the Windows runner template and all example/dev/integration test files to address CWE-126 (Buffer Over-read) flagged by static analysis tools (Semgrep/GitLab SAST). ## Changes The `Utf8FromUtf16` function now uses `wcsnlen` with the `UNICODE_STRING_MAX_CHARS` constant (32767) as the maximum length, providing defensive programming against potential buffer over-reads. **Key improvements:** 1. Calculate `input_length` **first** using `wcsnlen(utf16_string, UNICODE_STRING_MAX_CHARS)` 2. Use that bounded length for **both** `WideCharToMultiByte` calls (eliminates the `-1` unbounded read) 3. Remove the `-1` adjustment since explicit length excludes null terminator 4. Use `static_cast` instead of C-style casts per Google C++ Style Guide ## Test Coverage Added comprehensive edge case tests for `Utf8FromUtf16` in `windows_startup_test`: - **nullptr input**: Verifies function returns empty string - **Empty string input**: Verifies function returns empty string - **Invalid UTF-16 (unpaired surrogate)**: Verifies function handles malformed input gracefully These tests address reviewer feedback from @loic-sharma requesting coverage for corner cases. ## Files Updated **Template (source of truth):** - `packages/flutter_tools/templates/app/windows.tmpl/runner/utils.cpp` **Integration tests (4 files):** - `dev/integration_tests/flutter_gallery/windows/runner/utils.cpp` - `dev/integration_tests/ui/windows/runner/utils.cpp` - `dev/integration_tests/windowing_test/windows/runner/utils.cpp` - `dev/integration_tests/windows_startup_test/windows/runner/utils.cpp` **Examples and dev apps (10 files):** - `examples/hello_world/windows/runner/utils.cpp` - `examples/layers/windows/runner/utils.cpp` - `examples/platform_view/windows/runner/utils.cpp` - `examples/flutter_view/windows/runner/utils.cpp` - `examples/platform_channel/windows/runner/utils.cpp` - `examples/api/windows/runner/utils.cpp` - `examples/multiple_windows/windows/runner/utils.cpp` - `dev/manual_tests/windows/runner/utils.cpp` - `dev/benchmarks/complex_layout/windows/runner/utils.cpp` - `dev/a11y_assessments/windows/runner/utils.cpp` **Test files (4 files):** - `dev/integration_tests/windows_startup_test/windows/runner/flutter_window.cpp` - `dev/integration_tests/windows_startup_test/lib/main.dart` - `dev/integration_tests/windows_startup_test/lib/windows.dart` - `dev/integration_tests/windows_startup_test/test_driver/main_test.dart` ## Rationale While the Windows API guarantees null-termination for strings returned by `CommandLineToArgvW`, using `wcsnlen` with an explicit bound is a defensive programming best practice that: - Satisfies static analysis tools - Provides an extra safety layer - Follows the principle of defense in depth The limit of 32767 (`UNICODE_STRING_MAX_CHARS`) is the maximum length of a `UNICODE_STRING` structure and is far beyond any realistic command-line argument length. ## Related Issues Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/180418 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and labeled this PR with `severe: API break` if it contains a breaking change. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#breaking-changes |
||
|
Gray Mackall
|
91cc68f695
|
[Reland] Unmodified android sdk bundle (#179920)
Relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/179647 There were only two failing tests (there were also two bringup failures, the `mac_arm64_mokey` versions of these) https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Mac_mokey%20run_release_test/3866/overview https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Mac_mokey%20run_debug_test_android/5454/overview They failed with the same logs ``` Task result: { "success": false, "reason": "Task failed: flutter run had unexpected output on standard error." } ``` The stderr in question: ``` [2025-12-15 14:06:56.311794] [STDOUT] run:stderr: - integration_test requires Android NDK 28.2.13676358 [2025-12-15 14:06:56.311989] [STDOUT] run:stderr: Fix this issue by using the highest Android NDK version (they are backward compatible). [2025-12-15 14:06:56.312019] [STDOUT] run:stderr: Add the following to /opt/s/w/ir/x/w/rc/tmpr6kj09d_/flutter sdk/dev/integration_tests/ui/android/app/build.gradle: [2025-12-15 14:06:56.312074] [STDOUT] run:stderr: [2025-12-15 14:06:56.312092] [STDOUT] run:stderr: android { [2025-12-15 14:06:56.312144] [STDOUT] run:stderr: ndkVersion = "28.2.13676358" [2025-12-15 14:06:56.312162] [STDOUT] run:stderr: ... [2025-12-15 14:06:56.312205] [STDOUT] run:stderr: } ``` We can just set the ndk version to `flutter.ndkVersion`, which is this value. It's also what is set in the templates, so it isn't a hack that doesn't represent a real flutter app. Verified the tests pass now with ``` ../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t run_release_test ../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t run_debug_test_android ``` ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md --------- Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com> |
||
|
auto-submit[bot]
|
8edbbb7391
|
Reverts "Unmodified android sdk bundle (#179647)" (#179904)
<!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#179647 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: gmackall <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: Mac_mokey run_release_test failing <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: gmackall <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {reidbaker, jtmcdole} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: Changes our cipd hosted android sdk+ndk bundle to no longer modify directory structure from what Android directly provides, allowing AGP to find the ndk automatically and preventing downloading. 1. Changes the `create_cipd_packages.sh` script so we don't move the ndk 2. Uses the new script to upload a [36v4unmodified](https://chrome-infra-packages.appspot.com/p/flutter/android/sdk/all/linux-amd64/+/version:36v4unmodified) bundle 3. Changes DEPS+ci.yaml to reference the new bundle 4. Changes GN build rules accordingly 5. Removes special config in existing build.gradle files to point at the location of the ndk - agp should now know where it is without conig 6. For some tests, passes in an environment variable pointing to the ndk location, to override the environment variable passed by the recipes. This variable is respected by the tool, so the recipes passing it, pointing to the wrong place, is problematic. After this change lands we can stop passing it in the recipes, and then we can remove this special config in the tests. But adding it temporarily allows us to make this change without coordinating a recipes change at the same moment, and probably breaking things out of band. Logs from a random postsubmit run of `Mac build_android_host_app_with_module_aar` on the tree currently: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8695664517253382913/+/u/run_build_android_host_app_with_module_aar/stdout We see > [2025-12-12 10:49:49.223087] [STDOUT] stdout: Checking the license for package NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 in /Volumes/Work/s/w/ir/cache/android/sdk/licenses [2025-12-12 10:49:49.223221] [STDOUT] stdout: License for package NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 accepted. [2025-12-12 10:49:49.223268] [STDOUT] stdout: Preparing "Install NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358". [2025-12-12 10:50:14.093824] [STDOUT] stdout: "Install NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358" ready. [2025-12-12 10:50:14.093909] [STDOUT] stdout: Installing NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 in /Volumes/Work/s/w/ir/cache/android/sdk/ndk/28.2.13676358 [2025-12-12 10:50:14.093947] [STDOUT] stdout: "Install NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358" complete. [2025-12-12 10:50:14.410724] [STDOUT] stdout: "Install NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358" finished. Example of no longer downloading: Logs from a presubmit run: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8695732180931529361/+/u/run_build_android_host_app_with_module_aar/stdout We don't see these logs. We still see android build tools downloading - we can probably tackle that in another pr. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [ ] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [ ] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [ ] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [ ] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [ ] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com> |
||
|
Gray Mackall
|
c0b808c9ed
|
Unmodified android sdk bundle (#179647)
Changes our cipd hosted android sdk+ndk bundle to no longer modify directory structure from what Android directly provides, allowing AGP to find the ndk automatically and preventing downloading. 1. Changes the `create_cipd_packages.sh` script so we don't move the ndk 2. Uses the new script to upload a [36v4unmodified](https://chrome-infra-packages.appspot.com/p/flutter/android/sdk/all/linux-amd64/+/version:36v4unmodified) bundle 3. Changes DEPS+ci.yaml to reference the new bundle 4. Changes GN build rules accordingly 5. Removes special config in existing build.gradle files to point at the location of the ndk - agp should now know where it is without conig 6. For some tests, passes in an environment variable pointing to the ndk location, to override the environment variable passed by the recipes. This variable is respected by the tool, so the recipes passing it, pointing to the wrong place, is problematic. After this change lands we can stop passing it in the recipes, and then we can remove this special config in the tests. But adding it temporarily allows us to make this change without coordinating a recipes change at the same moment, and probably breaking things out of band. Logs from a random postsubmit run of `Mac build_android_host_app_with_module_aar` on the tree currently: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8695664517253382913/+/u/run_build_android_host_app_with_module_aar/stdout We see > [2025-12-12 10:49:49.223087] [STDOUT] stdout: Checking the license for package NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 in /Volumes/Work/s/w/ir/cache/android/sdk/licenses [2025-12-12 10:49:49.223221] [STDOUT] stdout: License for package NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 accepted. [2025-12-12 10:49:49.223268] [STDOUT] stdout: Preparing "Install NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358". [2025-12-12 10:50:14.093824] [STDOUT] stdout: "Install NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358" ready. [2025-12-12 10:50:14.093909] [STDOUT] stdout: Installing NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 in /Volumes/Work/s/w/ir/cache/android/sdk/ndk/28.2.13676358 [2025-12-12 10:50:14.093947] [STDOUT] stdout: "Install NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358" complete. [2025-12-12 10:50:14.410724] [STDOUT] stdout: "Install NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358" finished. Example of no longer downloading: Logs from a presubmit run: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8695732180931529361/+/u/run_build_android_host_app_with_module_aar/stdout We don't see these logs. We still see android build tools downloading - we can probably tackle that in another pr. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [ ] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [ ] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [ ] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [ ] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [ ] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md --------- Co-authored-by: DoLT <dolt@guide.inc> Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com> Co-authored-by: John "codefu" McDole <john@mcdole.org> |
||
|
Kate Lovett
|
9d96df2364
|
Modernize framework lints (#179089)
WIP Commits separated as follows: - Update lints in analysis_options files - Run `dart fix --apply` - Clean up leftover analysis issues - Run `dart format .` in the right places. Local analysis and testing passes. Checking CI now. Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/178827 - Adoption of flutter_lints in examples/api coming in a separate change (cc @loic-sharma) ## Pre-launch Checklist - [ ] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [ ] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [ ] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [ ] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [ ] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Kate Lovett
|
460d55e659
|
Bump Dart to 3.9 (#179041)
Prep for https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/178827 This bumps Dart to 3.9. We are holding off on 3.10 until we can include best practices for dot shorthands in the style guide, which will follow the lint update in #178827 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Kate Lovett
|
8fcd610210
|
Roll pub manually, pick up flutter_lints in examples/api (#179030)
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/178827 Manual pub roll to add dev dependency on flutter_lints to examples/api ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Kate Lovett
|
b62b97fd06
|
Manual pub roll (#178687)
Fresh crack at https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/178558 after changes in flutter/tests and flutter/packages Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/178270 Replaces https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/178312 Following up on why the script is not generating lock files in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/178409 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Matt Boetger
|
ef1733bb6e
|
[Reland] Generate new Gradle lockfiles and delete ignore files (#178553)
Generate new gradle lockfiles and delete ignore locking files. ```bash dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-gradle-generation --no-exclusion --stop-ignoring ``` Fixes: [#177071](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/177071) ## Pre-launch Checklist - [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [X] I signed the [CLA]. - [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [X] All existing and new tests are passing. |
||
|
Matt Boetger
|
6815bca01e
|
[Reland] Generate ignore lockfiles and Update Android Embedder Dependencies (#178538)
This PR is the first of 2 that will update the Android Embedder to use the new dependency for AndroidX Exifinterface. This PR generates the necessary ignore lockfiles files. These files will be deleted in a follow-up PR that also regenerates the gradle lockfiles from the universal engine artifacts. Addresses [#177071](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/177071) ## Pre-launch Checklist - [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [X] I signed the [CLA]. - [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [X] All existing and new tests are passing. |
||
|
Matt Boetger
|
91176cc349
|
[Reland] Gradle Lockfile workaround (#178485)
Create a workaround for generating gradle lock files. When the ignore files exist, gradle locking will be disabled. This will allow deps for the embedder to be checked in, and then in a follow-up PR the lockfiles can correctly be updated and the ignore files can be deleted. Note: This does NOT include the addition of the new exifinterface dep for the Android embedder. Fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/177066 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [X] I signed the [CLA]. - [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [X] All existing and new tests are passing. |
||
|
auto-submit[bot]
|
862e4a75b1
|
Reverts "Update gradle lockfiles for new exifinterface dep (#178417)" (#178456)
<!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#178417 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: jtmcdole <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: tree broke <img width="1892" height="116" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8dc73727-322e-4fe3-b9b8-968048989f88" /> <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: mboetger <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {gmackall} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: This is a follow-up PR to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/177508 This generates the new Gradle lockfiles from the new engine artifacts and deletes the .ignore-locking.md file. Generated by running: ```bash dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-gradle-generation --no-exclusion ``` ## Pre-launch Checklist - [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [X] I signed the [CLA]. - [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [X] All existing and new tests are passing. <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com> |
||
|
Matt Boetger
|
29f2ae4c26
|
Update gradle lockfiles for new exifinterface dep (#178417)
This is a follow-up PR to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/177508 This generates the new Gradle lockfiles from the new engine artifacts and deletes the .ignore-locking.md file. Generated by running: ```bash dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-gradle-generation --no-exclusion ``` ## Pre-launch Checklist - [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [X] I signed the [CLA]. - [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [X] All existing and new tests are passing. |
||
|
auto-submit[bot]
|
d48aa42950
|
Reverts "Gradle Lockfile workaround and Android Embedder dependency change for ExifInterface (#177508)" (#178428)
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#177508
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jtmcdole
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: tree is no bueno
```
┌─ Flutter Fix ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ [2025-11-12 16:47:24.646119] [STDOUT] stdout: │ You need to update the lockfile, or disable Gradle dependency locking. │ [2025-11-12 16:47:24.646119] [STDOUT] stdout: │ To regenerate the lockfiles run: `.\gradlew.bat :generateLockfiles` in │ [2025-11-12 16:47:24.646119] [STDOUT] stdout: │ c:\
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: mboetger
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {reidbaker, gmackall}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
Create a workaround for generating gradle lock files. When the ignore file exists, gradle locking will be disabled. This will allow deps for the embedder to be checked in, and then in a follow-up PR the lockfiles can correctly be updated and the ignore file can be deleted.
Fixes: #177066, #177071
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported.
- [X] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
|
||
|
Matt Boetger
|
564e4b4543
|
Gradle Lockfile workaround and Android Embedder dependency change for ExifInterface (#177508)
Create a workaround for generating gradle lock files. When the ignore file exists, gradle locking will be disabled. This will allow deps for the embedder to be checked in, and then in a follow-up PR the lockfiles can correctly be updated and the ignore file can be deleted. Fixes: #177066, #177071 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [X] I signed the [CLA]. - [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [X] All existing and new tests are passing. --------- Co-authored-by: Reid Baker <1063596+reidbaker@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
auto-submit[bot]
|
2c817be69e
|
Reverts "Roll pub packages (#178267)" (#178302)
<!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#178267 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: bkonyi <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: DWDS roll likely breaking Linux web_benchmarks_ddc_hot_reload, Linux web_benchmarks_ddc <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: flutter-pub-roller-bot <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {fluttergithubbot} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: This PR was generated by `flutter update-packages --force-upgrade` followed by `dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-exclusion --no-gradle-generation` <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com> |
||
|
flutter-pub-roller-bot
|
9c6fbe2d6b
|
Roll pub packages (#178267)
This PR was generated by `flutter update-packages --force-upgrade` followed by `dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-exclusion --no-gradle-generation` --------- Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com> |
||
|
Bruno Leroux
|
46b6f40982
|
Fix ElevatedButton.icon breaks focus traversal and VoiceOver when toggling icon (#177579)
## Description This PR changes `ElevatedButton.icon` to avoid building a different widget. When a different widget is created the whole subtree is recreated which leads to various issues (Focus and A11y issues for instance). The change is similar to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/175810 which fixed the exact same problem for `OutlinedButton.icon`. ## Related Issue [TextButton.icon breaks focus traversal and ink effect when toggling icon](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/173944) [Voiceover focus traversal breaks if a button's state changes to include an icon](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/175810) ## Tests - Adds 2 tests |
||
|
Bruno Leroux
|
c059c9b7da
|
Fix TextButton.icon breaks focus traversal and ink effect when toggling icon (#176579)
## Description This PR changes `TextButton.icon` to avoid building a different widget. When a different widget is created the whole subtree is recreated which leads to various issues (Focus and A11y issues for instance). The change is similar to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/175810 which fixed the exact same problem for `OutlinedButton.icon`. ## Related Issue Fixes [TextButton.icon breaks focus traversal and ink effect when toggling icon](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/173944) ## Tests - Adds 1 test --------- Co-authored-by: chunhtai <47866232+chunhtai@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
jesswrd
|
3c04c999c1
|
Bump Templates To Correct Versions (#177416)
I bumped templates to the correct versions. I also included a fix for kgp and agp compatability. AGP 8.11.0 -> 8.11.1 Gradle 8.13 -> 8.14 KGP 2.2.0 -> 2.2.20 I ran `flutter analyze --suggestions` and `flutter build apk` to ensure these are safe versions. Will cherry pick this to beta after the pr merges. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/177320 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Mouad Debbar
|
f94a942186
|
[web] Self-cleaning service worker (#176834)
Introduce a self-cleaning service worker to replace the old one. Previous attempts (https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/170918, https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/173609) had (accidentally?) disabled the loading of the service worker in `flutter.js`. This PR preserves the logic for loading the service worker, and it prints a deprecation warning. Towards https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/156910 Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/106225 |
||
|
jesswrd
|
a9866bc1f8
|
[Gradle 9] Resolve Gradle 9 Deprecations in flutter/flutter part 1 (#176865)
Resolving Gradle 9 deprecations in integration tests and tooling. Basically any Android project that is not in the engine. I had to bump AGP to 8.11.0 (and subsequently bump gradle and KGP) because lower versions include features that are deprecated in Gradle 9. Partially Addresses https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/173321 Partially Addresses https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/173318 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [ ] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
LouiseHsu
|
22a2203888
|
Fix Voiceover traversal for OutlinedButton.icon (#175810)
Fixes #172489 When an OutlinedButton.icon is initially built with a null icon and later updated to display an icon, the underlying widget implementation changes. The button switches from a standard OutlinedButton to a private _OutlinedButtonWithIcon widget. This switch causes the button's entire semantic node to be destroyed and a new one created in its place. For screen readers like VoiceOver, this behavior is disruptive. If an accessibility service is focused on the button when its icon appears, that focus is lost because the original semantic node is discarded, leading to strange behaviour as it makes an best effort to focus on an existing node. This PR resolves the issue by ensuring the same widget is used regardless of whether the icon is present. The logic for _OutlinedButtonWithIcon has been merged into the base class OutlinedButton, ensuring that no matter if you call OutlinedButton.icon or OutlinedButton you recieve a widget of type OutlinedButton. Demo: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e012bac9-823e-46f1-8eba-ec70e6b260a1 |
||
|
Gray Mackall
|
715b4d89d4
|
Roll pub packages and update lockfiles (#175446)
Manual takeover of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/175389. Still
need to figure out why the bot didn't run the script, seems like it
should have based on
|
||
|
Matan Lurey
|
a8ae5e07fd
|
Read bin/cache/flutter.version.json instead of version for flutter_gallery (#173797)
Towards https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/171900. |
||
|
Reid Baker
|
f6bbf76524
|
Remove jetifier usages (#173548)
- **Remove jetifiier usages across repo** Similar to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/173459 Related to #173430 Used `grep --exclude-dir=third_party --include=gradle\.properties -rw . -e "android.enableJetifier=true"` to find usages. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. |
||
|
Loïc Sharma
|
384331e171
|
Migrate to list and builder Sliver convenience constructors (#173011)
In 2022, we introduced new convenience constructors like `SliverList.builder` and `SliverList.list`. Unfortunately, LLMs like Gemini seem to prefer the delegate pattern even when these convenience constructors are usable. This updates Flutter's docs, code, and tests to use these convenience constructors where possible. Hopefully this will nudge LLMs to consider using the new APIs :) I migrated 80% of the code by hand, and 20% using Gemini CLI. See [go/loic-ai-log](http://goto.google.com/loic-ai-log) (Google internal) for details. There's a few locations that I wasn't able to migrate to the convenience constructors due to missing APIs. I filed the following issues: 1. https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/173018 2. https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/173019 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [ ] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Ricardo Dalarme
|
56d5389456
|
Migrate to null aware elements - Part 5 (#172418)
## Description Continuing the work from @jamilsaadeh97 to replace verbose null checks with modern [null_aware_elements](https://dart.dev/tools/linter-rules/use_null_aware_elements) syntax. This PR cleans up the remaining files not covered in the previous parts, making the code more concise. ## Related PRs - https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/172198 - https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/172306 - https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/172307 - https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/172322 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. |
||
|
René Kilczan
|
cfbaa18bde
|
Remove shortner (#172844)
Replacing shortner urls with the long versions. Fixes #172843 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Reid Baker
|
7762b4cf32
|
Bump warn and error versions of agp, kotlin and gradle versions in preparation for gradle 9 (#171776)
- **Relands "Bump warn and error versions of agp, kotlin and gradle versions in preparation for gradle 9 (#171399)"** - **bump lockfile generator to use kotlin 2.1.0** - **Update formatting of lockfile to pass ktlint** Updated lockfiles with `JAVA_HOME=/opt/homebrew/opt/openjdk@17/libexec/openjdk.jdk/Contents/Home/ dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart` after dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart to bump the versions of kotlin. Failing tests from first attempt https://flutter-dashboard.appspot.com/#/build?hashFilter=84a5ce765d193a9c79ab4297f367d5ad7efc5dac&showMac=false&showWindows=false&showiOS=false&showLinux=false&showBringup=true&repo=flutter&branch=master Verified example test that cause revert was passing by running the following - `../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t run_debug_test_android.dart` from `dev/devicelab` - `../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t run_release_test` from `dev/devicelab` - `SHARD=android_engine_vulkan_tests bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart dev/bots/test.dart` from root with an android emulator. Hard to actually verify because the emulator is closed as part of the tests but no failures were from failures to compile. - `flutter test test/general.shard/android/android_project_migration_test.dart` from `packages/flutter_tools/` ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. |
||
|
Kate Lovett
|
a04fb324be
|
Bump Dart to 3.8 and reformat (#171703)
Bumps the Dart version to 3.8 across the repo (excluding engine/src/flutter/third_party) and applies formatting updates from Dart 3.8. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Bruno Leroux
|
de3f804590
|
Normalize input decoration theme (#168981)
This PR is to make `InputDecorationTheme` conform to Flutter Material's conventions for component themes: - Added a `InputDecorationThemeData` class which defines overrides for the defaults for `InputDecorator` properties. - Added `InputDecorationTheme` constructor parameters: `InputDecorationThemeData? data` and `Widget? child`. This is now the preferred way to configure a `InputDecorationTheme`: ```dart InputDecorationTheme( data: InputDecorationThemeData( filled: true, fillColor: Colors.amber, ... ), child: const TextField() ) ``` These two properties are made nullable to not break existing apps which has customized `ThemeData.inputDecorationTheme`. - Update `InputDecorationTheme` to be an `InheritedTheme` subclass. - Changed the type of component theme defaults from `InputDecorationTheme` to `InputDecorationThemeData`. - Changed the `InputDecorationTheme bottomAppBarTheme` property to `Object? bottomAppBarTheme` in `ThemeData` and `ThemeData.copyWith()` (Object? is used for the moment to minimize Google tests failure. A follow-up PR will replace `Object?` with `InputDecorationThemeData`. - Addresses the "theme normalization" sub-project within #91772. A migration guide will be created on website repo. |
||
|
Moritz
|
70aa4b3e54
|
Workspace (#169556)
Reland after https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/169844. Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected packages. Assumptions: 1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`, `flutter_test`, and `flutter`. 2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter, flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other. Based on these assumptions, we use https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace. The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`, with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run `flutter upgrade`. There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and `packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely `packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger change, and out of the scope of this PR. This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a seamless transition. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
chunhtai
|
d0058ec361
|
Adds radio group widget r2 (#168161)
<!--
Thanks for filing a pull request!
Reviewers are typically assigned within a week of filing a request.
To learn more about code review, see our documentation on Tree Hygiene:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
-->
previous https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/167363
I have to factor out abstract class for RadioGroupRegistry and
RadioClient which are subclassed by RadioGroupState and RawRadio
respectively.
I have to do this because the RadioListTile that has 2 focusnode one for
listTile and one for the radio it builds. The issue is that RadioGroup's
keyboard shortcut has to tightly couples with the focus node of each
radio, but the radioListtile has to mute the radio's focusnode so it can
act as one control under keyboard shortcut
|
||
|
flutter-pub-roller-bot
|
ead0a01bb9
|
Roll pub packages (#169865)
This PR was generated by `flutter update-packages --force-upgrade`. |
||
|
Kevin Moore
|
c08e9dff68
|
Manually update vector_math package (#169476)
Includes fixes and deprecations that will allow us to improve performance. |
||
|
Tong Mu
|
df5f865a6b
|
[Cupertino] Apply RSuperellipse to most Cupertino widgets (#167784)
This PR applies RSuperellipse to most Cupertino widgets. I got the list by searching for `ClipRRect`, `drawRRect`, and `BoxDecoration` (with `borderRadius`) through the package. They're replaced by `ClipRSuperellipse`, `drawRSuperellipse`, and `ShapeDecoration` respectively. There are a few widgets that I didn't apply: * `CupertinoTextField` as well as its related widget `CupertinoSearchTextField`, because `CupertinoTextField` expects a `BoxDecoration` argument. Migrating it is nontrivial and will take place in a separate PR. * `CupertinoTextSelectionToolbar`, because it seems complicated (containing a lot of paths). I wonder if it's possible to replace the clipPath with clipRRect/clipRSe for better performance. * `CupertinoSwitch`. I suspect it's not an squircle since it tightly contains a full circle. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/13914. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [ ] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [ ] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [ ] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [ ] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [ ] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
auto-submit[bot]
|
4372bfbc6c
|
Reverts "Add workspace (#169451)" (#169468)
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#169451
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: matanlurey
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Broke a number of post-submit tests
(ios_app_extension, packages_autoroller).
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: mosuem
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {matanlurey}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
Reland after #169357.
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
|
||
|
Moritz
|
3a0897a336
|
Add workspace (#169451)
Reland after #169357. Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected packages. Assumptions: 1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`, `flutter_test`, and `flutter`. 2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter, flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other. Based on these assumptions, we use https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace. The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`, with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run `flutter upgrade`. There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and `packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely `packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger change, and out of the scope of this PR. This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a seamless transition. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
auto-submit[bot]
|
e0c42c6e38
|
Reverts "Use pub workspace (#168662)" (#169357)
<!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#168662 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: matanlurey <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: Broke integration tests that do not run on presubmit: - https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Mac_arm64%20macos_chrome_dev_mode/8715/overview - https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Linux_pixel_7pro%20linux_chrome_dev_mode/7617/overview <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: mosuem <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {matanlurey} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected packages. Assumptions: 1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`, `flutter_test`, and `flutter`. 2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter, flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other. Based on these assumptions, we use https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace. The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`, with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run `flutter upgrade`. There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and `packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely `packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger change, and out of the scope of this PR. This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a seamless transition. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com> |
||
|
Moritz
|
9a1dc1bd96
|
Use pub workspace (#168662)
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
|
||
|
Danny Tuppeny
|
c8d620e665
|
Unpin test/test_core/test_api packages (#169198)
These packages were recently pinned (in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168916) due to a bug (https://github.com/dart-lang/test/issues/2498). That bug was fixed and new versions of the test packages published. This change unpins and lets them upgrade to the fixed version. |
||
|
flutter-pub-roller-bot
|
cf1004028c
|
Roll pub packages (#169181)
This PR was generated by `flutter update-packages --force-upgrade`. |
||
|
ash2moon
|
0145fafb9a
|
add missing lockfiles not checked in from running generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart (#168600)
<!-- Thanks for filing a pull request! Reviewers are typically assigned within a week of filing a request. To learn more about code review, see our documentation on Tree Hygiene: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md --> These are generated files from using generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-gradle-generation They require no unit tests but a follow up PR will address adding a CI that tests if there are any lockfiles that need to be added. Partially addresses #163228 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
flutter-pub-roller-bot
|
35bd0b1393
|
Roll pub packages (#168509)
This PR was generated by `flutter update-packages --force-upgrade`. |
||
|
Victor Sanni
|
96d1b99211
|
Condense nav bar large title in landscape mode (#166956)
## Rotation demo https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b59d6875-dff7-4b40-9525-565dfd8a2554 ### Portrait mode .automatic https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/88f4f3a2-0f13-4c92-b601-20c20e13f7dc ### Landscape mode .automatic https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dd5e2373-82e3-41fc-8e83-4002ce5e848e ### Portrait mode .always https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/623d131a-f71b-430d-b84c-0b4519919f56 ### Landscape mode .always https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5980e8fe-a981-482d-9f77-97f9ab7495c7 Fixes [CupertinoSliverNavigationBar doesn't become compact in landscape mode](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/39254) <details> <summary>Sample code</summary> ```dart import 'package:flutter/cupertino.dart'; void main() => runApp(const NavBarBlueApp()); class NavBarBlueApp extends StatelessWidget { const NavBarBlueApp({super.key}); @override Widget build(BuildContext context) { return CupertinoApp( theme: CupertinoThemeData(), home: MainPage(), ); } } class MainPage extends StatelessWidget { const MainPage({super.key}); @override Widget build(BuildContext context) { return CupertinoPageScaffold( child: SafeArea( child: CustomScrollView( slivers: [ CupertinoSliverNavigationBar.search( stretch: true, searchField: CupertinoSearchTextField( suffixMode: OverlayVisibilityMode.always, suffixIcon: Icon( CupertinoIcons.mic_solid, )), largeTitle: Text('Lists'), bottomMode: NavigationBarBottomMode.always, ), SliverList( delegate: SliverChildBuilderDelegate( (BuildContext context, int index) { return CupertinoListTile( title: Text('Entry $index'), ); }, childCount: 20, ), ), ], ), ), ); } } ``` </details> |
||
|
flutter-pub-roller-bot
|
651ff0a8f2
|
Roll pub packages (#168119)
This PR was generated by `flutter update-packages --force-upgrade`. |