mirror of
https://github.com/flutter/flutter.git
synced 2026-01-09 07:51:35 +08:00
854 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ben Konyi
|
f075078a7d
|
[ Infra ] Ignore non-fatal Gradle daemon "termination" message (#180645)
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/177371 |
||
|
gaaclarke
|
5632701286
|
Moved high bitrate texture tests to engine (#179906)
This adds a few goldens where skia supports the file format. This is a bit more scalable and direct than managing integration tests. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Ben Konyi
|
49b416cf72
|
Unpin package:dwds dependency (#179462)
Refactoring of code in `package:dwds` `26.2.1` changed execution ordering enough for a race condition in the web benchmark harness to be hit. This change updates the web benchmark harness to not rely on waiting for console output from the spawned browser which can be missed. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/178326 --------- Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Elijah Okoroh
|
0b191ba123
|
Add shared Darwin implementation for plugins (#176495)
This PR introduces support for creating Flutter plugins with a single, shared implementation for iOS and macOS. This is enabled by a new darwin platform option in the flutter create command, which simplifies code maintenance and reduces duplication for plugin authors. *List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue. An issue is not required if the PR fixes something trivial like a typo.* Fixes #161019 *If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].* ## Pre-launch Checklist - [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [X] I signed the [CLA]. - [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [X] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Kate Lovett
|
9d96df2364
|
Modernize framework lints (#179089)
WIP Commits separated as follows: - Update lints in analysis_options files - Run `dart fix --apply` - Clean up leftover analysis issues - Run `dart format .` in the right places. Local analysis and testing passes. Checking CI now. Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/178827 - Adoption of flutter_lints in examples/api coming in a separate change (cc @loic-sharma) ## Pre-launch Checklist - [ ] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [ ] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [ ] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [ ] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [ ] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
b-luk
|
59945af629
|
Add macrobenchmark perf test for drawing arcs (#178690)
Adding a benchmark so the impact of #178269 can be measured.  ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
gaaclarke
|
33a30cb318
|
Impeller: Allows R32G32B32A32_SFLOAT images (#177959)
fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/141289 design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zpkMutZkqo2GVdMhiKzFURpgN8JDZTjtIVwwqqHKM90/edit?tab=t.0 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Gray Mackall
|
77cb77b947
|
Fix verified input integration test without breaking the rest of the devicelab tests (attempt 5) (#178093)
Reland of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/178018/ On top of the above: Only gets the adb path if it is an android test, and also try catches to be doubly safe. Note that the above PR did work for the android case, so as long as we don't break the non-android case the test will be running now: https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/staging/Linux_pixel_7pro%20android_verified_input_test/228/overview ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md --------- Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com> |
||
|
auto-submit[bot]
|
cffd3ab54f
|
Reverts "Fix verified input test failure in CI (attempt 4) (#178018)" (#178089)
<!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#178018 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: jtmcdole <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: The call to `adbPath` causes the tool to fail if ANDROID isn't installed. <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: gmackall <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {mboetger} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: I think this should actually fix at least the current issue. The last PR added logs https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/178005/ And we can now see: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8699078049543853521/+/u/run_android_verified_input_test/stdout ``` [2025-11-04 18:33:56.587985] [STDOUT] stdout: [+2998 ms] Expected: <0> [2025-11-04 18:33:56.588075] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Actual: <1> [2025-11-04 18:33:56.588106] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Stdout: [2025-11-04 18:33:56.588135] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Stderr: adb server version (41) doesn't match this client (39); killing... ``` The test was directly invoking adb (using whatever is on the path), while the devicelab harness has a more complicated way of finding adb and then invoking it directly. So it seems they have found different adb versions. This pr pipes the devicelab adb path through to the individual test, so the test can reference the same adb, and then uses it. This is again sort of an abuse of this environment map (if one of the tests decided to use these environment variables we would be in a weird state), but I think it isn't too bad, and again I think it is reasonable because any android devicelab test may wish to use adb, so this solution isn't hyper specific to the problem. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com> |
||
|
Gray Mackall
|
40acb0449f
|
Fix verified input test failure in CI (attempt 4) (#178018)
I think this should actually fix at least the current issue. The last PR added logs https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/178005/ And we can now see: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8699078049543853521/+/u/run_android_verified_input_test/stdout ``` [2025-11-04 18:33:56.587985] [STDOUT] stdout: [+2998 ms] Expected: <0> [2025-11-04 18:33:56.588075] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Actual: <1> [2025-11-04 18:33:56.588106] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Stdout: [2025-11-04 18:33:56.588135] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Stderr: adb server version (41) doesn't match this client (39); killing... ``` The test was directly invoking adb (using whatever is on the path), while the devicelab harness has a more complicated way of finding adb and then invoking it directly. So it seems they have found different adb versions. This pr pipes the devicelab adb path through to the individual test, so the test can reference the same adb, and then uses it. This is again sort of an abuse of this environment map (if one of the tests decided to use these environment variables we would be in a weird state), but I think it isn't too bad, and again I think it is reasonable because any android devicelab test may wish to use adb, so this solution isn't hyper specific to the problem. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com> |
||
|
Gray Mackall
|
8124e89c63
|
Fix verified input test in CI (attempt 2) (#177961)
From looking closer at the logs, I think the failure is that the adb command isn't specifying the device. This passes locally because I only have one device, but then fails on CI. I missed this when looking at the [logs](https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8699178787799824705/+/u/run_android_verified_input_test/stdout) originally: ``` [2025-11-03 15:50:32.967241] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] test_driver/main_test.dart 34:40 main.<fn>.<fn> [2025-11-03 15:50:35.960806] [STDOUT] stdout: [+2993 ms] Expected: <0> [2025-11-03 15:50:35.960858] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Actual: <1> [2025-11-03 15:50:35.960898] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] package:matcher/src/expect/expect.dart 149:31 fail [2025-11-03 15:50:35.960906] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] package:matcher/src/expect/expect.dart 144:3 _expect [2025-11-03 15:50:35.960946] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] package:matcher/src/expect/expect.dart 56:3 expect [2025-11-03 15:50:35.960957] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] test_driver/main_test.dart 44:7 main.<fn> ``` The failed expect there isn't related to the verification, it is an expect on the exit code of the adb command: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/dev/integration_tests/android_verified_input/test_driver/main_test.dart#L44 So the adb command is failing on CI. I think it is for the reason above. This change makes the device id available to the driver tests that are run by the devicelab harness, and then pipes it through to ADB. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com> |
||
|
Gray Mackall
|
48c77daf85
|
Re-enable android verified input devicelab test (#177804)
This was originally landed in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/140836/ but the pr did not hook it up to ci. It was then removed in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/162895/ First got the driver test running: `flutter drive -t lib/main.dart --driver test_driver/main_test.dart` from the directory of the test app then got the devicelab harness working via `../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t android_verified_input_test` from the `dev/devicelab` directory and then finally hooked up to ci with the configuration in the `.ci.yaml` Restoring in a passing state, in advance of landing https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/177572/ ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md --------- Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com> |
||
|
Matthew Kosarek
|
97c11cf89a
|
Implement Regular Windows for the win32 framework + add an example application for regular windows (#173715)
## What's new?
- Implement and test `_window_win32.dart`, the Win32 implementation of
`_window.dart` 🎉
- Wrote a bunch of tests in `window_win32_test.dart` which uses a mock
API barrier to mock the native Win32 layer
- Update `BaseWindowController` to extend `ChangeNotifier` and use it to
inform the `WindowScope` of when things change
- Made `RegularWindowController.empty()` a non-internal constructor, as
it is needed by implementations
- Added a _large_ example application for windowing where users can test
out different windowing concepts and see how they work!
To test, simply run the tests or try out the example app!
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
|
||
|
Harry Terkelsen
|
06ecbba302
|
[benchmarks] Allow passing --local-web-sdk and --build-mode flags to benchmarks (#175199)
This allows setting the `--local-web-sdk` and `--build-mode` flags to benchmarks. This makes it easier to debug benchmarks that only fail with local engine changes. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Elijah Okoroh
|
1eab8e1d13
|
Deprecate Objective-C plugin template (#174003)
This PR marks the `--ios-language objc` flag as deprecated for plugin creation. It introduces a warning message in the `flutter create` tool when the flag is used, but **does not** remove the functionality at this time. This is the first step towards its eventual removal. ## Context As discussed in the issue, usage metrics show that Objective-C is used in less than 4% of newly created plugins. To streamline the tool and align with modern iOS development practices (i.e., Swift), we are beginning the process of phasing out this option **Changes:** - Adds a deprecation warning to the CLI when the `objc` flag is used. - Updates the `--help` text to reflect the deprecation. - Removes obsolete tests for Objective-C plugin creation and usage tracking. ## Testing I have validated these changes by: 1. Manually running `flutter-dev create` with the `objc` flag to confirm the new deprecation warning appears. 2. Verifying that creating a plugin without the --ios-language flag does **not** trigger the warning. 3. Running the tests in the `test/commands.shard` to ensure no regressions were introduced. 4. CI will validate the changes to the devicelab tests. Fixes #169683 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [X] I signed the [CLA]. - [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [X] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Ben Konyi
|
33edd49421
|
[ Tool ] Remove support for experimental --fast-start feature (#173576)
This feature never worked correctly and has been disabled by default for years. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/49499 |
||
|
Ben Konyi
|
c4ce6a8ef7
|
Reapply "Make device debuggable if useDwdsWebSocketConnection is true … (#173551)" (#173628)
This reverts commit
|
||
|
auto-submit[bot]
|
17c92b7ba6
|
Reverts "Reapply "Make device debuggable if useDwdsWebSocketConnection is true … (#173551)" (#173568)" (#173587)
<!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#173568 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: bkonyi <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: Chrome isn't configured for the test configuration and is causing failures. <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: bkonyi <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {jyameo, matanlurey} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: This reverts commit e2a347b14a18729dd24c2cf3240ef22562195e2d. Previously reverted due to `*_chrome_dev_mode` tests failing on all platforms. <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com> |
||
|
Ben Konyi
|
a9fc145a3d
|
Reapply "Make device debuggable if useDwdsWebSocketConnection is true … (#173551)" (#173568)
This reverts commit e2a347b14a18729dd24c2cf3240ef22562195e2d. Previously reverted due to `*_chrome_dev_mode` tests failing on all platforms. |
||
|
Matthew Kosarek
|
69264e4a60
|
Add the 'windowing' feature flag and use to wrap an implementation for regular windows that always throws (#172478)
## What's new? - Added the `windowing` feature flag to the project - Created the internal `_window.dart` API with support for regular windows - Implemented a `_WindowingOwnerUnsupported` implementation of the `WindowingOwner` interface - Marked all points of the public API as `@internal` with a corresponding warning documentation - Threw an `UnsupportedError` where it is appropriate to do so Note that this PR does **NOT** include a real implementation of `WindowingOwner` (e.g. for win32 or macOS). That work will be opened as a follow up. This work is based off of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697 and http://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437, as well as this design document: https://docs.flutter.dev/go/multi-window-experimental-apis ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. --------- Co-authored-by: Loïc Sharma <737941+loic-sharma@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Ricardo Dalarme
|
56d5389456
|
Migrate to null aware elements - Part 5 (#172418)
## Description Continuing the work from @jamilsaadeh97 to replace verbose null checks with modern [null_aware_elements](https://dart.dev/tools/linter-rules/use_null_aware_elements) syntax. This PR cleans up the remaining files not covered in the previous parts, making the code more concise. ## Related PRs - https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/172198 - https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/172306 - https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/172307 - https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/172322 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. |
||
|
Loïc Sharma
|
6474b04e6d
|
Reland "Add feature flags to the framework" (#171545)
This relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437. The google3 fixes were landed in: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/171547, https://critique.corp.google.com/cl/781275353, https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/171933. This PR is split into two commits: 1. d6253794e8982348c5c21cb63e8f6bf785664be6, code from https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437 without any changes 2. f35d29e4af630d2d4fdb0cda8686b6ff9f77227a, updates the PR to omit obvious types. Original PR description: ## Motivation We'd like to let users opt-in to experimental features so that they can give early feedback while we iterate on the feature. For example: Example feature flags: 1. Android sensitive content: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/158473. When enabled, Flutter will tell Android when the view contains sensitive content like a password. 3. Desktop multi-window. When enabled, Flutter will use child windows to allow things like a context menu to "escape" outside of the current window. ### Use case Users will be able to turn on features by: * **Option 1**: Run `flutter config --enable-my-feature`. This enables the feature for all projects on the machine * **Option 2**: Add `enable-my-feature: true` in their `pubspec.yaml`, under the `flutter` section. This would enable the for a single project on the machine. Turning on a feature affects _both_ development-time (`flutter run`) and deployment-time (`flutter build x`). For example, I can `flutter build windows` to create an `.exe` with multi-window features enabled. ## How this works This adds a new [`runtimeId`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-0ded384225f19a4c34d43c7c11f7cb084ff3db947cfa82d8d52fc94c112bb2a7R243-R247) property to the tool's `Feature` class. If a feature is on and has a `runtimeId`, its `runtimeId` will be [stamped into the Dart application as a Dart define](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-bd662448bdc2e6f50e47cd3b20b22b41a828561bce65cb4d54ea4f5011cc604eR293-R327). The framework uses this Dart define to [determine which features are enabled](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-c8dbd5cd3103bc5be53c4ac5be8bdb9bf73e10cd5d8e4ac34e737fd1f8602d45). ### Multi-window example https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697 shows how this new feature flag system can be used to add a multi-window feature flag: 1. It adds a new [multi-window feature](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-0ded384225f19a4c34d43c7c11f7cb084ff3db947cfa82d8d52fc94c112bb2a7R189-R198) to the Flutter tool. This can be turned on using `flutter config --enable-multi-window` or by putting `enable-multi-window: true` in an app's .pubspec, under the `flutter` section. 2. It adds a new [`isMultiWindowEnabled`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-c8dbd5cd3103bc5be53c4ac5be8bdb9bf73e10cd5d8e4ac34e737fd1f8602d45R7-R11) property to the framework. 4. The Material library can use this new property to determine whether it should create a new window. [Example](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-2cbc1634ed6b61d61dfa090e7bfbbb7c60b74c8abc3a28df6f79eee691fd1b73). ## Limitations ### Tool and framework only For now, these feature flags are available only to the Flutter tool and Flutter framework. The flags are not automatically available to the embedder or the engine. For example, embedders need to configure their surfaces differently if Impeller is enabled. This configuration must happen before the Dart isolate is launched. As a result, the framework's feature flags is not a viable solution for this scenario for now. For these kinds of scenarios, we should continue to use platform-specific configuration like the `AndroidManifest.xml` or `Info.plist` files. This is a fixable limitation, we just need to invest in this plumbing :) ### Tree shaking Feature flags are not designed to help tree shaking. For example, you cannot conditionally import Dart code depending on the enabled feature flags. Code that is feature flagged off will still be imported into user's apps. |
||
|
Kate Lovett
|
a04fb324be
|
Bump Dart to 3.8 and reformat (#171703)
Bumps the Dart version to 3.8 across the repo (excluding engine/src/flutter/third_party) and applies formatting updates from Dart 3.8. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
auto-submit[bot]
|
c2cd71309f
|
Reverts "Add feature flags to the framework (#168437)" (#171542)
<!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#168437 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: chingjun <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: broke internal customers <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: loic-sharma <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {bkonyi, justinmc, matanlurey} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: ## Motivation We'd like to let users opt-in to experimental features so that they can give early feedback while we iterate on the feature. For example: Example feature flags: 1. Android sensitive content: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/158473. When enabled, Flutter will tell Android when the view contains sensitive content like a password. 2. Desktop multi-window. When enabled, Flutter will use child windows to allow things like a context menu to "escape" outside of the current window. ### Use case Users will be able to turn on features by: * **Option 1**: Run `flutter config --enable-my-feature`. This enables the feature for all projects on the machine * **Option 2**: Add `enable-my-feature: true` in their `pubspec.yaml`, under the `flutter` section. This would enable the for a single project on the machine. Turning on a feature affects _both_ development-time (`flutter run`) and deployment-time (`flutter build x`). For example, I can `flutter build windows` to create an `.exe` with multi-window features enabled. ## How this works This adds a new [`runtimeId`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-0ded384225f19a4c34d43c7c11f7cb084ff3db947cfa82d8d52fc94c112bb2a7R243-R247) property to the tool's `Feature` class. If a feature is on and has a `runtimeId`, its `runtimeId` will be [stamped into the Dart application as a Dart define](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-bd662448bdc2e6f50e47cd3b20b22b41a828561bce65cb4d54ea4f5011cc604eR293-R327). The framework uses this Dart define to [determine which features are enabled](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-c8dbd5cd3103bc5be53c4ac5be8bdb9bf73e10cd5d8e4ac34e737fd1f8602d45). ### Multi-window example https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697 shows how this new feature flag system can be used to add a multi-window feature flag: 1. It adds a new [multi-window feature](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-0ded384225f19a4c34d43c7c11f7cb084ff3db947cfa82d8d52fc94c112bb2a7R189-R198) to the Flutter tool. This can be turned on using `flutter config --enable-multi-window` or by putting `enable-multi-window: true` in an app's .pubspec, under the `flutter` section. 2. It adds a new [`isMultiWindowEnabled`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-c8dbd5cd3103bc5be53c4ac5be8bdb9bf73e10cd5d8e4ac34e737fd1f8602d45R7-R11) property to the framework. 3. The Material library can use this new property to determine whether it should create a new window. [Example](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-2cbc1634ed6b61d61dfa090e7bfbbb7c60b74c8abc3a28df6f79eee691fd1b73). ## Limitations ### Tool and framework only For now, these feature flags are available only to the Flutter tool and Flutter framework. The flags are not automatically available to the embedder or the engine. For example, embedders need to configure their surfaces differently if Impeller is enabled. This configuration must happen before the Dart isolate is launched. As a result, the framework's feature flags is not a viable solution for this scenario for now. For these kinds of scenarios, we should continue to use platform-specific configuration like the `AndroidManifest.xml` or `Info.plist` files. This is a fixable limitation, we just need to invest in this plumbing :) ### Tree shaking Feature flags are not designed to help tree shaking. For example, you cannot conditionally import Dart code depending on the enabled feature flags. Code that is feature flagged off will still be imported into user's apps. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com> |
||
|
Loïc Sharma
|
c6f9e801b2
|
Add feature flags to the framework (#168437)
## Motivation We'd like to let users opt-in to experimental features so that they can give early feedback while we iterate on the feature. For example: Example feature flags: 1. Android sensitive content: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/158473. When enabled, Flutter will tell Android when the view contains sensitive content like a password. 2. Desktop multi-window. When enabled, Flutter will use child windows to allow things like a context menu to "escape" outside of the current window. ### Use case Users will be able to turn on features by: * **Option 1**: Run `flutter config --enable-my-feature`. This enables the feature for all projects on the machine * **Option 2**: Add `enable-my-feature: true` in their `pubspec.yaml`, under the `flutter` section. This would enable the for a single project on the machine. Turning on a feature affects _both_ development-time (`flutter run`) and deployment-time (`flutter build x`). For example, I can `flutter build windows` to create an `.exe` with multi-window features enabled. ## How this works This adds a new [`runtimeId`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-0ded384225f19a4c34d43c7c11f7cb084ff3db947cfa82d8d52fc94c112bb2a7R243-R247) property to the tool's `Feature` class. If a feature is on and has a `runtimeId`, its `runtimeId` will be [stamped into the Dart application as a Dart define](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-bd662448bdc2e6f50e47cd3b20b22b41a828561bce65cb4d54ea4f5011cc604eR293-R327). The framework uses this Dart define to [determine which features are enabled](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-c8dbd5cd3103bc5be53c4ac5be8bdb9bf73e10cd5d8e4ac34e737fd1f8602d45). ### Multi-window example https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697 shows how this new feature flag system can be used to add a multi-window feature flag: 1. It adds a new [multi-window feature](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-0ded384225f19a4c34d43c7c11f7cb084ff3db947cfa82d8d52fc94c112bb2a7R189-R198) to the Flutter tool. This can be turned on using `flutter config --enable-multi-window` or by putting `enable-multi-window: true` in an app's .pubspec, under the `flutter` section. 2. It adds a new [`isMultiWindowEnabled`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-c8dbd5cd3103bc5be53c4ac5be8bdb9bf73e10cd5d8e4ac34e737fd1f8602d45R7-R11) property to the framework. 3. The Material library can use this new property to determine whether it should create a new window. [Example](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-2cbc1634ed6b61d61dfa090e7bfbbb7c60b74c8abc3a28df6f79eee691fd1b73). ## Limitations ### Tool and framework only For now, these feature flags are available only to the Flutter tool and Flutter framework. The flags are not automatically available to the embedder or the engine. For example, embedders need to configure their surfaces differently if Impeller is enabled. This configuration must happen before the Dart isolate is launched. As a result, the framework's feature flags is not a viable solution for this scenario for now. For these kinds of scenarios, we should continue to use platform-specific configuration like the `AndroidManifest.xml` or `Info.plist` files. This is a fixable limitation, we just need to invest in this plumbing :) ### Tree shaking Feature flags are not designed to help tree shaking. For example, you cannot conditionally import Dart code depending on the enabled feature flags. Code that is feature flagged off will still be imported into user's apps. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
auto-submit[bot]
|
5bdd0beed2
|
Reverts "add run_gradle_lock_files_check.dart for new PR's that modify gradle files (#169245)" (#170770)
<!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#169245 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: matanlurey <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: Increased the time of the test task `gradle_java8_compile_test` from about 5 minutes per run to over 30m, which hits the timeout causing tree failures. https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/luci.flutter.prod/Linux%20gradle_java8_compile_test <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: ash2moon <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {matanlurey} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: This commit checks if there have been any changes to the gradle files and if gradle lock files need updating. If so, it will alert then PR owner to update their PR with the new gradle lock file.s Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/163228 Example test run: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8712427303492230593/+/u/run_gradle_java8_compile_test/stdout?format=raw This was added as an existing test under Linux gradle_java8_compile_test because benchmarking results showed on average about 3min 30s to run on my local M2 Mac. SInce it is not > 10min to run, placing it inside an existing test case was ideal. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com> |
||
|
ash2moon
|
22dc6b6566
|
add run_gradle_lock_files_check.dart for new PR's that modify gradle files (#169245)
This commit checks if there have been any changes to the gradle files and if gradle lock files need updating. If so, it will alert then PR owner to update their PR with the new gradle lock file.s Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/163228 Example test run: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8712427303492230593/+/u/run_gradle_java8_compile_test/stdout?format=raw This was added as an existing test under Linux gradle_java8_compile_test because benchmarking results showed on average about 3min 30s to run on my local M2 Mac. SInce it is not > 10min to run, placing it inside an existing test case was ideal. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Daco Harkes
|
5bee4880b9
|
Reland "[native assets] Build dev dependencies in flutter test integration_test" (#170728)
Reland https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/170686. Closes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/168961. Original PR in first commit. Fix in subsequent commit: * Do process invocation of `flutter pub add` in a different way. Fixes: `ProcessException: %1 is not a valid Win32 application` Reproduced locally by changing dev/devicelab/bin/tasks/native_assets_android.dart to `DeviceOperatingSystem.windows` and verified the `flutter pub add` call now succeeds. (Also, moved the add integration test into the create test project to avoid having multiple `flutter pub get`s.) Third time is the charm. |
||
|
auto-submit[bot]
|
d108234670
|
Reverts "Reland "[native assets] Build dev dependencies in flutter test integration_test" (#170686)" (#170718)
<!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#170686 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: matanlurey <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: Broke [`Windows_mokey native_assets_android`](https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Windows_mokey%20native_assets_android/2518/overview) again. <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: dcharkes <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {bkonyi, matanlurey} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: Reland https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/170374 Original PR in first commit. Fixes in subsequent commits: * `flutter` is not on the `PATH` in the device lab, use `_flutterBin` (consistent with the rest of the test). Fixes `flutter` not found. * `flutter test integration_test` now does not build assets for the host anymore. `flutter test` builds assets for the host. The `TestCommand` is now special-case to check for `_isIntegrationTest`. Fixes `clang++` not found. (It's the compiler for Linux, but we are running integration tests on an Android device.) Tests pass locally with: ``` $ cd /Users/dacoharkes/src/flutter/flutter/dev/devicelab && dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t native_assets_android ``` Note: * The device lab tests are not run on presubmit until https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/170682 is addressed. * The emulator tests are not run at all atm: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/170529. <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com> |
||
|
Daco Harkes
|
b5dbfc3a42
|
Reland "[native assets] Build dev dependencies in flutter test integration_test" (#170686)
Reland https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/170374 Original PR in first commit. Fixes in subsequent commits: * `flutter` is not on the `PATH` in the device lab, use `_flutterBin` (consistent with the rest of the test). Fixes `flutter` not found. * `flutter test integration_test` now does not build assets for the host anymore. `flutter test` builds assets for the host. The `TestCommand` is now special-case to check for `_isIntegrationTest`. Fixes `clang++` not found. (It's the compiler for Linux, but we are running integration tests on an Android device.) Tests pass locally with: ``` $ cd /Users/dacoharkes/src/flutter/flutter/dev/devicelab && dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t native_assets_android ``` Note: * The device lab tests are not run on presubmit until https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/170682 is addressed. * The emulator tests are not run at all atm: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/170529. |
||
|
auto-submit[bot]
|
a33b81c3f9
|
Reverts "[native assets] Build dev dependencies in flutter test integration_test (#170374)" (#170673)
<!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#170374 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: jtmcdole <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: "Consistently failed across all 3 executions" <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: dcharkes <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {vashworth, bkonyi} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: Closes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/168961 This PR ensures the build hooks of `dev_dependencies` are run on `flutter test integration_test`. `flutter test` already builds dev dependencies. However, `package:integration_test` is using `flutter assemble` which should not have dev dependencies included (`flutter build` should not bundle dev deps). ~~So, this PR adds a build define that's threaded through from `flutter test` to `flutter assemble`. It's threaded through gradle and xcode via `BuildInfo` and subsequently read in tool backend where it is added as an `Environment` define. Finally it is read in the `Target` that builds the native assets.~~ ~~One quirk is `flutter run test integration_test -d flutter-tester`. (No idea why someone would run that, but it works.) This doesn't spin up Gradle or XCode. So the environment is set directly.~~ Edit: We use the simpler `kBuildMode` to decide whether to include the native assets for dev dependencies. ## Testing * The desktop OSes and `flutter-tester` are tested in `packages/flutter_tools/test/integration.shard/isolated/native_assets_test.dart`. * iOS simulator, device, and Android device are tested in the device lab. * (All tests were added to existing tests, hopefully these don't start timing out.) ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com> |
||
|
Daco Harkes
|
02abf62968
|
[native assets] Build dev dependencies in flutter test integration_test (#170374)
Closes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/168961 This PR ensures the build hooks of `dev_dependencies` are run on `flutter test integration_test`. `flutter test` already builds dev dependencies. However, `package:integration_test` is using `flutter assemble` which should not have dev dependencies included (`flutter build` should not bundle dev deps). ~~So, this PR adds a build define that's threaded through from `flutter test` to `flutter assemble`. It's threaded through gradle and xcode via `BuildInfo` and subsequently read in tool backend where it is added as an `Environment` define. Finally it is read in the `Target` that builds the native assets.~~ ~~One quirk is `flutter run test integration_test -d flutter-tester`. (No idea why someone would run that, but it works.) This doesn't spin up Gradle or XCode. So the environment is set directly.~~ Edit: We use the simpler `kBuildMode` to decide whether to include the native assets for dev dependencies. ## Testing * The desktop OSes and `flutter-tester` are tested in `packages/flutter_tools/test/integration.shard/isolated/native_assets_test.dart`. * iOS simulator, device, and Android device are tested in the device lab. * (All tests were added to existing tests, hopefully these don't start timing out.) ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Victoria Ashworth
|
22c916a2c0
|
Pause UIScene migration (#170490)
UIScene migration is not yet enforced by Apple so we have some more time to handle this. Let's pause on auto-migrating projects. Reland of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/170457. This PR differs as it keeps our tests migrated to UI Scene lifecycle. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
LouiseHsu
|
269771548f
|
Add time to first frame for Mac_arm64_ios imitation_game_swiftui (#167602)
Partially addresses https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/154138 Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/170386 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. |
||
|
Jenn Magder
|
d3170f4a96
|
Remove deprecated Objective-C iOS app create template (#169547)
Remove Objective-C template for new apps. Existing apps won't be impacted. Keep Objective-C templates for plugins, though their example apps will be Swift instead. See https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148586#issuecomment-2121323676 Move `templates/app/ios-swift.tmpl` to `templates/app/ios.tmpl`. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148586 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
MarkZ
|
08cb3936a7
|
Explicitly disabling hot reload for non-hot-reload web debug benchmarks (#170006)
Ensures that flipping our defaults for web hot reload won't affect our benchmarks. |
||
|
Moritz
|
70aa4b3e54
|
Workspace (#169556)
Reland after https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/169844. Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected packages. Assumptions: 1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`, `flutter_test`, and `flutter`. 2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter, flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other. Based on these assumptions, we use https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace. The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`, with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run `flutter upgrade`. There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and `packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely `packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger change, and out of the scope of this PR. This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a seamless transition. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
auto-submit[bot]
|
4372bfbc6c
|
Reverts "Add workspace (#169451)" (#169468)
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#169451
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: matanlurey
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Broke a number of post-submit tests
(ios_app_extension, packages_autoroller).
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: mosuem
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {matanlurey}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
Reland after #169357.
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
|
||
|
Moritz
|
3a0897a336
|
Add workspace (#169451)
Reland after #169357. Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected packages. Assumptions: 1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`, `flutter_test`, and `flutter`. 2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter, flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other. Based on these assumptions, we use https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace. The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`, with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run `flutter upgrade`. There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and `packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely `packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger change, and out of the scope of this PR. This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a seamless transition. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
auto-submit[bot]
|
e0c42c6e38
|
Reverts "Use pub workspace (#168662)" (#169357)
<!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#168662 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: matanlurey <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: Broke integration tests that do not run on presubmit: - https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Mac_arm64%20macos_chrome_dev_mode/8715/overview - https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Linux_pixel_7pro%20linux_chrome_dev_mode/7617/overview <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: mosuem <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {matanlurey} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected packages. Assumptions: 1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`, `flutter_test`, and `flutter`. 2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter, flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other. Based on these assumptions, we use https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace. The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`, with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run `flutter upgrade`. There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and `packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely `packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger change, and out of the scope of this PR. This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a seamless transition. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com> |
||
|
Moritz
|
9a1dc1bd96
|
Use pub workspace (#168662)
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
|
||
|
Daco Harkes
|
534b250a56
|
[native assets] Graduate to preview (#169194)
This PR enables native assets on the main and dev channel by default, and make native assets available on the beta channel. This PR removes the flag from invocations. The helper packages (`package:hooks` and `package:code_assets`) will stay 0.x for now, until the SDK constraint can be bumped to a beta release and we're happy with the Dart API. Corresponding Dart CL: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/429920 Issue: * https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/129757 Project: https://github.com/orgs/dart-lang/projects/99/ |
||
|
Loïc Sharma
|
4b1d2644cb
|
Fix keyboard_hot_restart_ios flakes (#168518)
The keyboard hot restart test does these steps: 1. It launches an app that forces the keyboard to be visible 2. It checks that the keyboard is visible by examining the app's logs 3. It updates the app to no longer force the keyboard to be visible and hot restarts the app 4. It checks that the keyboard is no longer visible by examining the app's logs Previously, the test app printed the keyboard status whenever the app rebuilt. The test would move on as soon as it saw a log that indicates the keyboard was in the expected state. However, since the app could log the keyboard's visibility _before_ the Dart VM was available, hot restart commands could be ignored (or at least, that's my theory from the DeviceLab logs). Now, the test app prints the keyboard status non-stop. The test now waits until the Dart VM is available before checking if the logs indicate the keyboard is open. Also, the test now waits until the hot restart has completed before checking if the keyboard is closed. In theory, this should ensure that hot restart does not happen until after the Dart VM is available. Follow-up to: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/167013 Part of: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/10713 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md |
||
|
Matan Lurey
|
806057be59
|
Use config: enable-swift-...: false, remove disable-swift-...: true. (#168433)
This PR moves project-specific configuration from:
```yaml
flutter:
disable-swift-package-manager: true
```
to:
```yaml
flutter:
config:
enable-swift-package-manager: false
```
|
||
|
Jason Simmons
|
dce18b6fd9
|
Capture errors when running flutter_tools in the entrypoint_dart_registrant devicelab test (#168411)
See https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/168405 |
||
|
MarkZ
|
f794a58262
|
Using headless=new for Chrome macrobenchmarks (#168256)
My newly added DDC macrobenchmarks tests have been timing out on the test infra. It turns out that `headless` Chrome is significantly slower than headful Chrome (reasons unknown, but perhaps related to hardware acceleration). Using `--headless=new` instead of `flutter run`'s headless flag (which uses the old headless mode) makes my local runs significantly (10x+) faster. *This time for sure* |
||
|
MarkZ
|
761566b5d8
|
Running Chrome macrobenchmarks in headless mode (#168104)
Bypasses this error in the test infra `[2025-04-30 20:32:46.191597] [STDOUT] [CHROME STDERR]: [CHROME]:[3497:3497:0430/203246.172288:ERROR:ozone_platform_x11.cc(244)] Missing X server or $DISPLAY`. |
||
|
MarkZ
|
ab585242cb
|
Using --no-sandbox for Chrome DDC benchmarks (#168010)
Resolves this error on the bots (I hope!): ``` [2025-04-29 15:56:48.817223] [STDOUT] [CHROME STDERR]: [CHROME]:[41258:41258:0429/155648.790553:FATAL:zygote_host_impl_linux.cc(126)] No usable sandbox! Update your kernel or see https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/linux/suid_sandbox_development.md for more information on developing with the SUID sandbox. If you want to live dangerously and need an immediate workaround, you can try using --no-sandbox. ``` |
||
|
MarkZ
|
2a3e27fdd9
|
Adding support for macrobenchmarking with "flutter run" (#167692)
Notable changes: * Allows macrobenchmarks to run via `flutter run`. * Splits macrobenchmarking between "orchestration logic" and "app serving" (served on separate ports on the same machine to keep the scheme consistent with the `flutter build` path). * Adds an intercepted entrypoint for web benchmarks. We can't pass flags to the app since it's not supported, so I've hard-coded the orchestration server's port. * Adding logic to connect to an existing Chrome debugger instance (vs spawning one) for benchmarks. |
||
|
Loïc Sharma
|
b65ff54de2
|
Improve log output of keyboard_hot_restart_ios (#167834)
The keyboard hot restart test listens to `flutter run` logs and then does an action. However, the test prints the `flutter run` log after the action. This results in confusing logs. For example: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8716606099574306145/+/u/run_keyboard_hot_restart_ios/stdout ``` ═══════════╡ ••• Launch app and wait for keyboard to be visible ••• ╞═══════════ ... stdout: Installing and launching... 37.2s stdout: Syncing files to device swarming’s iPhone... ════╡ ••• Update the app to no longer force the keyboard to be visible ••• ╞════ ════════════════════════╡ ••• Hot restart the app ••• ╞═════════════════════════ ════════════╡ ••• Wait until the keyboard is no longer visible ••• ╞════════════ stdout: flutter: Keyboard is open ``` Here, the test waits until the keyboard is visible before moving onto the test's next step. However, the log that triggers this action (`flutter: Keyboard is open`) is printed after the action was taken (`Update the app to no longer force the keyboard to be visible` and `Wait until the keyboard is no longer visible`). This is confusing. Follow-up to: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/167013 Part of: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/10713 |