flutter_flutter

mirror of https://github.com/flutter/flutter.git synced 2026-01-09 07:51:35 +08:00

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Ben Konyi	f075078a7d	[ Infra ] Ignore non-fatal Gradle daemon "termination" message (#180645 ) Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/177371	2026-01-07 17:41:03 +00:00
gaaclarke	5632701286	Moved high bitrate texture tests to engine (#179906 ) This adds a few goldens where skia supports the file format. This is a bit more scalable and direct than managing integration tests. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md	2025-12-18 17:04:34 +00:00
Gray Mackall	91cc68f695	[Reland] Unmodified android sdk bundle (#179920 ) Relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/179647 There were only two failing tests (there were also two bringup failures, the `mac_arm64_mokey` versions of these) https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Mac_mokey%20run_release_test/3866/overview https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Mac_mokey%20run_debug_test_android/5454/overview They failed with the same logs ``` Task result: { "success": false, "reason": "Task failed: flutter run had unexpected output on standard error." } ``` The stderr in question: ``` [2025-12-15 14:06:56.311794] [STDOUT] run:stderr: - integration_test requires Android NDK 28.2.13676358 [2025-12-15 14:06:56.311989] [STDOUT] run:stderr: Fix this issue by using the highest Android NDK version (they are backward compatible). [2025-12-15 14:06:56.312019] [STDOUT] run:stderr: Add the following to /opt/s/w/ir/x/w/rc/tmpr6kj09d_/flutter sdk/dev/integration_tests/ui/android/app/build.gradle: [2025-12-15 14:06:56.312074] [STDOUT] run:stderr: [2025-12-15 14:06:56.312092] [STDOUT] run:stderr: android { [2025-12-15 14:06:56.312144] [STDOUT] run:stderr: ndkVersion = "28.2.13676358" [2025-12-15 14:06:56.312162] [STDOUT] run:stderr: ... [2025-12-15 14:06:56.312205] [STDOUT] run:stderr: } ``` We can just set the ndk version to `flutter.ndkVersion`, which is this value. It's also what is set in the templates, so it isn't a hack that doesn't represent a real flutter app. Verified the tests pass now with ``` ../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t run_release_test ../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t run_debug_test_android ``` ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md --------- Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com>	2025-12-16 19:34:38 +00:00
auto-submit[bot]	8edbbb7391	Reverts "Unmodified android sdk bundle (#179647 )" (#179904 ) <!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#179647 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: gmackall <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: Mac_mokey run_release_test failing <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: gmackall <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {reidbaker, jtmcdole} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: Changes our cipd hosted android sdk+ndk bundle to no longer modify directory structure from what Android directly provides, allowing AGP to find the ndk automatically and preventing downloading. 1. Changes the `create_cipd_packages.sh` script so we don't move the ndk 2. Uses the new script to upload a [36v4unmodified](https://chrome-infra-packages.appspot.com/p/flutter/android/sdk/all/linux-amd64/+/version:36v4unmodified) bundle 3. Changes DEPS+ci.yaml to reference the new bundle 4. Changes GN build rules accordingly 5. Removes special config in existing build.gradle files to point at the location of the ndk - agp should now know where it is without conig 6. For some tests, passes in an environment variable pointing to the ndk location, to override the environment variable passed by the recipes. This variable is respected by the tool, so the recipes passing it, pointing to the wrong place, is problematic. After this change lands we can stop passing it in the recipes, and then we can remove this special config in the tests. But adding it temporarily allows us to make this change without coordinating a recipes change at the same moment, and probably breaking things out of band. Logs from a random postsubmit run of `Mac build_android_host_app_with_module_aar` on the tree currently: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8695664517253382913/+/u/run_build_android_host_app_with_module_aar/stdout We see > [2025-12-12 10:49:49.223087] [STDOUT] stdout: Checking the license for package NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 in /Volumes/Work/s/w/ir/cache/android/sdk/licenses [2025-12-12 10:49:49.223221] [STDOUT] stdout: License for package NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 accepted. [2025-12-12 10:49:49.223268] [STDOUT] stdout: Preparing "Install NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358". [2025-12-12 10:50:14.093824] [STDOUT] stdout: "Install NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358" ready. [2025-12-12 10:50:14.093909] [STDOUT] stdout: Installing NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 in /Volumes/Work/s/w/ir/cache/android/sdk/ndk/28.2.13676358 [2025-12-12 10:50:14.093947] [STDOUT] stdout: "Install NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358" complete. [2025-12-12 10:50:14.410724] [STDOUT] stdout: "Install NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358" finished. Example of no longer downloading: Logs from a presubmit run: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8695732180931529361/+/u/run_build_android_host_app_with_module_aar/stdout We don't see these logs. We still see android build tools downloading - we can probably tackle that in another pr. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [ ] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [ ] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [ ] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [ ] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [ ] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>	2025-12-15 21:55:49 +00:00
Gray Mackall	c0b808c9ed	Unmodified android sdk bundle (#179647 ) Changes our cipd hosted android sdk+ndk bundle to no longer modify directory structure from what Android directly provides, allowing AGP to find the ndk automatically and preventing downloading. 1. Changes the `create_cipd_packages.sh` script so we don't move the ndk 2. Uses the new script to upload a [36v4unmodified](https://chrome-infra-packages.appspot.com/p/flutter/android/sdk/all/linux-amd64/+/version:36v4unmodified) bundle 3. Changes DEPS+ci.yaml to reference the new bundle 4. Changes GN build rules accordingly 5. Removes special config in existing build.gradle files to point at the location of the ndk - agp should now know where it is without conig 6. For some tests, passes in an environment variable pointing to the ndk location, to override the environment variable passed by the recipes. This variable is respected by the tool, so the recipes passing it, pointing to the wrong place, is problematic. After this change lands we can stop passing it in the recipes, and then we can remove this special config in the tests. But adding it temporarily allows us to make this change without coordinating a recipes change at the same moment, and probably breaking things out of band. Logs from a random postsubmit run of `Mac build_android_host_app_with_module_aar` on the tree currently: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8695664517253382913/+/u/run_build_android_host_app_with_module_aar/stdout We see > [2025-12-12 10:49:49.223087] [STDOUT] stdout: Checking the license for package NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 in /Volumes/Work/s/w/ir/cache/android/sdk/licenses [2025-12-12 10:49:49.223221] [STDOUT] stdout: License for package NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 accepted. [2025-12-12 10:49:49.223268] [STDOUT] stdout: Preparing "Install NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358". [2025-12-12 10:50:14.093824] [STDOUT] stdout: "Install NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358" ready. [2025-12-12 10:50:14.093909] [STDOUT] stdout: Installing NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 in /Volumes/Work/s/w/ir/cache/android/sdk/ndk/28.2.13676358 [2025-12-12 10:50:14.093947] [STDOUT] stdout: "Install NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358" complete. [2025-12-12 10:50:14.410724] [STDOUT] stdout: "Install NDK (Side by side) 28.2.13676358 v.28.2.13676358" finished. Example of no longer downloading: Logs from a presubmit run: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8695732180931529361/+/u/run_build_android_host_app_with_module_aar/stdout We don't see these logs. We still see android build tools downloading - we can probably tackle that in another pr. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [ ] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [ ] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [ ] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [ ] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [ ] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md --------- Co-authored-by: DoLT <dolt@guide.inc> Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com> Co-authored-by: John "codefu" McDole <john@mcdole.org>	2025-12-15 20:18:31 +00:00
Ben Konyi	49b416cf72	Unpin `package:dwds` dependency (#179462 ) Refactoring of code in `package:dwds` `26.2.1` changed execution ordering enough for a race condition in the web benchmark harness to be hit. This change updates the web benchmark harness to not rely on waiting for console output from the spawned browser which can be missed. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/178326 --------- Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>	2025-12-05 00:59:02 +00:00
Elijah Okoroh	0b191ba123	Add shared Darwin implementation for plugins (#176495 ) This PR introduces support for creating Flutter plugins with a single, shared implementation for iOS and macOS. This is enabled by a new darwin platform option in the flutter create command, which simplifies code maintenance and reduces duplication for plugin authors. List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue. An issue is not required if the PR fixes something trivial like a typo. Fixes #161019 If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy]. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [X] I signed the [CLA]. - [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [X] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md	2025-11-26 23:00:42 +00:00
Kate Lovett	9d96df2364	Modernize framework lints (#179089 ) WIP Commits separated as follows: - Update lints in analysis_options files - Run `dart fix --apply` - Clean up leftover analysis issues - Run `dart format .` in the right places. Local analysis and testing passes. Checking CI now. Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/178827 - Adoption of flutter_lints in examples/api coming in a separate change (cc @loic-sharma) ## Pre-launch Checklist - [ ] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [ ] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [ ] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [ ] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [ ] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md	2025-11-26 01:10:39 +00:00
b-luk	59945af629	Add macrobenchmark perf test for drawing arcs (#178690 ) Adding a benchmark so the impact of #178269 can be measured. ![](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fea307a7-c2d0-4058-ac5f-4e195b5bec23) ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md	2025-11-20 23:50:37 +00:00
gaaclarke	33a30cb318	Impeller: Allows R32G32B32A32_SFLOAT images (#177959 ) fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/141289 design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zpkMutZkqo2GVdMhiKzFURpgN8JDZTjtIVwwqqHKM90/edit?tab=t.0 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md	2025-11-13 22:28:01 +00:00
Gray Mackall	77cb77b947	Fix verified input integration test without breaking the rest of the devicelab tests (attempt 5) (#178093 ) Reland of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/178018/ On top of the above: Only gets the adb path if it is an android test, and also try catches to be doubly safe. Note that the above PR did work for the android case, so as long as we don't break the non-android case the test will be running now: https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/staging/Linux_pixel_7pro%20android_verified_input_test/228/overview ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md --------- Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com>	2025-11-06 18:38:26 +00:00
auto-submit[bot]	cffd3ab54f	Reverts "Fix verified input test failure in CI (attempt 4) (#178018 )" (#178089 ) <!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#178018 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: jtmcdole <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: The call to `adbPath` causes the tool to fail if ANDROID isn't installed. <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: gmackall <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {mboetger} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: I think this should actually fix at least the current issue. The last PR added logs https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/178005/ And we can now see: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8699078049543853521/+/u/run_android_verified_input_test/stdout ``` [2025-11-04 18:33:56.587985] [STDOUT] stdout: [+2998 ms] Expected: <0> [2025-11-04 18:33:56.588075] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Actual: <1> [2025-11-04 18:33:56.588106] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Stdout: [2025-11-04 18:33:56.588135] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Stderr: adb server version (41) doesn't match this client (39); killing... ``` The test was directly invoking adb (using whatever is on the path), while the devicelab harness has a more complicated way of finding adb and then invoking it directly. So it seems they have found different adb versions. This pr pipes the devicelab adb path through to the individual test, so the test can reference the same adb, and then uses it. This is again sort of an abuse of this environment map (if one of the tests decided to use these environment variables we would be in a weird state), but I think it isn't too bad, and again I think it is reasonable because any android devicelab test may wish to use adb, so this solution isn't hyper specific to the problem. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>	2025-11-06 02:27:27 +00:00
Gray Mackall	40acb0449f	Fix verified input test failure in CI (attempt 4) (#178018 ) I think this should actually fix at least the current issue. The last PR added logs https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/178005/ And we can now see: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8699078049543853521/+/u/run_android_verified_input_test/stdout ``` [2025-11-04 18:33:56.587985] [STDOUT] stdout: [+2998 ms] Expected: <0> [2025-11-04 18:33:56.588075] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Actual: <1> [2025-11-04 18:33:56.588106] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Stdout: [2025-11-04 18:33:56.588135] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Stderr: adb server version (41) doesn't match this client (39); killing... ``` The test was directly invoking adb (using whatever is on the path), while the devicelab harness has a more complicated way of finding adb and then invoking it directly. So it seems they have found different adb versions. This pr pipes the devicelab adb path through to the individual test, so the test can reference the same adb, and then uses it. This is again sort of an abuse of this environment map (if one of the tests decided to use these environment variables we would be in a weird state), but I think it isn't too bad, and again I think it is reasonable because any android devicelab test may wish to use adb, so this solution isn't hyper specific to the problem. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com>	2025-11-05 22:43:27 +00:00
Gray Mackall	8124e89c63	Fix verified input test in CI (attempt 2) (#177961 ) From looking closer at the logs, I think the failure is that the adb command isn't specifying the device. This passes locally because I only have one device, but then fails on CI. I missed this when looking at the [logs](https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8699178787799824705/+/u/run_android_verified_input_test/stdout) originally: ``` [2025-11-03 15:50:32.967241] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] test_driver/main_test.dart 34:40 main.<fn>.<fn> [2025-11-03 15:50:35.960806] [STDOUT] stdout: [+2993 ms] Expected: <0> [2025-11-03 15:50:35.960858] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] Actual: <1> [2025-11-03 15:50:35.960898] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] package:matcher/src/expect/expect.dart 149:31 fail [2025-11-03 15:50:35.960906] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] package:matcher/src/expect/expect.dart 144:3 _expect [2025-11-03 15:50:35.960946] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] package:matcher/src/expect/expect.dart 56:3 expect [2025-11-03 15:50:35.960957] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] test_driver/main_test.dart 44:7 main.<fn> ``` The failed expect there isn't related to the verification, it is an expect on the exit code of the adb command: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/dev/integration_tests/android_verified_input/test_driver/main_test.dart#L44 So the adb command is failing on CI. I think it is for the reason above. This change makes the device id available to the driver tests that are run by the devicelab harness, and then pipes it through to ADB. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com>	2025-11-04 18:32:28 +00:00
Gray Mackall	48c77daf85	Re-enable android verified input devicelab test (#177804 ) This was originally landed in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/140836/ but the pr did not hook it up to ci. It was then removed in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/162895/ First got the driver test running: `flutter drive -t lib/main.dart --driver test_driver/main_test.dart` from the directory of the test app then got the devicelab harness working via `../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t android_verified_input_test` from the `dev/devicelab` directory and then finally hooked up to ci with the configuration in the `.ci.yaml` Restoring in a passing state, in advance of landing https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/177572/ ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md --------- Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com>	2025-10-31 19:40:14 +00:00
Matthew Kosarek	97c11cf89a	Implement Regular Windows for the win32 framework + add an example application for regular windows (#173715 ) ## What's new? - Implement and test `_window_win32.dart`, the Win32 implementation of `_window.dart` 🎉 - Wrote a bunch of tests in `window_win32_test.dart` which uses a mock API barrier to mock the native Win32 layer - Update `BaseWindowController` to extend `ChangeNotifier` and use it to inform the `WindowScope` of when things change - Made `RegularWindowController.empty()` a non-internal constructor, as it is needed by implementations - Added a _large_ example application for windowing where users can test out different windowing concepts and see how they work! To test, simply run the tests or try out the example app! ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing.	2025-09-26 13:37:02 +00:00
Harry Terkelsen	06ecbba302	[benchmarks] Allow passing --local-web-sdk and --build-mode flags to benchmarks (#175199 ) This allows setting the `--local-web-sdk` and `--build-mode` flags to benchmarks. This makes it easier to debug benchmarks that only fail with local engine changes. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md	2025-09-16 20:15:11 +00:00
Elijah Okoroh	1eab8e1d13	Deprecate Objective-C plugin template (#174003 ) This PR marks the `--ios-language objc` flag as deprecated for plugin creation. It introduces a warning message in the `flutter create` tool when the flag is used, but does not remove the functionality at this time. This is the first step towards its eventual removal. ## Context As discussed in the issue, usage metrics show that Objective-C is used in less than 4% of newly created plugins. To streamline the tool and align with modern iOS development practices (i.e., Swift), we are beginning the process of phasing out this option Changes: - Adds a deprecation warning to the CLI when the `objc` flag is used. - Updates the `--help` text to reflect the deprecation. - Removes obsolete tests for Objective-C plugin creation and usage tracking. ## Testing I have validated these changes by: 1. Manually running `flutter-dev create` with the `objc` flag to confirm the new deprecation warning appears. 2. Verifying that creating a plugin without the --ios-language flag does not trigger the warning. 3. Running the tests in the `test/commands.shard` to ensure no regressions were introduced. 4. CI will validate the changes to the devicelab tests. Fixes #169683 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [X] I signed the [CLA]. - [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [X] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md	2025-09-15 22:13:52 +00:00
Ben Konyi	87d5b75319	[ Device Lab ] Add regression testing for flutter/flutter#174952 (#174956 ) Also switches to using a regex group to match the device state instead of splitting the matched string on '='. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/174952 --------- Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>	2025-09-05 15:40:29 +00:00
Ben Konyi	850412cfee	[ Device Lab ] Fix wakefulness check to only match log entries with string values (#174953 ) Sometimes there can be multiple wakefulness log entries (e.g., 'mWakefulness=Awake' and 'mWakefulness=1'), but we only care about the entry with a string value. --------- Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>	2025-09-04 17:03:37 +00:00
Ben Konyi	33edd49421	[ Tool ] Remove support for experimental `--fast-start` feature (#173576 ) This feature never worked correctly and has been disabled by default for years. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/49499	2025-09-02 19:50:01 +00:00
Jamil Saadeh	f26eddba00	Null aware elements clean-ups (#173074 ) <!-- Thanks for filing a pull request! Reviewers are typically assigned within a week of filing a request. To learn more about code review, see our documentation on Tree Hygiene: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md --> Converted more null checks to null aware elements. The analyzer had many false negatives and the regex became pretty wild to find many of them 😂 I've found more in the engine folder but I'll apply the changes in a separate PR Part of #172188 If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy]. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md	2025-08-13 15:36:14 +00:00
Ben Konyi	8c358779aa	[ Tool ] Fix run_linux_chrome_dev_mode (#173647 ) It's possible for Chrome to open with two tabs pointing to localhost, which was causing this test to fail. This change updates the Chrome connection logic to look for the specific URL Chrome was told to navigate to at launch, if one was provided.	2025-08-12 21:13:24 +00:00
Ben Konyi	c4ce6a8ef7	Reapply "Make device debuggable if useDwdsWebSocketConnection is true … (#173551 )" (#173628 ) This reverts commit `17c92b7ba6`. Also added Chrome + `chromedriver` dependencies for the `chrome_dev_mode` configurations.	2025-08-12 17:23:19 +00:00
auto-submit[bot]	17c92b7ba6	Reverts "Reapply "Make device debuggable if useDwdsWebSocketConnection is true … (#173551 )" (#173568 )" (#173587 ) <!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#173568 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: bkonyi <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: Chrome isn't configured for the test configuration and is causing failures. <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: bkonyi <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {jyameo, matanlurey} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: This reverts commit e2a347b14a18729dd24c2cf3240ef22562195e2d. Previously reverted due to `*_chrome_dev_mode` tests failing on all platforms. <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>	2025-08-11 22:15:48 +00:00
Ben Konyi	a9fc145a3d	Reapply "Make device debuggable if useDwdsWebSocketConnection is true … (#173551 )" (#173568 ) This reverts commit e2a347b14a18729dd24c2cf3240ef22562195e2d. Previously reverted due to `*_chrome_dev_mode` tests failing on all platforms.	2025-08-11 20:43:29 +00:00
Matthew Kosarek	69264e4a60	Add the 'windowing' feature flag and use to wrap an implementation for regular windows that always throws (#172478 ) ## What's new? - Added the `windowing` feature flag to the project - Created the internal `_window.dart` API with support for regular windows - Implemented a `_WindowingOwnerUnsupported` implementation of the `WindowingOwner` interface - Marked all points of the public API as `@internal` with a corresponding warning documentation - Threw an `UnsupportedError` where it is appropriate to do so Note that this PR does NOT include a real implementation of `WindowingOwner` (e.g. for win32 or macOS). That work will be opened as a follow up. This work is based off of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697 and http://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437, as well as this design document: https://docs.flutter.dev/go/multi-window-experimental-apis ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. --------- Co-authored-by: Loïc Sharma <737941+loic-sharma@users.noreply.github.com>	2025-08-04 17:54:53 +00:00
Ricardo Dalarme	56d5389456	Migrate to null aware elements - Part 5 (#172418 ) ## Description Continuing the work from @jamilsaadeh97 to replace verbose null checks with modern [null_aware_elements](https://dart.dev/tools/linter-rules/use_null_aware_elements) syntax. This PR cleans up the remaining files not covered in the previous parts, making the code more concise. ## Related PRs - https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/172198 - https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/172306 - https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/172307 - https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/172322 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing.	2025-07-30 18:40:09 +00:00
Matan Lurey	0e7da1d019	Remove deprecated `AssetManifest.json` file (#172594 ) Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143577.	2025-07-25 20:20:34 +00:00
Loïc Sharma	6474b04e6d	Reland "Add feature flags to the framework" (#171545 ) This relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437. The google3 fixes were landed in: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/171547, https://critique.corp.google.com/cl/781275353, https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/171933. This PR is split into two commits: 1. d6253794e8982348c5c21cb63e8f6bf785664be6, code from https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437 without any changes 2. f35d29e4af630d2d4fdb0cda8686b6ff9f77227a, updates the PR to omit obvious types. Original PR description: ## Motivation We'd like to let users opt-in to experimental features so that they can give early feedback while we iterate on the feature. For example: Example feature flags: 1. Android sensitive content: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/158473. When enabled, Flutter will tell Android when the view contains sensitive content like a password. 3. Desktop multi-window. When enabled, Flutter will use child windows to allow things like a context menu to "escape" outside of the current window. ### Use case Users will be able to turn on features by: * Option 1: Run `flutter config --enable-my-feature`. This enables the feature for all projects on the machine * Option 2: Add `enable-my-feature: true` in their `pubspec.yaml`, under the `flutter` section. This would enable the for a single project on the machine. Turning on a feature affects _both_ development-time (`flutter run`) and deployment-time (`flutter build x`). For example, I can `flutter build windows` to create an `.exe` with multi-window features enabled. ## How this works This adds a new [`runtimeId`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-0ded384225f19a4c34d43c7c11f7cb084ff3db947cfa82d8d52fc94c112bb2a7R243-R247) property to the tool's `Feature` class. If a feature is on and has a `runtimeId`, its `runtimeId` will be [stamped into the Dart application as a Dart define](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-bd662448bdc2e6f50e47cd3b20b22b41a828561bce65cb4d54ea4f5011cc604eR293-R327). The framework uses this Dart define to [determine which features are enabled](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-c8dbd5cd3103bc5be53c4ac5be8bdb9bf73e10cd5d8e4ac34e737fd1f8602d45). ### Multi-window example https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697 shows how this new feature flag system can be used to add a multi-window feature flag: 1. It adds a new [multi-window feature](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-0ded384225f19a4c34d43c7c11f7cb084ff3db947cfa82d8d52fc94c112bb2a7R189-R198) to the Flutter tool. This can be turned on using `flutter config --enable-multi-window` or by putting `enable-multi-window: true` in an app's .pubspec, under the `flutter` section. 2. It adds a new [`isMultiWindowEnabled`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-c8dbd5cd3103bc5be53c4ac5be8bdb9bf73e10cd5d8e4ac34e737fd1f8602d45R7-R11) property to the framework. 4. The Material library can use this new property to determine whether it should create a new window. [Example](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-2cbc1634ed6b61d61dfa090e7bfbbb7c60b74c8abc3a28df6f79eee691fd1b73). ## Limitations ### Tool and framework only For now, these feature flags are available only to the Flutter tool and Flutter framework. The flags are not automatically available to the embedder or the engine. For example, embedders need to configure their surfaces differently if Impeller is enabled. This configuration must happen before the Dart isolate is launched. As a result, the framework's feature flags is not a viable solution for this scenario for now. For these kinds of scenarios, we should continue to use platform-specific configuration like the `AndroidManifest.xml` or `Info.plist` files. This is a fixable limitation, we just need to invest in this plumbing :) ### Tree shaking Feature flags are not designed to help tree shaking. For example, you cannot conditionally import Dart code depending on the enabled feature flags. Code that is feature flagged off will still be imported into user's apps.	2025-07-15 00:02:16 +00:00
Kate Lovett	a04fb324be	Bump Dart to 3.8 and reformat (#171703 ) Bumps the Dart version to 3.8 across the repo (excluding engine/src/flutter/third_party) and applies formatting updates from Dart 3.8. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md	2025-07-07 17:58:32 +00:00
auto-submit[bot]	c2cd71309f	Reverts "Add feature flags to the framework (#168437 )" (#171542 ) <!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#168437 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: chingjun <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: broke internal customers <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: loic-sharma <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {bkonyi, justinmc, matanlurey} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: ## Motivation We'd like to let users opt-in to experimental features so that they can give early feedback while we iterate on the feature. For example: Example feature flags: 1. Android sensitive content: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/158473. When enabled, Flutter will tell Android when the view contains sensitive content like a password. 2. Desktop multi-window. When enabled, Flutter will use child windows to allow things like a context menu to "escape" outside of the current window. ### Use case Users will be able to turn on features by: * Option 1: Run `flutter config --enable-my-feature`. This enables the feature for all projects on the machine * Option 2: Add `enable-my-feature: true` in their `pubspec.yaml`, under the `flutter` section. This would enable the for a single project on the machine. Turning on a feature affects _both_ development-time (`flutter run`) and deployment-time (`flutter build x`). For example, I can `flutter build windows` to create an `.exe` with multi-window features enabled. ## How this works This adds a new [`runtimeId`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-0ded384225f19a4c34d43c7c11f7cb084ff3db947cfa82d8d52fc94c112bb2a7R243-R247) property to the tool's `Feature` class. If a feature is on and has a `runtimeId`, its `runtimeId` will be [stamped into the Dart application as a Dart define](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-bd662448bdc2e6f50e47cd3b20b22b41a828561bce65cb4d54ea4f5011cc604eR293-R327). The framework uses this Dart define to [determine which features are enabled](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-c8dbd5cd3103bc5be53c4ac5be8bdb9bf73e10cd5d8e4ac34e737fd1f8602d45). ### Multi-window example https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697 shows how this new feature flag system can be used to add a multi-window feature flag: 1. It adds a new [multi-window feature](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-0ded384225f19a4c34d43c7c11f7cb084ff3db947cfa82d8d52fc94c112bb2a7R189-R198) to the Flutter tool. This can be turned on using `flutter config --enable-multi-window` or by putting `enable-multi-window: true` in an app's .pubspec, under the `flutter` section. 2. It adds a new [`isMultiWindowEnabled`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-c8dbd5cd3103bc5be53c4ac5be8bdb9bf73e10cd5d8e4ac34e737fd1f8602d45R7-R11) property to the framework. 3. The Material library can use this new property to determine whether it should create a new window. [Example](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-2cbc1634ed6b61d61dfa090e7bfbbb7c60b74c8abc3a28df6f79eee691fd1b73). ## Limitations ### Tool and framework only For now, these feature flags are available only to the Flutter tool and Flutter framework. The flags are not automatically available to the embedder or the engine. For example, embedders need to configure their surfaces differently if Impeller is enabled. This configuration must happen before the Dart isolate is launched. As a result, the framework's feature flags is not a viable solution for this scenario for now. For these kinds of scenarios, we should continue to use platform-specific configuration like the `AndroidManifest.xml` or `Info.plist` files. This is a fixable limitation, we just need to invest in this plumbing :) ### Tree shaking Feature flags are not designed to help tree shaking. For example, you cannot conditionally import Dart code depending on the enabled feature flags. Code that is feature flagged off will still be imported into user's apps. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>	2025-07-02 20:31:18 +00:00
Loïc Sharma	c6f9e801b2	Add feature flags to the framework (#168437 ) ## Motivation We'd like to let users opt-in to experimental features so that they can give early feedback while we iterate on the feature. For example: Example feature flags: 1. Android sensitive content: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/158473. When enabled, Flutter will tell Android when the view contains sensitive content like a password. 2. Desktop multi-window. When enabled, Flutter will use child windows to allow things like a context menu to "escape" outside of the current window. ### Use case Users will be able to turn on features by: * Option 1: Run `flutter config --enable-my-feature`. This enables the feature for all projects on the machine * Option 2: Add `enable-my-feature: true` in their `pubspec.yaml`, under the `flutter` section. This would enable the for a single project on the machine. Turning on a feature affects _both_ development-time (`flutter run`) and deployment-time (`flutter build x`). For example, I can `flutter build windows` to create an `.exe` with multi-window features enabled. ## How this works This adds a new [`runtimeId`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-0ded384225f19a4c34d43c7c11f7cb084ff3db947cfa82d8d52fc94c112bb2a7R243-R247) property to the tool's `Feature` class. If a feature is on and has a `runtimeId`, its `runtimeId` will be [stamped into the Dart application as a Dart define](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-bd662448bdc2e6f50e47cd3b20b22b41a828561bce65cb4d54ea4f5011cc604eR293-R327). The framework uses this Dart define to [determine which features are enabled](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168437/files#diff-c8dbd5cd3103bc5be53c4ac5be8bdb9bf73e10cd5d8e4ac34e737fd1f8602d45). ### Multi-window example https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697 shows how this new feature flag system can be used to add a multi-window feature flag: 1. It adds a new [multi-window feature](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-0ded384225f19a4c34d43c7c11f7cb084ff3db947cfa82d8d52fc94c112bb2a7R189-R198) to the Flutter tool. This can be turned on using `flutter config --enable-multi-window` or by putting `enable-multi-window: true` in an app's .pubspec, under the `flutter` section. 2. It adds a new [`isMultiWindowEnabled`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-c8dbd5cd3103bc5be53c4ac5be8bdb9bf73e10cd5d8e4ac34e737fd1f8602d45R7-R11) property to the framework. 3. The Material library can use this new property to determine whether it should create a new window. [Example](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168697/files#diff-2cbc1634ed6b61d61dfa090e7bfbbb7c60b74c8abc3a28df6f79eee691fd1b73). ## Limitations ### Tool and framework only For now, these feature flags are available only to the Flutter tool and Flutter framework. The flags are not automatically available to the embedder or the engine. For example, embedders need to configure their surfaces differently if Impeller is enabled. This configuration must happen before the Dart isolate is launched. As a result, the framework's feature flags is not a viable solution for this scenario for now. For these kinds of scenarios, we should continue to use platform-specific configuration like the `AndroidManifest.xml` or `Info.plist` files. This is a fixable limitation, we just need to invest in this plumbing :) ### Tree shaking Feature flags are not designed to help tree shaking. For example, you cannot conditionally import Dart code depending on the enabled feature flags. Code that is feature flagged off will still be imported into user's apps. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md	2025-07-02 17:13:53 +00:00
Reid Baker	1dfb59d281	Android min sdk 24 part 1 (#170882 ) - bump template version, update migration code to handle api 21-23 and expand it to cover multiple min api level definitions - bump add to app project to minimum api level 24 - PathUtilsTest converted to using config, removed test code that branched on versions older than 24 - Update additional build.gradle files to have minsdk 24 and documenation Related to #170807 G3 cls - espresso https://critique.corp.google.com/cl/776592881 - integration tests cl/778034198 - removal of pre api 23 samples tests cl/777652802 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. --------- Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <34871572+gmackall@users.noreply.github.com>	2025-07-02 14:30:22 +00:00
auto-submit[bot]	5bdd0beed2	Reverts "add run_gradle_lock_files_check.dart for new PR's that modify gradle files (#169245 )" (#170770 ) <!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#169245 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: matanlurey <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: Increased the time of the test task `gradle_java8_compile_test` from about 5 minutes per run to over 30m, which hits the timeout causing tree failures. https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/luci.flutter.prod/Linux%20gradle_java8_compile_test <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: ash2moon <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {matanlurey} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: This commit checks if there have been any changes to the gradle files and if gradle lock files need updating. If so, it will alert then PR owner to update their PR with the new gradle lock file.s Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/163228 Example test run: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8712427303492230593/+/u/run_gradle_java8_compile_test/stdout?format=raw This was added as an existing test under Linux gradle_java8_compile_test because benchmarking results showed on average about 3min 30s to run on my local M2 Mac. SInce it is not > 10min to run, placing it inside an existing test case was ideal. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>	2025-06-17 23:59:28 +00:00
ash2moon	22dc6b6566	add run_gradle_lock_files_check.dart for new PR's that modify gradle files (#169245 ) This commit checks if there have been any changes to the gradle files and if gradle lock files need updating. If so, it will alert then PR owner to update their PR with the new gradle lock file.s Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/163228 Example test run: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8712427303492230593/+/u/run_gradle_java8_compile_test/stdout?format=raw This was added as an existing test under Linux gradle_java8_compile_test because benchmarking results showed on average about 3min 30s to run on my local M2 Mac. SInce it is not > 10min to run, placing it inside an existing test case was ideal. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md	2025-06-17 17:25:14 +00:00
Daco Harkes	5bee4880b9	Reland "[native assets] Build dev dependencies in `flutter test integration_test`" (#170728 ) Reland https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/170686. Closes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/168961. Original PR in first commit. Fix in subsequent commit: * Do process invocation of `flutter pub add` in a different way. Fixes: `ProcessException: %1 is not a valid Win32 application` Reproduced locally by changing dev/devicelab/bin/tasks/native_assets_android.dart to `DeviceOperatingSystem.windows` and verified the `flutter pub add` call now succeeds. (Also, moved the add integration test into the create test project to avoid having multiple `flutter pub get`s.) Third time is the charm.	2025-06-17 07:58:26 +00:00
auto-submit[bot]	d108234670	Reverts "Reland "[native assets] Build dev dependencies in `flutter test integration_test`" (#170686 )" (#170718 ) <!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#170686 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: matanlurey <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: Broke [`Windows_mokey native_assets_android`](https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Windows_mokey%20native_assets_android/2518/overview) again. <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: dcharkes <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {bkonyi, matanlurey} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: Reland https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/170374 Original PR in first commit. Fixes in subsequent commits: * `flutter` is not on the `PATH` in the device lab, use `_flutterBin` (consistent with the rest of the test). Fixes `flutter` not found. * `flutter test integration_test` now does not build assets for the host anymore. `flutter test` builds assets for the host. The `TestCommand` is now special-case to check for `_isIntegrationTest`. Fixes `clang++` not found. (It's the compiler for Linux, but we are running integration tests on an Android device.) Tests pass locally with: ``` $ cd /Users/dacoharkes/src/flutter/flutter/dev/devicelab && dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t native_assets_android ``` Note: * The device lab tests are not run on presubmit until https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/170682 is addressed. * The emulator tests are not run at all atm: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/170529. <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>	2025-06-17 00:01:48 +00:00
Daco Harkes	b5dbfc3a42	Reland "[native assets] Build dev dependencies in `flutter test integration_test`" (#170686 ) Reland https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/170374 Original PR in first commit. Fixes in subsequent commits: * `flutter` is not on the `PATH` in the device lab, use `_flutterBin` (consistent with the rest of the test). Fixes `flutter` not found. * `flutter test integration_test` now does not build assets for the host anymore. `flutter test` builds assets for the host. The `TestCommand` is now special-case to check for `_isIntegrationTest`. Fixes `clang++` not found. (It's the compiler for Linux, but we are running integration tests on an Android device.) Tests pass locally with: ``` $ cd /Users/dacoharkes/src/flutter/flutter/dev/devicelab && dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t native_assets_android ``` Note: * The device lab tests are not run on presubmit until https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/170682 is addressed. * The emulator tests are not run at all atm: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/170529.	2025-06-16 21:13:12 +00:00
auto-submit[bot]	a33b81c3f9	Reverts "[native assets] Build dev dependencies in `flutter test integration_test` (#170374 )" (#170673 ) <!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#170374 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: jtmcdole <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: "Consistently failed across all 3 executions" <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: dcharkes <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {vashworth, bkonyi} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: Closes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/168961 This PR ensures the build hooks of `dev_dependencies` are run on `flutter test integration_test`. `flutter test` already builds dev dependencies. However, `package:integration_test` is using `flutter assemble` which should not have dev dependencies included (`flutter build` should not bundle dev deps). ~~So, this PR adds a build define that's threaded through from `flutter test` to `flutter assemble`. It's threaded through gradle and xcode via `BuildInfo` and subsequently read in tool backend where it is added as an `Environment` define. Finally it is read in the `Target` that builds the native assets.~~ ~~One quirk is `flutter run test integration_test -d flutter-tester`. (No idea why someone would run that, but it works.) This doesn't spin up Gradle or XCode. So the environment is set directly.~~ Edit: We use the simpler `kBuildMode` to decide whether to include the native assets for dev dependencies. ## Testing * The desktop OSes and `flutter-tester` are tested in `packages/flutter_tools/test/integration.shard/isolated/native_assets_test.dart`. * iOS simulator, device, and Android device are tested in the device lab. * (All tests were added to existing tests, hopefully these don't start timing out.) ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>	2025-06-16 15:16:49 +00:00
Daco Harkes	02abf62968	[native assets] Build dev dependencies in `flutter test integration_test` (#170374 ) Closes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/168961 This PR ensures the build hooks of `dev_dependencies` are run on `flutter test integration_test`. `flutter test` already builds dev dependencies. However, `package:integration_test` is using `flutter assemble` which should not have dev dependencies included (`flutter build` should not bundle dev deps). ~~So, this PR adds a build define that's threaded through from `flutter test` to `flutter assemble`. It's threaded through gradle and xcode via `BuildInfo` and subsequently read in tool backend where it is added as an `Environment` define. Finally it is read in the `Target` that builds the native assets.~~ ~~One quirk is `flutter run test integration_test -d flutter-tester`. (No idea why someone would run that, but it works.) This doesn't spin up Gradle or XCode. So the environment is set directly.~~ Edit: We use the simpler `kBuildMode` to decide whether to include the native assets for dev dependencies. ## Testing * The desktop OSes and `flutter-tester` are tested in `packages/flutter_tools/test/integration.shard/isolated/native_assets_test.dart`. * iOS simulator, device, and Android device are tested in the device lab. * (All tests were added to existing tests, hopefully these don't start timing out.) ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md	2025-06-15 14:51:38 +00:00
Victoria Ashworth	22c916a2c0	Pause UIScene migration (#170490 ) UIScene migration is not yet enforced by Apple so we have some more time to handle this. Let's pause on auto-migrating projects. Reland of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/170457. This PR differs as it keeps our tests migrated to UI Scene lifecycle. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md	2025-06-12 21:24:05 +00:00
LouiseHsu	269771548f	Add time to first frame for `Mac_arm64_ios imitation_game_swiftui` (#167602 ) Partially addresses https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/154138 Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/170386 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing.	2025-06-11 23:09:54 +00:00
Jenn Magder	d3170f4a96	Remove deprecated Objective-C iOS app create template (#169547 ) Remove Objective-C template for new apps. Existing apps won't be impacted. Keep Objective-C templates for plugins, though their example apps will be Swift instead. See https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148586#issuecomment-2121323676 Move `templates/app/ios-swift.tmpl` to `templates/app/ios.tmpl`. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148586 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md	2025-06-06 16:58:09 +00:00
MarkZ	08cb3936a7	Explicitly disabling hot reload for non-hot-reload web debug benchmarks (#170006 ) Ensures that flipping our defaults for web hot reload won't affect our benchmarks.	2025-06-04 18:21:29 +00:00
Moritz	70aa4b3e54	Workspace (#169556 ) Reland after https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/169844. Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected packages. Assumptions: 1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`, `flutter_test`, and `flutter`. 2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter, flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other. Based on these assumptions, we use https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace. The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`, with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run `flutter upgrade`. There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and `packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely `packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger change, and out of the scope of this PR. This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a seamless transition. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md	2025-06-03 08:48:14 +00:00
Victoria Ashworth	88bc2536d3	Update iOS tools (#169863 ) Updates `libimobiledevice`, `libplist`, `openssl`, `usbmuxd` (renamed `libusbmuxd`) to newest commits. Also adds `libimobiledeviceglue`, which is a new dependency for `libimobiledevice`. I confirmed they are all codesigned: ``` codesign -d /Users/vashworth/Development/flutter/bin/cache/artifacts/libusbmuxd/iproxy -vv Executable=/Users/vashworth/Development/flutter/bin/cache/artifacts/libusbmuxd/iproxy Identifier=iproxy Format=Mach-O thin (x86_64) CodeDirectory v=20500 size=466 flags=0x10000(runtime) hashes=4+7 location=embedded Signature size=9048 Authority=Developer ID Application: FLUTTER.IO LLC (S8QB4VV633) Authority=Developer ID Certification Authority Authority=Apple Root CA Timestamp=May 29, 2025 at 8:19:14 PM Info.plist=not bound TeamIdentifier=S8QB4VV633 Runtime Version=15.2.0 Sealed Resources=none Internal requirements count=1 size=168 ``` Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/165656, https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/42969 ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md	2025-06-02 18:35:14 +00:00
auto-submit[bot]	4372bfbc6c	Reverts "Add workspace (#169451 )" (#169468 ) <!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#169451 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: matanlurey <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: Broke a number of post-submit tests (ios_app_extension, packages_autoroller). <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: mosuem <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {matanlurey} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: Reland after #169357. Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected packages. Assumptions: 1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`, `flutter_test`, and `flutter`. 2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter, flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other. Based on these assumptions, we use https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace. The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`, with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run `flutter upgrade`. There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and `packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely `packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger change, and out of the scope of this PR. This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a seamless transition. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>	2025-05-26 14:07:27 +00:00
Moritz	3a0897a336	Add workspace (#169451 ) Reland after #169357. Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected packages. Assumptions: 1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`, `flutter_test`, and `flutter`. 2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter, flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other. Based on these assumptions, we use https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace. The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`, with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run `flutter upgrade`. There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and `packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely `packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger change, and out of the scope of this PR. This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a seamless transition. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md	2025-05-26 12:46:53 +00:00
auto-submit[bot]	e0c42c6e38	Reverts "Use pub workspace (#168662 )" (#169357 ) <!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter/flutter#168662 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: matanlurey <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: Broke integration tests that do not run on presubmit: - https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Mac_arm64%20macos_chrome_dev_mode/8715/overview - https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Linux_pixel_7pro%20linux_chrome_dev_mode/7617/overview <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: mosuem <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {matanlurey} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected packages. Assumptions: 1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`, `flutter_test`, and `flutter`. 2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter, flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other. Based on these assumptions, we use https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace. The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`, with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run `flutter upgrade`. There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and `packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely `packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger change, and out of the scope of this PR. This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a seamless transition. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>	2025-05-23 16:00:19 +00:00

1 2 3 4 5 ...

1192 Commits